[ClojureScript] Re: When will the async/await feature in ES8 be introduced in ClojureScript?

2018-05-24 Thread Nikita Dudnik
Sorry for answering with a question but I have to second Andrew. What's wrong with core.async and more importantly how'd you implement async/await in clojurescript in terms of syntax? - Nik On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 6:44:06 AM UTC+2, Philos Kim wrote: > > I wonder when the async/await featu

[ClojureScript] Re: Any cutting edge reagent/reframe demos out there?

2018-02-04 Thread Nikita Dudnik
Hey, What about this https://github.com/status-im/status-react On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 5:23:47 PM UTC+1, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > > I'd love a demo that I can show my team to illustrate what reagent and > reframe can do. > > Does anyone know of any? > -- Note that posts from new memb

[ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-12-09 Thread Nikita Dudnik
> I would claim that Reagent is FRP via its use of the ratom. Once you > understand how it works the penny drops. Reagent effectively has its own > version of "lift" (look for "reaction" and "run!" which are not promoted by > the standard docs). > > As a result, I would claim that Reagent ha

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-12-01 Thread Nikita Dudnik
> I could but I think it's better for people to come to their own > conclusions about the fundamental issues inherent in React-like > systems that Flux tries to overcome. Only when you can see this can > you even been to start having meaningful discussions about React and > its derivatives. Ок :)

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-12-01 Thread Nikita Dudnik
> Om doesn't actually enforce anything, it does provide defaults because > eventually you bottom out at "taste". I absolutely haven’t hit the bottom yet and I really appreciate you sharing your experience. > I work with Luke and I'm a big fan of Quiescent's minimal approach. > But this is not w

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-12-01 Thread Nikita Dudnik
Sorry, I was too deep in a thread. :) We are already discussing Om vs. Quiescent. — Nikita Dudnik http://nikdudnik.com On Monday, December 1, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Nikita Dudnik wrote: > > This isn't a challenge, but a question of clarity. > > > > Can’t argue with tha

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-12-01 Thread Nikita Dudnik
t sound > like it) or could be improved if only they did X...? > > > On 30 November 2014 at 23:26, Nikita Dudnik (mailto:nikdud...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > Here's another elm library https://github.com/ericnormand/elm-frp > > > > I’ve seen

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-11-30 Thread Nikita Dudnik
> Here's another elm library https://github.com/ericnormand/elm-frp I’ve seen it but I’m pretty sure it’s just a proof of concept for Eric Normand’s blog post: http://www.lispcast.com/elm-frp-clojure-core-async > Hopefully i'll get to use one of these with om soon, could make reasoning > with mul

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-11-30 Thread Nikita Dudnik
No worries, it was clear enough. I appreciate the info on CSP drawbacks ‘cause I have more experience with FRP (client-side JS, bacon.js implementation). I’ll take a closer look at your project. Seems both relevant and interesting. — Nikita Dudnik http://nikdudnik.com On Sunday, November 30

[ClojureScript] Re: Om or quiescent ?

2014-11-29 Thread Nikita Dudnik
On Friday, November 28, 2014 9:43:16 PM UTC+3, nuryoku san wrote: > If you want to get adventurous... take a step further back and take a look at > FRP and Elm. The examples show incredible terse and readable(?) code. Elm > might be a light ahead that shines for clojure ui-programming too, but ..

[ClojureScript] Re: Are experienced JS developers looking for ClojureScript jobs?

2014-02-28 Thread Nikita Dudnik
Hi, I'm experienced JS developer with a very little prior knowledge of Clojure (and I'm mostly interested in ClojureScript). I'm front-end guy with experience in web video/audio/canvas (video players, audio processing, web games). I really like FP and hate Java-like OOP style in JS (but I do lik