Excellent. I am taking notes on Steele's talk and adding them
to the CiSP parallel section. In Clojure it might be possible
to dynamically change the number of processes. With the
bit-partition idea is might even be convenient.
There was some discussion about this topic after David Liebke's
There was some discussion about this topic after David Liebke's talk
at the conj about the prototype fork/join filter/map/etc work that
Rich did. The talk isn't out on video yet but slides are here:
http://incanter.org/downloads/fjclj.pdf
and I wrote up some of these notes here:
http://tech.pured
Steele is advocating binaries trees as an way of
doing parallel computation. I think that this idea
is reasonable but might be more effectively applied
in Clojure.
The idea of "binary" could be expanded in a very
simple way to use log32 instead which is a natural
mapping to the Clojure data stru
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Benny Tsai wrote:
> In the Hacker News discussion about that talk, someone posted a link
> to another talk by Guy Steele on the same topic:
>
> http://vimeo.com/6624203
>
> ... where he covers the material in somewhat greater depth (the
> downside being that by the
jure in a parallel setting (e.g.
> MPI, Hadoop)
> this might be of interest:
>
> http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Thinking-Parallel-Programming
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo
Guy Steele recently gave a talk about thinking about parallel programming.
For those of us who are looking at Clojure in a parallel setting (e.g.
MPI, Hadoop)
this might be of interest:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Thinking-Parallel-Programming
--
You received this message because you
