maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> We should do what's needed to ensure that our images pick up the most recent
> rpms -- when you say rebuild all content, do you mean rebuild the rpms
> themselves, or rebuild all the images?
Sorry for lack of clarification, I m
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:37:31AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> Here is a summary of what is in updates-testing vs what is in updates:
> [...]
>> To rebase to the updates-testing tree just run:
>> rpm-ostree rebase fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/test
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We should do what's needed to ensure that our images pick up the most recent
rpms -- when you say rebuild all content, do you mean rebuild the rpms
themselves, or rebuild all the images?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
Currently the plan is to sync all container images from Fedora's Registry to
the Docker Hub. Do we want to do this under the current [fedora
namespace](https://hub.docker.com/u/fedora/) or create a new
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
Following along with the [proposal that reached general consensus on the
mailing
list](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2QXK5JSLBMPSNYOWIF3272R45PQT6UZ
On 07/02/17, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hey team,
>
> Right now some very critical pieces of Atomic Host have packages
> that are in testing. It would be great if we can get some people
> to take the updates-testing tree for a spin and report any issues.
>
>
> Here is a summary of what is in updates-te
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
The upstream OSBS development group has had to push out the deadlines for the
automated rebuild work and Factory 2.0 isn't ready yet (it wasn't planned to
be, but it is noted for posterity) which means
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:37:31AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Here is a summary of what is in updates-testing vs what is in updates:
[...]
> To rebase to the updates-testing tree just run:
> rpm-ostree rebase fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/testing/docker-host
Hmmm — I wonder if we could adopt fedora-easy
Hey team,
Right now some very critical pieces of Atomic Host have packages
that are in testing. It would be great if we can get some people
to take the updates-testing tree for a spin and report any issues.
Here is a summary of what is in updates-testing vs what is in updates:
Changed:
atomi
strigazi added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
The docker and docker-latest are both at docker 1.12.6, could it be docker at
1.12.6 and docker latest at 1.13 ?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/196
10 matches
Mail list logo