Use the native apply:
(.apply (.-setAlign n) n #js [1 2 3])
On Thursday, July 2, 2015, Sonny To son.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I have setAlign method on a javascript object called n:
(.setAlign n 1 2 3)
I want to use apply to make the same call
(apply (.setAlign n) [1 2 3])
However that
memfn won't bind `this`, unless I missed that enhancement :)
On Thursday, July 2, 2015, Joe R. Smith j...@uwcreations.com wrote:
You want `memfn`.
(apply (memfn setAlign) n [1 2 3])
On Jul 2, 2015, at 6:27 AM, Sonny To son.c...@gmail.com javascript:;
wrote:
I have setAlign method on
Does *(apply .setAlign n [1 2 3])* work?
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 at 13:23 Sonny To son.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I have setAlign method on a javascript object called n:
(.setAlign n 1 2 3)
I want to use apply to make the same call
(apply (.setAlign n) [1 2 3])
However that does work. Any
You want `memfn`.
(apply (memfn setAlign) n [1 2 3])
On Jul 2, 2015, at 6:27 AM, Sonny To son.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I have setAlign method on a javascript object called n:
(.setAlign n 1 2 3)
I want to use apply to make the same call
(apply (.setAlign n) [1 2 3])
However that
I have setAlign method on a javascript object called n:
(.setAlign n 1 2 3)
I want to use apply to make the same call
(apply (.setAlign n) [1 2 3])
However that does work. Any suggestion on how to use apply in this way? The
alternative is to write a macro.
thanks,
Sonny
--
Note that posts
Having worked remotely for a couple years now, I can definitely say I’m far
more productive.
This sums up why:
http://heeris.id.au/2013/this-is-why-you-shouldnt-interrupt-a-programmer/
On Jul 2, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Alan Moore kahunamo...@coopsource.org wrote:
When constrained by a
When constrained by a technology choice you may have to give up requiring other
developers to be physically proximate.
I know managers want the comfort of observing warm bodies in cubes banging on
keyboards but it doesn't necessarily translate into higher productivity, I get
my best work done
