Re: Why I'm excited about Atomic for Fedora

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:23:59PM -0400, Bruce Harrison wrote: > Although I just downloaded the Fedora Cloud, I want to test it and, > if it is what I am looking for, let some of my customers who live on > DeskTone, give this a test drive from a fast thumb drive on a laptop > or even a modified

Re: Why I'm excited about Atomic for Fedora

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:59:01PM +0530, Aditya Patawari wrote: > For me, I often have to move away from Fedora Cloud or Server editions > because of limited support cycle. I don't want to run a distribution > in my production environment where security updates won't be available > after a short

Re: Functional Requirements for Layered Image Build Service

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2015 12:16 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> Hey everyone. Adam is updating the Layered Image Build service >> Change page for F24. If you're interested in _using_

Re: [cloud] #127: Working with the Server WG

#127: Working with the Server WG ---+- Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component:

Re: [cloud] #127: Working with the Server WG

#127: Working with the Server WG ---+- Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component:

RC6 vagrant images are indexed in atlas - please test

Hi all, We will be indexing our vagrant images in Atlas for the F23 release. We'd like to invite people to try it out with the RC6 vagrant images that I just recently indexed in atlas. Right now these images are in my own repository, but on release they will be under the fedora name so just

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2015-10-28

html version: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-28/cloud_wg.2015-10-28-17.02.html full log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-28/cloud_wg.2015-10-28-17.02.log.html === #fedora-meeting-1: Cloud WG

Re: [cloud] #127: Working with the Server WG

#127: Working with the Server WG ---+- Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component:

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > During today's Cloud Working Group meeting we had a short but spirited > discussion on the roles of the Cloud and Server Working Group and the > editions we're producing. > > I wanted to open a discussion on

Re: Functional Requirements for Layered Image Build Service

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jay Greguske wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/28/2015 12:16 PM, Adam Miller wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >>> Hey everyone. Adam is updating the

Fedora 23 Final RC6 call for testing

Hi folks! We have what should hopefully be the final RC for Fedora 23 available for testing now. It would be really great if folks could help us run as many of the validation tests as possible ahead of the Go/No- Go meeting tomorrow. Here are the result pages:

Re: Why I'm excited about Atomic for Fedora

On 10/28/2015 02:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:59:01PM +0530, Aditya Patawari wrote: >> For me, I often have to move away from Fedora Cloud or Server editions >> because of limited support cycle. I don't want to run a distribution >> in my production environment where

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship

On 10/28/2015 03:03 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > Could you provide a bit more context without necessarily offering your > suggestions? It's somewhat hard to discuss this without it going > everywhere without some kind of background into the overlaps or > disparities that you see. I can try to give

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud and Server Workgroup relationship

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 10/28/2015 03:03 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Could you provide a bit more context without necessarily offering your >> suggestions? It's somewhat hard to discuss this without it going >> everywhere without some kind of

Re: RC* Atomic images are broken

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:45:09PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Right now the last booting atomic image is TC11. If we don't do > another compose then we won't have an atomic image for release. Can we release the two-week-atomic autocloud build? -- Matthew Miller