On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:01:19PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:04:56PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160833
The bug has been updated.. Looks like the reporter was using the cloud
image and not the atomic image. I just
=
#fedora-meeting: Cloud WG
=
Meeting started by kushal at 19:02:50 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-11-05/fedora-meeting.2014-11-05-19.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* Roll
Thanks for chairing + sending this out!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:34:48PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
So anyway, the question: who wants to own or co-own this package?
Owning the package will consist of...? I assume the design folks will
continue to actually produce the graphics, etc.?
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal
I can comaintain this package. I assume you don't expect me to do any
graphic work because it will be awful :o)
H.
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct:
- Forwarded Message -
From: Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 6:14:27 PM
Subject: Re: #6032: Atomic image is missing from the mirrors
#6032: Atomic image is missing from the mirrors
-+---
Koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7978937
OZ log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8937/7978937/oz-x86_64.log
It looks to me like we hung in the rpm -qa listing. Hard to guess why without
being able to get in there with a debugger or something =/ Any
I don't think either of these are the cause of the hang, but I believe they're
both correct. Tested with a local ImageFactory run.
From 41f019b6d58f59863e282727e695ef196deac87e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:34:38 -0500
Subject: [PATCH
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:45:28PM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
So anyway, the question: who wants to own or co-own this package?
Owning the package will consist of...? I assume the design folks will
continue to actually produce the graphics, etc.?
Right -- the package consists of symlinks
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:33:41PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] atomic: We do not support pv-grub
Atomic is HVM only, since OSTree doesn't understand grub1 at the
moment, and incentive to have it do so is low.
We need to make sure this is the case in the EC2 image
10 matches
Mail list logo