Thanks,
seems fedimg is going to be both an image upload and test service, right?
Cheers,
milan
2014-10-03 14:22 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:57:43PM +0200, milanisko k wrote:
are the Cloud Image news being published on the Fedmsg channels?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:28:27PM +0200, milanisko k wrote:
seems fedimg is going to be both an image upload and test service, right?
The idea is for it to do some really simple initial smoketests, to save
further testing systems from wasting time. I don't think we want it to grow
to become yet
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:01:14PM -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
Hey fellow fedorans!
I've made some slight edits to the existing Test Overview [0] on the wiki
and would like some feedback. It's meant as a high-level overview of all the
things we think we need to test for the Fedora 21 cloud
Cool, thanks.
Smoke-testing at this step is a reasonable thing to do.
I'm asking because our RCM is currently in the process of adopting a
strategy similar to fedimg so I thought we could donate couple of extra
cycles should the community benefit from our test harness.
Anyways, we'd be delighted
@Mike: a big fat +1 :)
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hey all,
One of the things that came out of the weekly meeting with infra/releng
and folks working on Atomic is what I think may be a mis-match in
expectations on upgrades/release process for the Atomic host.
As called out in the host definition[1] Atomic is planned as a rolling
stream of
=
#atomic: Fedora Atomic and Infrastructure
=
Meeting started by jzb at 18:09:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2014-10-07/atomic.2014-10-07-18.09.log.html
.
Meeting
Hey all,
A little early, but I'm going to be out of office Friday and won't be
able to make the meeting. If someone can chair, I'll try to make sure
the agenda is updated and will send along my notes/report before then.
Thanks,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:51:54PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
A little early, but I'm going to be out of office Friday and won't be
able to make the meeting. If someone can chair, I'll try to make sure
the agenda is updated and will send along my notes/report before then.
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:57:43PM +0200, milanisko k wrote:
Guys,
are the Cloud Image news being published on the Fedmsg channels?
I'd like to investigate integration of RedHatQE's test runner and suite
https://github.com/RedHatQE/dva.
Thanks,
milan
Milan,
Currently fedimg has
On 10/07/2014 06:18 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
I can chair this weeks meeting unless someone else is itching to do it.
/me watches the scrum as people jostle to chair the meeting...
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:33 -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
One of the things that came out of the weekly meeting with infra/releng
and folks working on Atomic is what I think may be a mis-match in
expectations on upgrades/release process for the Atomic host.
As called out in the
On 10/08/2014 12:26 AM, James Antill wrote:
I would also disagree strongly that RHEL will ever follow this model. I
would bet a huge amount of money that if customers are using the
official trees at all then enough of them will be willing to pay for
rhel8 after rhel9 goes live that it'll just
13 matches
Mail list logo
