Hi All,
I was hoping someone could clarify the use cases for the cloud image,
particularly in light of the reductions being looked at (like removing
python). I ask because I honestly don't know what purpose the cloud
image is serving any longer.
The atomic image is squarely targeted at being
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:10:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Miller
H -- what about making linux-firmware a
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:16:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:44:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at
On 07/10/2015 12:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
The atomic image is squarely targeted at being small, and for running
containers. It is somewhat positioned as a CoreOS solution. With
that being the case, I'm curious how the cloud image is different and
not a repetitive image simply not using the
On 07/10/2015 09:48 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:52:29AM -0500, Major Hayden wrote:
Whenever I've spoken with customers about what they want from an OS
in a virtual machine, they want it to contain a small package set
that lets them run their automation on top of it
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:44:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:10:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
In this case kernel-core could be
2015-07-10 14:28 GMT+02:00 Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org:
OK. So your answer to my immediate question is neutral base that
people have to customize. Fair enough. Now, why would someone wish
to choose a Fedora cloud image over Ubuntu or CoreOS or any of the
other minimal base that
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 12:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
The atomic image is squarely targeted at being small, and for running
containers. It is somewhat positioned as a CoreOS solution. With
that being the case, I'm curious how the
On 07/10/2015 04:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 12:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
The atomic image is squarely targeted at being small, and for running
containers. It is somewhat positioned as a CoreOS solution. With
2015-07-10 15:59 GMT+02:00 Ryan Brown rybr...@redhat.com:
On 07/10/2015 09:48 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:52:29AM -0500, Major Hayden wrote:
Whenever I've spoken with customers about what they want from an OS
in a virtual machine, they want it to contain a small
On 07/10/2015 08:52 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
On 07/10/2015 07:28 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
OK. So your answer to my immediate question is neutral base that
people have to customize. Fair enough. Now, why would someone
wish to choose a Fedora cloud image over Ubuntu or CoreOS or any of
the
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:52:29AM -0500, Major Hayden wrote:
Whenever I've spoken with customers about what they want from an OS
in a virtual machine, they want it to contain a small package set
that lets them run their automation on top of it (i.e. Ansible, Chef,
Puppet). Removing Python
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:44:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at
More globally, our cloud image is still too fat compared to other distros
by a large margin.
What's a data supported target for an appropriate small enough sized
Cloud image?
OK, so I got curious. This is based on AWS, US West (Oregon). I compared
current F22, Ubunutu 14.04, and openSuse
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
provided elsewhere that let you do that already. Conversely, atomic
is compelling _because_ of the Atomic platform. Atomic has novelty
(for now), decent technical advantages, and a lot more marketing
behind it.
Well, I
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 04:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 12:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
The atomic image is squarely targeted at being small, and for
On 07/08/2015 07:17 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
Thus, I'd like to find out whether there are some ideas already how to
gather feedback from your users or whether you plan to do something
where we can participate.
I'm not aware of any, but we should probably discuss this - anybody have
thoughts
On 07/10/2015 05:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 04:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 12:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
The atomic image is
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 05:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2015 04:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com
So what I'm really after is what sets Fedora Cloud apart from every
other distro cloud image. What usecases is it better at than {Ubuntu,
SuSE, whatever}.
Given that logic, Fedora should stop everything but Atomic. The Cloud
image should be Fedora optimized for the cloud instance
2015-07-10 17:59 GMT+02:00 Matt Micene nzwul...@gmail.com:
So what I'm really after is what sets Fedora Cloud apart from every
other distro cloud image. What usecases is it better at than {Ubuntu,
SuSE, whatever}.
Given that logic, Fedora should stop everything but Atomic. The Cloud
On 07/10/2015 04:59 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
I think the Cloud SIG should be jumping up and down on getting SCLs back
on track.
What would this entail? I haven't been following that closely. I'm aware
that SCLs have been... contentious.
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
j...@redhat.com |
TBH, I'm not sure what can be done from the outside either.
Not part of either the SCL team or FPC, all I see is what tickets and
meeting logs I can find. So I'm not close enough to the issues either side
is bringing up to understand if there's a customer argument to be made
for perfect is the
Multiply this by the number of instances, and it could amount to few
thousands dollars per month.
Agreed, that could be an issue.
More globally, our cloud image is still too fat compared to other distros
by a large margin.
I'd like to see data. The end user will wind up paying for all
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:30:43PM -0400, Matt Micene wrote:
So we are currently the smallest uploaded AMI and consuming the least
amount of available space in base, current version, community AMIs.
Now there's a quote. :)
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
Awesome, it wasn't the case a year ago.
H.
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Now we can focus on making the Docker Base image as small as possible to
include heroic efforts ;-)
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Awesome, it wasn't the case a year ago.
H.
___
cloud mailing list
27 matches
Mail list logo
