On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:25:24 +
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Unfortunately, no, I use the 1.4.0 that came with Rawhide.
> > I'd love to use 1.4.3, if only I knew how to find the SRPM.
> > Looks like it's not anywhere at Koji.
> David - please and pretty please push your 1.4.3 packaging somewher
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 22:00 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:07:18 +
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > > LookupError: Entry point 'tempauth' not found in egg 'swift' (dir:
> > > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages; protocols: paste.filter_factory,
> > > paste.filter_app_factory
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:20:14PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 05:42 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > About unittests, we probably want to either disable just the specific
> > unittests or add a compat package with the newer versions of nose. RHEL6
> > seems to include 0.10.4 and t
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:07:18 +
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > LookupError: Entry point 'tempauth' not found in egg 'swift' (dir:
> > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages; protocols: paste.filter_factory,
> > paste.filter_app_factory; entry_points: )
>
> This is with 1.4.3? Is it David's packaging?
On 11/16/2011 07:11 PM, Steve Traylen wrote:
> 2011/11/16 Pádraig Brady :
>> python-nose is not new enough to build. The correct version wasn't
>>specified in the spec though and the resultant error crashed RHEL once:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753505
>>I hacked to
On 11/16/2011 05:42 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:09:36AM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> Yes it's awkward. Here are my rebuild notes for 0.6.8 on RHEL 6.2
>>
>> python-nose is not new enough to build. The correct version wasn't
>> specified in the spec though and th
2011/11/16 Pádraig Brady :
> python-nose is not new enough to build. The correct version wasn't
> specified in the spec though and the resultant error crashed RHEL once:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753505
> I hacked together an updated python-nose to allow running sqla
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:09:36AM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> Yes it's awkward. Here are my rebuild notes for 0.6.8 on RHEL 6.2
>
> python-nose is not new enough to build. The correct version wasn't
> specified in the spec though and the resultant error crashed RHEL once:
> ht
Hi Pete,
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:49 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, Alan:
>
> Does the following look familiar to you by any chance (after swift-init
> main start):
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/swift-proxy-server", line 22, in
> run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-serv
Hi, Alan:
Does the following look familiar to you by any chance (after swift-init
main start):
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/swift-proxy-server", line 22, in
run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', default_port=8080, **options)
..
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/
On 11/16/2011 12:53 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Yep. It's not too hard to package parallel installable versions. Getting
> software to use it is the hard part. You can use setuptools to set python to
> find the correct versions (which is the recommendations in the guidelines I
> believe). T
11 matches
Mail list logo