11:08, David Nolen wrote:
>
> That's what server-side mutations do there's nothing to wait for. If you're
> talking about some kind of push state thing, there's nothing stopping you
> from implementing that today and people already have.
>
> David
ound the error
> handling story. For the time being you'll have to sort something out
> yourself, but the idea is that error handling will eventually be a first
> class feature.
>
> David
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Max Countryman <mailto:m...@me.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I’m curious about the preferred method for communicating errors occurring in a
backend mutation function.
For example, say we have some input from a frontend form that we need to
validate on the backend when we submit this form. We have a mutation function
which carries out form input stat
