; Fedora Release Engineering
The Vagrant Atlas page with the new atomic host:
https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/23-atomic-host/versions/20160420
vagrant init fedora/23-atomic-host; vagrant up
or, if you already have the box, to get the new one:
vagrant box u
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 04:46 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:35:45AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I would kinda quibble with that page. I would especially disagree with
> > > the text "To put it simply: These are the architectures for which
> > > Fedora
A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be
downloaded at:
Images can be found here:
https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html
Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:
Follows:
Meeting summary
ACTION: jzb to create Wiki page for OpenShift work (jberkus,
17:09:58)
action items from last week (jberkus, 17:11:16)
ACTION: jberkus to create Kubernetes examples for Fedora.
(jberkus, 17:12:15)
ACTION: kushal to update ticket that we are
According to the downloads page:
"The latest two week build did not meet our testing criteria. The images
available are from over 14 days ago. Check the Project Atomic blog for
updates and information about Atomic blocker bugs."
Can someone let me know what's going on?
--
--
Josh Berkus
#154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
---+-
Reporter: jberkus| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Docker Host Image | Keywords:
#152: Fedora Coud Test Day for F24
---+---
Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: kushal
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: ---| Resolution:
Keywords: meeting|
#151: Need owner to define basic container smoke testing requirements
-+--
Reporter: acarter | Owner: maxamillion
Type: task | Status: accepted
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Resolution:
#151: Need owner to define basic container smoke testing requirements
-+-
Reporter: acarter | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
#153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
-+-
Reporter: goern| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
#150: Docker container refresh cadence
+-
Reporter: acarter | Owner:
Type: task| Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Docker (Other) | Resolution: fixed
Keywords:
#153: design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
+-
Reporter: goern | Owner:
Type: task| Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Keywords: meeting
#131: make docker archived image get imported with lowercase tag
---+--
Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: maxamillion
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: ---| Resolution:
Hey all,
In all-day meetings today and may be able to peek in on IRC but won't be
able to pay 100% attention to the meeting today. Sorry for short notice.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:35:45AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I would kinda quibble with that page. I would especially disagree with
> > the text "To put it simply: These are the architectures for which
> > Fedora will delay a release if they are not functional." That is *not*
> > the actual
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:33:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures
> >
> > When I read that, i686 sure doesn't seem like it's primary. But you're
> > right, it's definitely not secondary.
>
> I would kinda quibble with that page. I would especially
16 matches
Mail list logo
