+1
On Oct 6, 10:43 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this gets traction, please also consider a name change to something
> more along the lines of "read-file" and "write-file".
>
> --Steve
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message bec
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this gets traction, please also consider a name change to something
> more along the lines of "read-file" and "write-file".
I guess that spit and slurp are more original and therefore less
likely to clash with exis
On Oct 6, 6:40 pm, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> For consistency, I would like to see spit moved into the boot.clj.
>
> This will play well with the Java crowd. For years I have poked fun of
> Java for having megabytes of core library and no simple way to save a
> f
On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Matti Jagula wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Stuart Halloway
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For consistency, I would like to see spit moved into the boot.clj.
>
> I wholeheartedly agree.
>
> And I'd also like both slurp and spit to support encod
Hi all,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Stuart Halloway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For consistency, I would like to see spit moved into the boot.clj.
I wholeheartedly agree.
And I'd also like both slurp and spit to support encoding as an
optional parameter as it is a bit of pain to write my o
Hi all
For consistency, I would like to see spit moved into the boot.clj.
This will play well with the Java crowd. For years I have poked fun of
Java for having megabytes of core library and no simple way to save a
file.
Stuart
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
