Re: would FixedThreadPool-backed reducers make sense?

2013-03-30 Thread Gary Verhaegen
The implementation of Clojure sequence library predates protocols. This is, however, the way forward, at least in clojurescript : https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/master/src/cljs/cljs/core.cljs#L191 On 28 March 2013 14:49, vemv v...@vemv.net wrote: I recall from Rich's presentation

would FixedThreadPool-backed reducers make sense?

2013-03-28 Thread vemv
I recall from Rich's presentation on reducers (and it's intuitively true anyway) that FJ is not well suited to all workloads: uniform ones would do just fine with a fixed allocation of tasks to threads. I believe the tradeoff in that case is that one has to manage parallelism very explicitly.