On 16/10/13 23:24, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 10/15/2013 01:06 PM, Alex Drahon wrote:
Hope some of you can test it.
I'm building it for F19 and F20 for the two machines I use vagrant on
to test with and will get back to you.
One thing I noticed is you have a separate vagrant-doc
On 16/10/13 23:49, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 10/15/2013 01:06 PM, Alex Drahon wrote:
On 26/09/13 22:09, Alex Drahon wrote:
On 24/09/13 06:43, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
On 09/23/2013 06:37 AM, Alexandre Drahon wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to give an update on the status of Vagrant in Fedora 20,
On 16/10/13 23:54, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 10/15/2013 01:06 PM, Alex Drahon wrote:
Hope some of you can test it.
After doing a vagrant up --provider=kvm I get prompted via polkit and
then the terminal output is as follows:
[gnat@iridium kvm]$ vagrant up --provider=kvm
Bringing
These are available from
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-TC5/Images/x86_64/
and
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-TC5/Images/i386/
Please help test these, either in OpenStack (or other private cloud systems,
like Eucalyptus), or in EC2 -- the AMI ids are
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09:39AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
1) You get a complaint that delta RPM isn't enabled when installing
packages. Not a major problem, but talking to Matthew we wondered
whether we should include delta RPM by default or suppress the warning.
In the past, I've found
On 2013-10-17 9:15, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09:39AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
1) You get a complaint that delta RPM isn't enabled when installing
packages. Not a major problem, but talking to Matthew we wondered
whether we should include delta RPM by default or
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Garrett Holmstrom
gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2013-10-17 9:15, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09:39AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
1) You get a complaint that delta RPM isn't enabled when installing
packages. Not a major problem, but
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:36:01PM -0400, Sam Kottler wrote:
Given the deny-by-default nature of security groups I think it makes
sense to disable firewalld in the AMI's. I haven't seen any other AMI's
that have a firewall enabled by default and we probably shouldn't break
that pattern IMO.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Sandro red Mathys
r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Crazy idea: disable the Firewall by default but allow users to enable
it through cloud-init (i.e. user-data)? Just in case there are people
who prefer the instance's firewall over security groups and open the
- Original Message -
From: Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org
To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:29:06 PM
Subject: Re: please help test beta test candidate cloud images
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Sandro red Mathys
10 matches
Mail list logo
