On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 02:59:00PM +, Colin Walters wrote:
Yeah, agreed here. Everyone wants the latest shiniest thing, even if
that thing isn't ready. I really don't want to wade through tons of
bug reports for btrfs just because it has a lot of hype.
Also, right now cloud is plain old
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:36:30PM +0100, Bertrand Juglas wrote:
Hello,
I will try to install it on my OpenShift account this week before arriving
to FOSDEM to see if I can make it work.
So if I have problems it should be easier to finish it at FOSDEM.
Hi Bertrand! Any luck with this? This
Hi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
No, that isn't true. Without wide adoption you may not have any
impetus for btrfs to get better. However, it getting better is
dependent upon wider development, maintenance, and testing. I'm not
sure we are in a position to actually
Does Red Hat provide support for Fedora? If not then in my opinion btrfs
would be a great use case for Fedora to push upstream to RHEL. With XFS
defaulting in RHEL 7 that's cool so I think we should be ahead of the curve
not an Ubuntu competitor or a glorified RHEL release. Like I said in my
==
#fedora-meeting-1: cloud WG weekly meeting
==
Meeting started by jzb at 17:01:42 UTC. The full logs are available at
Howdy all,
We have a deadline looming for 3 March 2014 to get our technical
specification / changes list together for FESCo.
Current brainstorming:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_Changelist
We need to organize, prioritize, and format as actual changes for FESCo.
Let's start at the usual
