That’s good stuff!
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:34 PM Sonny To wrote:
> https://bitbucket.org/sonwh98/stigmergy-webtop
>
>
> On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 6:23:47 PM UTC+2, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
>>
>> I'd love a demo that I can show my team to illustrate what reagent and
>> reframe can do.
>>
>
That’s amazing! I’ll be sure to check out and follow this project.
But I’m looking for more of an actual demo, with examples and showing
advanced features. I want to really impress a team of developers with what
Clojurescript and Re-frame can do.
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 6:25 AM Nikita Dudnik wrot
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the response!
I'm going to spend some time today reading through the docs you sent, and
working up an example app. In the meantime, here are answers to your
questions.
There are 3 of us on the team. We have a senior with a few years of
experience with ClojureScript (myself)
I'm not using Figwheel with Node, though that sounds like a good next step
since CIDER isn't picking up the NodeJS imports.
I decided to try NodeJS since it has a lot of support around the office,
and this is a script which should have a short startup time. So far, so
good.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 a
Ok, I’ll have to dig into your examples and code and see which approach
I’ll try.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:40 AM Jonathan Fischer
wrote:
> It kind of comes down to how you're managing the state in your project.
> I'm using re-frame at the moment, so I have kind of top-level key in my
> project
Actually, then, maybe I should check out transit, and modify my questions
accordingly. Would the switch to Transit be similar to the switch to EDN?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM Brandon Adams wrote:
> Last time I checked, EDN was slower than JSON browser-side. I don't have
> any numbers on th
I wish I could, but compiler design is over my head
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:38 AM David Nolen wrote:
> Still planned, but as always a patch is most welcome.
>
> David
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jonathon McKitrick
> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 12:23:55 PM UTC-4, Dav
Hi Sebastian,
I'm using cemerick/clojurescript.test 0.3.3.
The test command I use is
{"client-test" ["phantomjs"
;;"slimerjs"
:runner "resources/es5-shim.js" "resources/public/js/client-test.js"]}
As far as I know, there should be no CoffeeScript anywhere in the system.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at
That's exactly what I was thinking - an alias to start the server first.
I'm at the same place, working on tests for React apps.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:59 AM Sebastian Bensusan wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> I've encountered the same issue and so far my solution has been to run
> something like `le
Just to clarify, I don't think I want to mock those calls. I believe it
makes more sense to have the front-end call a running server back-end and
get real data. Can this be set up and executed from a test suite, short of
running a server in one console, and then the clojurescript test suite in
an
Thanks for taking the time to diagnose and explain. I'm glad it wasn't a
boneheaded user mistake.
So you are saying I can compile different parts of the classpath under
different optimization settings, by stacking profiles, I assume?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:23 PM David Nolen wrote:
> First
Well, actually, that might work. I was hoping for something more
attention-grabbing, but this will work for now. Thanks!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM Colin Yates wrote:
> Might be my ignorance of reagent, but why can't you just {:title "My
> tooltip"} to the button itself:
>
> [:button.btn
12 matches
Mail list logo
