Yes I did. Calling load :a loads :b in XHR then nothing, doesn't load :a
afterwards.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019, 10:44 PM Thomas Heller You didn't show your config but did you correctly configure that :a
> depends on :b? eg. :depends-on #{:b}? That can't be inferred so you must
> manually configure it.
You didn't show your config but did you correctly configure that :a depends
on :b? eg. :depends-on #{:b}? That can't be inferred so you must manually
configure it.
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:11:20 PM UTC+1, Khalid Jebbari wrote:
>
> In case it wasn't clear, the javascript file for
In case it wasn't clear, the javascript file for :cljs-base is included as
a script tag in the html, and it loads :a.
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:01:33 PM UTC+1, Khalid Jebbari wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I create 3 modules in the :modules configuration, say :cljs-base, :a & :b,
> and know that
Hello,
I create 3 modules in the :modules configuration, say :cljs-base, :a & :b,
and know that module :a depends on code in the module :b (and in :cljs-base
of course). If I manually load only :a with `(cljs.loader/load :a)`, will
it automatically load :b? My local testing seems to show that
I get it. Maybe in the future the type inference could inform the Closure
Compiler of the types, so that it could emit smaller code ? Really curious
about it.
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 11:06:49 AM UTC+1, Thomas Heller wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 5:54:13 AM UTC+1, Khalid
On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 5:54:13 AM UTC+1, Khalid Jebbari wrote:
>
> Can it make bundles smaller ?
>
Yes in theory, but only by a very small fraction. The cljs.core/str macro
may emit less code in certain situations for example but after :advanced
optimizations the difference will be
