Re: fedora atomic beta feedback (in short: many things broken)

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:01:19PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:04:56PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160833 The bug has been updated.. Looks like the reporter was using the cloud image and not the atomic image. I just

Cloud SIG meeting minutes 2014-11-05

2014-11-06 Thread Kushal Das
= #fedora-meeting: Cloud WG = Meeting started by kushal at 19:02:50 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-11-05/fedora-meeting.2014-11-05-19.02.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll

Re: Cloud SIG meeting minutes 2014-11-05

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Thanks for chairing + sending this out! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedora-productimg-cloud package

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:34:48PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: So anyway, the question: who wants to own or co-own this package? Owning the package will consist of...? I assume the design folks will continue to actually produce the graphics, etc.? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal

Re: fedora-productimg-cloud package

2014-11-06 Thread Haïkel
I can comaintain this package. I assume you don't expect me to do any graphic work because it will be awful :o) H. ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct:

Fwd: #6032: Atomic image is missing from the mirrors

2014-11-06 Thread Joe Brockmeier
- Forwarded Message - From: Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 6:14:27 PM Subject: Re: #6032: Atomic image is missing from the mirrors #6032: Atomic image is missing from the mirrors -+---

Debugging the failed Atomic compose

2014-11-06 Thread Colin Walters
Koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7978937 OZ log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8937/7978937/oz-x86_64.log It looks to me like we hung in the rpm -qa listing. Hard to guess why without being able to get in there with a debugger or something =/ Any

Two more (mostly cosmetic) Atomic patches

2014-11-06 Thread Colin Walters
I don't think either of these are the cause of the hang, but I believe they're both correct. Tested with a local ImageFactory run. From 41f019b6d58f59863e282727e695ef196deac87e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:34:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH

Re: fedora-productimg-cloud package

2014-11-06 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:45:28PM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote: So anyway, the question: who wants to own or co-own this package? Owning the package will consist of...? I assume the design folks will continue to actually produce the graphics, etc.? Right -- the package consists of symlinks

attention oddshocks -- [was Re: Two more (mostly cosmetic) Atomic patches]

2014-11-06 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:33:41PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: Subject: [PATCH 2/2] atomic: We do not support pv-grub Atomic is HVM only, since OSTree doesn't understand grub1 at the moment, and incentive to have it do so is low. We need to make sure this is the case in the EC2 image