On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:02:19AM -0400, Sam Kottler wrote:
> Should we request a trac instance to manage requests like this and make
> sure they get covered during the meeting?
Good idea. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4088
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect
- Original Message -
> From: "Frankie Onuonga"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:18:34 AM
> Subject: Re: Cloud WG initial IRC meeting
>
> Time works fine for me as long as it is not Thursday,
> There is a fedora infra meeting then.
>
> Sure I should be on.
>
Time works fine for me as long as it is not Thursday,
There is a fedora infra meeting then.
Sure I should be on.
Kindly advice on the day.
Kind Regards,
Frankie.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dennis Gilmore"
> > To: cloud@li
- Original Message -
> From: "Dennis Gilmore"
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 10:57:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Cloud WG initial IRC meeting
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:06:43 -0400
> Matthew Miller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:06:43 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to
> meet at 19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-meeting-1
> (because the FESCo meeting in #fedora-meeting has been
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:31:18AM -0600, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 03:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >(5) Digital signatures: Currently virt-builder requires all indexes
> >and images to be signed by yours truly unless you go through an
> >involved process described here:
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:29:19PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think having metadata is a good idea. At the very least it allows
> you to have a tool where you can list available images, their sizes,
> locations and notes. The virt-builder index ties in with libosinfo as
> well, allowing
Top Post actually makes sense this time.
PRD == Product Requirements Document
MRD == Marketing Requirements Document.
On 28 October 2013 07:19, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I took an initial cut at the framework/outline for a PRD, and started
> filling in... some bits of it, mostly in
On 10/28/2013 03:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
(5) Digital signatures: Currently virt-builder requires all indexes
and images to be signed by yours truly unless you go through an
involved process described here:
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html#setting-up-a-gpg-key
We need to fix t
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:17:28AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:48:52 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > (3) Virt-builder requires all images to be GPG-signed. It worries me
> > that these images are neither signed nor downloaded over https.
>
> most if not all mirr
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:17:28AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > there. The format of the index file is described here:
> > http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html#creating-and-signing-the-index-file
> > However having the index file will be less useful until (1) is fixed.
> We would need a w
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:13:57PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 02:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to meet at
> > 19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the
> > FESCo meeting in #fedora-meet
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 6:06:43 AM
> Subject: Cloud WG initial IRC meeting
>
> Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to meet at
> 19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-me
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 09:06 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to meet at
> 19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the
> FESCo meeting in #fedora-meeting has been running more than an hour) and
> I'll say someth
Hi folks,
I took an initial cut at the framework/outline for a PRD, and started filling
in... some bits of it, mostly in an "example" type format so people can get an
idea of context, other parts in a more "this is a description of what should be
here," etc.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Clou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:48:52 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> [NB: CC'd to the Fedora cloud SIG mailing list]
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:22:44AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:20:11PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wro
On 10/28/2013 02:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to meet at
> 19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the
> FESCo meeting in #fedora-meeting has been running more than an hour) and
> I'll say something on #fed
Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to meet at
19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the
FESCo meeting in #fedora-meeting has been running more than an hour) and
I'll say something on #fedora-cloud a few minutes before it starts.
I'll also s
On 10/25/2013 08:32 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hey,
I just wanted to quickly point out oVirt Node here [0] which is
currently a "tiny" image which actually does this: Just run containers
(in this case qemu instances, but probably extendable to other
containers too).
Our concept is different - we
[NB: CC'd to the Fedora cloud SIG mailing list]
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:22:44AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:20:11PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Is there a reason to not use the official Fedora cloud images?
> > That's part 2 of this exercise. Would like
20 matches
Mail list logo
