Re: [cloud] #105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22 ---+ Reporter: jzb| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker| Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Docker Host Image |

Re: [cloud] #105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22 ---+ Reporter: jzb| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker| Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Docker Host Image |

Re: [cloud] #105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22 ---+ Reporter: jzb| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker| Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Docker Host Image |

Re: [cloud] #106: No longer provide 32 bit image

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#106: No longer provide 32 bit image --+ Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: oddshocks Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: normal| Milestone: Future Component: Cloud Base Image |

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

2015-06-17 Thread Adam Miller
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael P. McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [cloud] #106: No longer provide 32 bit image

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#106: No longer provide 32 bit image --+ Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: oddshocks Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: normal| Milestone: Future Component: Cloud Base Image |

Re: using fstrim to save some space in cloud images

2015-06-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Hey all, Have we considered running fstrim against our cloud image filesystems before we package it up? I wrote a small script to do it (inside a container) at [1]. Looks like we can save ~28M: It would need to be incorporated into the image build process because it would affect checksums

Re: using fstrim to save some space in cloud images

2015-06-17 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:12:00PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: Have we considered running fstrim against our cloud image filesystems before we package it up? I wrote a small script to do it (inside a container) at [1]. Looks like we can save ~28M: Yeah, we tried it before, and it was failing in

Re: [cloud] #105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22 ---+ Reporter: jzb| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker| Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Docker Host Image |

using fstrim to save some space in cloud images

2015-06-17 Thread Dusty Mabe
Hey all, Have we considered running fstrim against our cloud image filesystems before we package it up? I wrote a small script to do it (inside a container) at [1]. Looks like we can save ~28M: [root@f22 xzimg]# ls -lh ./ total 1.3G -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 3.0G May 22 00:13 orig.raw -rw-r--r--.

Re: [cloud] #105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22 ---+ Reporter: jzb| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker| Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Docker Host Image |

Re: [cloud] #105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#105: Missing Cockpit RPMs in Fedora Atomic 22 ---+ Reporter: jzb| Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: blocker| Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Docker Host Image |

Re: [Vote] Retire 32 bit images

2015-06-17 Thread milanisko k
HVM being the preferred virt type in EC2, +1 for abandoning 32-bit arch. However, I'm biased in favor of Amazon's infrastructure. Cheers, milan 2015-06-17 11:28 GMT+02:00 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:02:15AM -0400, David Gay wrote: For some time now,

Re: [Vote] Retire 32 bit images

2015-06-17 Thread Haïkel
If that won't cause issues with future ARM images then +1 (ARM will be a strategic target in the short-term) Regards, H. ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: [Vote] Retire 32 bit images

2015-06-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:02:15AM -0400, David Gay wrote: For some time now, there's been discussion of ending production of 32 bit cloud images. Dusty's been kind enough to create a ticket regarding this matter[1]. Thoughts on this? +1/+0/-1? There could be a reason that we shouldn't stop

Re: [cloud] #106: No longer provide 32 bit image

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#106: No longer provide 32 bit image --+ Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: oddshocks Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: normal| Milestone: Future Component: Cloud Base Image |

Re: [cloud] #106: No longer provide 32 bit image

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#106: No longer provide 32 bit image --+ Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: oddshocks Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: normal| Milestone: Future Component: Cloud Base Image |

Re: basic plan for two-week atomic images

2015-06-17 Thread Adam Miller
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Michael P. McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:17:31 AM Subject: Re: basic plan for two-week atomic

Re: [cloud] #96: Atomic as separate spin (or, going the other way, main cloud edition)?

2015-06-17 Thread Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#96: Atomic as separate spin (or, going the other way, main cloud edition)? -+- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: jzb Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- |