Re: Fedora.next Product Branding for Cloud

2013-11-22 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 22/11/2013 21:02, Joe Brockmeier a écrit : Ah, OK. For sanity's sake, can we use industry definitions instead of coining our own? SaaS == Software as a Service, e.g. Salesforce or Dropbox. agreed, i'm not a native speaker so it's probably a misunderstanding, i wanted to convey that SaaS a

Re: Fedora.next Product Branding for Cloud

2013-11-22 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 08:14:57PM +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote: > Le 22/11/2013 19:25, Joe Brockmeier a écrit : > >On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:16:06PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>since i might be unable to join the cloud WG meeting, here are my thoughts > >>about it: > >> > >>1. Just Eno

Re: Fedora.next Product Branding for Cloud

2013-11-22 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 22/11/2013 19:25, Joe Brockmeier a écrit : On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:16:06PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote: Hi, since i might be unable to join the cloud WG meeting, here are my thoughts about it: 1. Just Enough OS for developping SaaS applications in an agile & devops fashion :). I think your r

Re: Fedora.next Product Branding for Cloud

2013-11-22 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:16:06PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > Hi, > > since i might be unable to join the cloud WG meeting, here are my thoughts > about it: > > 1. Just Enough OS for developping SaaS applications in an agile & devops > fashion :). I think your response and mine are largely simila

cloud-initramfs-tools update for F20

2013-11-22 Thread Juerg Haefliger
All, I realize it's late in the cycle but I just pushed an update to cloud-initramfs-tools: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cloud-initramfs-tools-0.20-2.fc20 The package contains fixes for: 1003153 - dracut growroot module leaves an empty directory around which breaks dracut 1016648 - AR

Re: Fedora 20 TC2 AMIs

2013-11-22 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/21/2013 03:13 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Matthew Miller writes: > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 01:30:15PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> I ran basic tests agains them and they're ok. The only issue I still >>> see is wrong SELinux context