On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> Hey cloud team,
>
> I think we need some cloud docs. Fedora has a lot to offer in the cloud
> area, and I'm sure that those engaged in the space are excited that
> Fedora has what they are looking for. The uninitiated, on the other
> hand, a
Hey cloud team,
I think we need some cloud docs. Fedora has a lot to offer in the cloud
area, and I'm sure that those engaged in the space are excited that
Fedora has what they are looking for. The uninitiated, on the other
hand, are looking for what Fedora has, and we can do better to
demonstra
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:38 PM, David Gay wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> We sort of ran out of time in today's Cloud WG meeting, but I did want to ask:
>
> What are your thoughts on AMI lifetimes? That is to say, how long should EC2
> AMIs exist before they're deleted? A few points to consider:
>
> - A
Greetings!
We sort of ran out of time in today's Cloud WG meeting, but I did want to ask:
What are your thoughts on AMI lifetimes? That is to say, how long should EC2
AMIs exist before they're deleted? A few points to consider:
- AMIs only cost us for storage, so it's not a *huge* cost to maint
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:04:22PM -0400, Jason Brooks wrote:
> > * jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles
> On this item, I believe that the CentOS folks are interested
> in working together on Dockerfiles maintenance. Perhaps
> CentOS Dockerfiles and Fedora Dockerfiles coul
>
>
> Action Items
>
> * jzb help find scollier additional maintainer for dockerfiles
On this item, I believe that the CentOS folks are interested
in working together on Dockerfiles maintenance. Perhaps
CentOS Dockerfiles and Fedora Dockerfiles could live together
under Project At
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:40:07PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Oh, good. For a minute, I thought I had imagined that we had asked for
> > Atomic & Cloud and was going to feel very bad.
> Still needs someone to create the kickstart file. It looks offhand that
> just copying fedora-cloud-atomic-
===
#fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud SIG
===
Meeting started by kushal at 19:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-03-18/fedora-meeting-1.2015-03-18-19.01.log.html
.
Meetin
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--+
Reporter: kushal| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 03:12:12PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Oh, good. For a minute, I thought I had imagined that we had asked for
> Atomic & Cloud and was going to feel very bad.
Still needs someone to create the kickstart file. It looks offhand that
just copying fedora-cloud-atomic-vagrant
On 03/18/2015 03:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:10:33AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> Hrm. That's a good question. We should also have Vagrant boxes for the
>>> standard Cloud image.
>> There is no such proposed image and it is too late to go adding for Fedora
>> 22.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:10:33AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hrm. That's a good question. We should also have Vagrant boxes for the
> > standard Cloud image.
> There is no such proposed image and it is too late to go adding for Fedora
> 22.
> it needs to be added to rawhide if you want it
On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:26:45 AM Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 04:56 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> > Anyone knows why the standard cloud images are missing from the above
> > mentioned location? I can only see Atomic and Vagrant images.
Cloud base failed to install, seems its fixed in the l
On 03/17/2015 10:55 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
> $ vagrant box add f22atomic
> Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-Vagrant-22_Alpha-20150305.x86_64.rhevm.ova
Ah, yeah - Jason Brooks pointed that out as well. Thanks for the catch!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Project Atomic Doer of Things
j...@redhat.com | http://c
My 2cts as Cloud SIG member is that we shouldn't wait for F23 as long as
it's ready for beta or even shortly before.
This is not just an annoyance, this is an huge impediment toward successful
cloud product.
I kindly ask fesco to take this into consideration
Regards,
H.
_
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
> minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
> course we want Fedora to be internati
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
> "instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
> minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
> course we want Fedora to be internat
The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that
"instlangs" hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a
minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of
course we want Fedora to be international, but there are many cases
like Docker containers where no h
18 matches
Mail list logo
