On 2016-02-03 1:37, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 02/03/2016 09:24 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
Makes no sense to me.
It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense.
>
Can you describe the use case for an EOL r
I'm not asking for the images to be continually supported. Just not
deleted. Maybe they can be placed into a separate "archive" AWS account?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
> The transparency argument does make sense, but yes then the "stock Fedora
> AMI" is dependent on the
The transparency argument does make sense, but yes then the "stock Fedora
AMI" is dependent on the projects update and lifecycle policy.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> We do take images of fully set-up VMs that are used in experiments. But
> there is also the use case of
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -, han...@ucsc.edu wrote:
> > What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora
> > VM images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even
> > though it is not even two year
We do take images of fully set-up VMs that are used in experiments. But
there is also the use case of being able to start from a well-known,
published AMI and running through the scripted setup again, maybe with
small tweaks. This increases the transparency of an experiment. Saying to a
fellow rese
>
> big data genomics community where an experiment that can't be verified by
> a 2nd party is a bad experiment. Like everywhere in science. VMs are a
> great way to provide that reproducibility.
Have you looked at AMI snapshots for reproducing experiment environments?
Once the baseline environ
Whether something makes sense is subjective.
But as to your 2nd point. One word: Reproducibility. I am in the big data
genomics community where an experiment that can't be verified by a 2nd
party is a bad experiment. Like everywhere in science. VMs are a great way
to provide that reproducibility.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> 2nd use case: At event a team wants to share, or cooperate together
> without messing with the local network - instead using this box AP
> witch gives you team tools, eg. etherpad, chat, logging, and anything
> that can be necessary. If its ab
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
> > Makes no sense to me.
> It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense.
> Can you describe the use case for an EOL release that might per
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -, han...@ucsc.edu wrote:
> What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora
> VM images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even
> though it is not even two years old. Ubuntu is keeping the images
> around much longer.
Which
On 02/03/2016 09:24 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
>
> So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
> Makes no sense to me.
It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense.
Can you describe the use case for an EOL release that might persuade us
that we shou
Hi Jan,
So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it? Makes
no sense to me.
-- Hannes
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> Fedora-21 is now EOL. So, it makes complete sense to me these images
> are already not available.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
Hi Hannes,
Fedora-21 is now EOL. So, it makes complete sense to me these images
are already not available.
Regards,
Jan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:19 AM, wrote:
> What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora VM
> images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone e
13 matches
Mail list logo
