Thanks for the detailed response, Sean. Interesting and good points.
I've seen Peters notes and my initial thoughts were that half of the Bad
points can be easily solved using om-tools and the other half by adhering
to a strict separation between domain state (the what - stuff you'd store
in a
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 11:06:07 AM UTC+2, Yehonathan Sharvit wrote:
I am wondering why the cljs compiler emits code that calls functions using
call and not straight js function call.
for instance:
(defn foo [])
(foo)
is compiled to:
user.foo = function() {
return
I'm curious as well. I started with Reagent, but switched to Om/Sablono after
finding Reagent's app data handling too limited for what I needed. The
trade-off is much more to think about (complexity) when writing Om components.
Jamie
On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:51 AM, Daniel Kersten
I actually found Reagent's data handling to be very flexible. It' makes it easy
to create local states for components as well as managing the global state
using a global state atom. I'd be curious to hear what limitations others have
run into and how they could be addressed.
On Wednesday,
