Re: seancorfield /clj-soap

2013-05-20 Thread Sean Corfield
I had to revert to Axis 1.x for compatibility with some 3rd party code I don't control that has to run in the same servlet container as our Clojure code. The Axis 2.x wrapper looked much nicer but we couldn't use it. Sean On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Marc Boschma marc.bosc...@gmail.com

Re: seancorfield /clj-soap

2013-05-18 Thread mwillson
Marc, I tried and also failed. I ended up writing my own. See http://www.hydrus.org.uk/journal/soap.html -mark On Saturday, 18 May 2013 05:29:40 UTC+1, marc wrote: Hoping someone has already explored this. Has anyone ever used clj-soap as a client and managed to pass in Basic

Re: seancorfield /clj-soap

2013-05-18 Thread Sean Corfield
Since my name was invoked via mention of this repo, I figured it was a good chance to post from the readme: Note however that I am not actively maintaining this library and would welcome someone taking it over. I updated Tetsuya's code to use a more modern Clojure environment purely to test it

Re: seancorfield /clj-soap

2013-05-18 Thread Marc Boschma
Well understood Sean! If I work out away to up lift the code I'll contribute that back. I was just checking to see if anyone else had tried. If, like you, I need to find another way is Axis 1.x an easier platform than 2.x ?The Java SOAP landscape seems overly complex. Marc I really wish the

Re: seancorfield /clj-soap

2013-05-18 Thread Keith Irwin
On May 18, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Marc Boschma marc.bosc...@gmail.com wrote: Well understood Sean! If I work out away to up lift the code I'll contribute that back. I was just checking to see if anyone else had tried. If, like you, I need to find another way is Axis 1.x an easier platform

seancorfield /clj-soap

2013-05-17 Thread marc
Hoping someone has already explored this. Has anyone ever used clj-soap as a client and managed to pass in Basic authentication credentials? I tried putting them into the URL to the WSDL but that did seem to work… Off to read up on Axis 2… -- -- You received this message because you are