On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, 5:49 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
It seems to me the easier thing to do is tolerate baking more stuff
into the images and ISO.
OK I just rewound this in my head, and said WTS out loud. There's one cloud
atomic tree, right? So adding a bunch of hardware stuff affects that whole
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> Also since cloud image is the most downloaded one, how about
> providing a .iso file with pre-loaded user/passwd, so that people
> willing to use cloud-image in non-cloud env (local, virt-mgr etc) can use
> the iso file as the cloud-init dat
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, P J P wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:03 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> >Why not provide a image that has root or non-root user with std. passwd ?
> >whats the problem with that ?
>
>
> Default root password could become a security risk. Rarely people chan
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 10:03 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>Why not provide a image that has root or non-root user with std. passwd ?
>whats the problem with that ?
Default root password could become a security risk. Rarely people change
such settings. It'd depend on the implementation, but ju
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:36:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > > for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided Vagrant images.
>> > > They're basically made for t
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:36:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided Vagrant images.
> > > They're basically made for this case. Or, second, you can use the
> > > "testcloud" tool to launc
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:41:30AM +, P J P wrote:
> > Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about
> > Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this,
> > if not, do I file one?
>
> Hey, thanks for pass
On 12/15/2015 05:20 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be
> downloaded at:
>
> https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html
>
> Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stab
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:52:43AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> >A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the
>> > hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt)
>> >B. Finishing Atomic overlay suppor
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:52:43AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> >A. Separate hardware/virt trees; have the installer ISO point at the
> > hardware one by default (but also have the option of virt)
> >B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an
> >overlay
> >C. Getting all
Matthew,
On 2015-12-16 01:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:11:04PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Should I just file bugs like that for each one of these other missing
components, and set them to block a tracker bug for things to include
on the ISO? In my view a baremetal insta
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> I'd like to propose that a small subset of LABEL values be added to the
> Dockerfile, to support the generic labels defined here ->
> https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels
>
> I think adding name, version, release, a
A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be
downloaded at:
https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html
Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:
https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Cloud-Images/x86_64/Images/Fedora-Cloud-Images-x86_64-23
I'd like to propose that a small subset of LABEL values be added to the
Dockerfile, to support the generic labels defined here ->
https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels
I think adding name, version, release, architecture, build-date, vendor,
url and summary would be a g
See:
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6313
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 01:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> See:
> ___
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> B. Finishing Atomic overlay support; making hardware enablement an overlay
This could be highly useful for supporting things that need to be added for
support of the base daemon set of an Atomic host, e.g. gluster clients and
fuse for GlusterFS persistent storage support. But I think we'd ne
On 14/12/15, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 01:53 +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> >
> > > The thing is that it's almost impossible to say "if we just run all X
> > > tests, we can guarantee everything is fine!" in real life, especially
> > > at the level of something as complex as an en
Hi all,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Local_Test_Cloud
Interesting tool. Hadn't seen it before.
I've also been working on a similar feature for the Atomic
image (although it should work just fine for the Base images
as well if we want). Basically, it adds a new boot menu item
labeled
On 12/14/2015 08:00 PM, Itamar wrote:
> +1 for systemd-networkd, RH should add it into rhel.
That's not really our call. :-)
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
signature.asc
Descripti
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:36:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided Vagrant images.
> > They're basically made for this case. Or, second, you can use the
> > "testcloud" tool to launch the local
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Local_Test
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:11:04PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Should I just file bugs like that for each one of these other missing
> components, and set them to block a tracker bug for things to include
> on the ISO? In my view a baremetal installation is first a server, so
> it should have basi
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:41:30AM +, P J P wrote:
>> Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about
>> Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this,
>> if not, do I file one?
>
> Hey, thanks for passing
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20151215T17Z
DTEND:20151215T18Z
DTSTAMP:20151215T132315Z
ORGANIZER;CN=acar...@redhat.com:mailto:acar...@redhat.com
UID:fc61nmb1eusr8h9pn975g61...@google.com
A
Hello Matthew,
> On Tuesday, 15 December 2015 6:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Hey, thanks for passing on the feedback. We basically have two answers
> for this. First, you can use Vagrant, and the provided Vagrant images.
> They're basically made for this case. Or, second, you can use the
> "te
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for replying. I also saw the hack with privileged containers too.
I was
not sure how "production ready" this was and if it would become somehow
a
general practice.
Vincent
On 2015-12-15 13:36, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:55:29PM +0100, Vincent Van der
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:41:30AM +, P J P wrote:
> Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about
> Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this,
> if not, do I file one?
Hey, thanks for passing on the feedback. We basically have two answers
for this. First,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:55:29PM +0100, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote:
> I initially wanted to use Gluster because it kind of fits the use
> case. But unfortunaly the Gluster packages were not available in the
> Atomic image so I used NFS for now. Would it be possible to add the
> needed packages
Hello,
Today in another conversation[1], I received this feedback about
Fedora cloud images. Not sure if there is bug open for this,
if not, do I file one?
[1] https://pjps.wordpress.com/2015/12/15/fad-singapore-2015/
+-- On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Deepak C Shetty wrote --+
| ...
| How about having
29 matches
Mail list logo