Re: atomic builds still broken

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Is that the problem that is breaking the builds? How do we get the > location updated? Indeed, the TDL file is broken. I believe for Koji -> ImageFactory, Koji is generating the TDL file from some internal data. Adam?

Re: atomic builds still broken

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> Is that the problem that is breaking the builds? How do we get the >> location updated? > > Indeed, the TDL file is broken. I believe for Koji -> ImageFactory, >

Re: cloud Digest, Vol 69, Issue 10

Alkjsadflkajdflkasjfalsjfaefjwlak On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:29 PM, wrote: > Send cloud mailing list submissions to > cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Ghahahdafse

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Zack Cylinder wrote: > Alkjsadflkajdflkasjfalsjfaefjwlak > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:29 PM, > wrote: > >> Send cloud mailing list submissions to >> cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> To

PRD and Atomic

I know there was just a PRD update. In light of the recent vote to make Atomic the primary focus rather than just a single feature, I think it could use another revision, and submission to the Council for review, particularly as this has a lot of impact on the overall "three editions" Fedora

Re: cloud Digest, Vol 69, Issue 10

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:38:24AM -0500, Zack Cylinder wrote: > Alkjsadflkajdflkasjfalsjfaefjwlak Zack, cat got your keyboard? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: atomic builds still broken

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 12:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > The bad news is that we are still having the same "mounting" problems > that we were seeing in the rawhide builds where sysroot isn't mounted > properly: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235287 Try backporting those systemd

Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

Okay, so, we are getting down to the wire with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Two_Week_Atomic, and particularly with the Flock/post-Flock decision to make Atomic the main thing, there are a few specifics which should be nailed down. Particularly, I want to call attention to this part of

2 week Atomic Host release ready for testing

Latest Atomic Host build is ready for testing: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/fedora-atomic/images/testing/ kernel: 4.1.6-200 docker: 1.7.1-8 etcd: 2.0.13-2 kubernetes: 1.1.0-0.5 cloud-init: 0.7.6-3 ostree: 2015.6-2 atomic: 1.1-1 -Mike ___

Re: [CentOS-devel] Atomic SIG: Joint Test Day with Fedora Atomic Folks

On 08/31/2015 03:40 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: Hi All, There has been some discussion of doing a joint test day with Fedora and CentOS atomic folks. Fedora is having a test day for Fedora Cloud base on 9/8 (all are welcome to join us). We were thinking about having the joint Fedora/CentOS test day

Re: 2 week Atomic Host release ready for testing

On 09/10/2015 02:21 PM, Michael McGrath wrote: > Latest Atomic Host build is ready for testing: Any reason not to put this up on the Atomic blog (with the caveat that this is not considered "ready for prime time")? > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/fedora-atomic/images/testing/ > > kernel:

Re: Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Okay, so, we are getting down to the wire with > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Two_Week_Atomic, and > particularly with the Flock/post-Flock decision to make Atomic the main > thing, there are a few

Re: Two-Week Atomic actual deliverables

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:13:42PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > I think it would be good to have a click-able URL or button here to > take people to the location to report issues. Great suggestion, yeah -- I'll relay that to the web team. > Big shout out to Kushal and dgilmore for doing the bulk

Re: 2 week Atomic Host release ready for testing

- Original Message - > From: "Joe Brockmeier" > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 12:05:08 PM > Subject: Re: 2 week Atomic Host release ready for testing > > On 09/10/2015 02:21 PM, Michael McGrath wrote: > > Latest Atomic Host

Re: PRD and Atomic

2015-09-10 18:49 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller : > I know there was just a PRD update. In light of the recent vote to make > Atomic the primary focus rather than just a single feature, I think it > could use another revision, and submission to the Council for review, >