Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Regis
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Regis
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Regis
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
+1 to jberkus' proposal. :thumbsup:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/295
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraprojec
The issue: `Disable deltarpms in the Fedora base docker image` of project:
`atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/297
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
The issue: `Move redis httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub
into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been reset by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/215
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I'm +1 to this
Also note, that I created `ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org` months ago and
discussed it at one of the meetings but we never really moved over. It's there,
it's just "inactive" because there's been zero email to it s
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I meant to update this ticket, I'll get this out to the Infra as soon as we're
out of Infrastructure Freeze. (Post Fedora 26 Release, so later this week)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Regis
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
PR Submitted to imagefactory to add this functionality.
https://github.com/redhat-imaging/imagefactory/pull/402
Once merged, we'll get the configurations in place with
[pungi-fedora](https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora)
``
To rep
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out yesterday[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora R
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Do you want this to be a LABEL or an ENV?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/276
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedorap
The issue: `Set architecture label in the base container image` of project:
`atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/276
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
The issue: `Fedora OSBS RFE: install go-md2man to buildroot image` of project:
`atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/284
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
The status of the issue: `Enforce ENV usage as a requirement for release label`
of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/277
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Done
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/277
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Registry.
Base Images:
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> Thanks Adam for the quick resolution. Would it be easy to
> have an automated workflow to gate these updates on some
> quick sanity tests? E.g. push to `:next` first, run some
> tests, and then push to `:latest`?
+1
That's the plan, we want
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Multi-Arch Container Layered Image Build System
In this session, the multi-architecture version of Fedora Layered Image Build
System (FLIBS) will be introduced. We will discuss the technical
implementation, the features provided,
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 was recently updated to
> some 10 month old version f3535ce68198 where packages cannot be
> installed due to missing
> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-25-x86_64:
>
> https:
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Currently I am busy with higher priority work, most notably I am working with
upstream on the [OSBS Orchestrator and Worker Cluster
Split](https://osbs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/multiarch.html#worker-build) as
well as the [OSBS Au
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out earlier today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedo
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
Currently the [Container Guidelines on LABELS
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Guidelines#LABELS] *recommend* the use
of `ENV` declarations for the `release` but it appears as though this should
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> >
>> > Is the infrastructure now ready for the respin?
>>
>> It appears the builds are still failing because of
>> https://bugzilla.red
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:04:19AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> El mié, 10-05-2017 a las 22:47 -0500, Adam Miller escribió:
>> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jan Pazdziora
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>
The issue: `osbs: ensure the bump_release plugin is installed in OSBS` of
project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/274
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:59:36PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> >> Hello all,
>> &
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
>> Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
>> Imag
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
>> Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
>>
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out yesterday[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora R
Hello all,
The migration of the docker namespace in DistGit, cgit, PackageDB
and Container Guidelines is now complete. This migration is at the
request of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] to highlight that Fedora is
targeting all OCI[1] compliant container runtimes instead of any
specific one.
For thos
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
LGTM :thumbsup:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/264
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This is a request we would need to file with [Fedora
Infrastructure](https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure) if it's something we
actually want. No one in the WG has the capabilities to do this in an official
capacity.
``
To re
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435310
> raised the issue that apparently, Atomic Host isn't "release blocking".
> I think we have plenty of resources to match whatever criteria
> there are for that for Fedora 27. Thoughts?
D
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out yesterday[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora R
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Fixed
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/240
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
https://taiga.fedorainfracloud.org/project/acarter-fedora-docker-atomic-tooling/us/779
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/236
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
What @jasonbrooks said.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/248
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out yesterday[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora R
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 17:32 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
>> Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the first ever Fedora Layered
>> Im
The issue: `The build system should provide an automatically populated VERSION
label` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by
maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/249
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We can not currently, absolutely need to. I'll add this to the TODO list. Will
update later with a Taiga card in the Fedora RelEng Tools space for context and
on-going work.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> Hi Adam & co.,
>
> I think the container guidelines should include a section about the Layered
> Images used as a base for other Layered Builds. I've created an updated
> draft that also fixes label names to use the lower-case convention:
>
>
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out yesterday[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora R
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> There is an outstanding bug report
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423753 that came up in
> the Fedora Server meeting today.
>
> Does someone know who can make this fixed? And who owns the Amazon AMI
> account so it can
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the first ever Fedora Layered
Image Release. Each Container Image is released with the following
streams which aim to provide lifecycle management choices to our
users:
Name
Name
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> After some discussions with mattdm and sgallagh about the cloud base
> image and the server WG we have decided for now to leave the cloud
> base image out of the server WG. Obviously it doesn't make sense to
> have it stay as owned by the Atomi
The issue: `Move redis httpd container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub
into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by
maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/215
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproj
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Note that the Review Requiest in from jhogarth would replace the owncloud
Dockerfile from GitHub.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/225
The issue: `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into
DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been reset by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
The status of the issue: `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles
GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by
maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedora
The issue: `Move registry container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into
DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by
maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
bowlofeggs has already started a review request for the registry:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420568
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219
The status of the issue: `Move atpmic_scan_openscap container image from
Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been
updated to: Closed as Duplicate by maxamillion.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/213
___
cloud mailing l
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/atomic_scan_openscap
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/224
___
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/container-best-practices
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/223
___
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/systemd/apache
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/222
_
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/earthquake
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/220
_
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/registry
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/219
___
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/postgresql
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/218
_
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/redis
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/215
__
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/atomic_scan_openscap
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/213
___
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/tools
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/214
__
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/qpid
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/212
___
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/rabbitmq
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/211
___
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/systemd/systemd
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/210
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/mariadb
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/208
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/couchdb
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/207
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/nginx
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206
__
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/memcached
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/205
__
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/ssh
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/204
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/master/apache
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/203
_
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> We should do what's needed to ensure that our images pick up the most recent
> rpms -- when you say rebuild all content, do you mean rebuild the rpms
> themselves, or rebuild all the images?
Sorry for lack of clarification, I m
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
Currently the plan is to sync all container images from Fedora's Registry to
the Docker Hub. Do we want to do this under the current [fedora
namespace](https://hub.docker.com/u/fedora/) or create a new
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
Following along with the [proposal that reached general consensus on the
mailing
list](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2QXK5JSLBMPSNYOWIF3272R45PQT6UZ
maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
The upstream OSBS development group has had to push out the deadlines for the
automated rebuild work and Factory 2.0 isn't ready yet (it wasn't planned to
be, but it is noted for posterity) which means
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Recently I attempted to start a mailing list thread that was the
>> product of a discussion on IRC about putting together an Atomic WG
&
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> Hello all,
> Recently I attempted to start a mailing list thread that was the
> product of a discussion on IRC about putting together an Atomic WG
> workshop session[0] at DevConf[1].
>
> This was then discussed during
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:50:03 -0600
> Adam Miller wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Cards created should be units of work that can feasibly be
>> accomplished in a day or less worth of work.
>>
>> I would
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 01/11/2017 05:50 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Recently I attempted to start a mailing list thread that was the
>> product of a discussion on IRC about putting together an Atomic WG
>>
Hello all,
Recently I attempted to start a mailing list thread that was the
product of a discussion on IRC about putting together an Atomic WG
workshop session[0] at DevConf[1].
This was then discussed during today's Atomic WG Meeting[2] where it
was decided that we should make this Workshop i
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>During the last Fedora Cloud/Atomic WG meeting jberkus brought up
>> the idea of having a workshop at DevConf to tackle some Layered Image
&
maxamillion added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Proposal for Workshop to work on this stuff at DevConf sent to the mailing list
->
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WBTWBLOYWG66EDXJO2I4G3XY3X6EFAIF/
``
To reply, visit the link b
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 01/10/2017 10:52 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:44:03AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:33:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> USAGE: single command line giving usage example
>>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> Hello all,
>During the last Fedora Cloud/Atomic WG meeting jberkus brought up
> the idea of having a workshop at DevConf to tackle some Layered Image
> items which we, at the time, seemed in agreement on. Josh and I were
>
Hello all,
During the last Fedora Cloud/Atomic WG meeting jberkus brought up
the idea of having a workshop at DevConf to tackle some Layered Image
items which we, at the time, seemed in agreement on. Josh and I were
talking on irc today and I wanted to make a proposal to the list and
find out wh
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Looking at the new FDLIBS, I'm noticing that there's not a narrative
> description of the image required or provided anywhere that I can find.
> Clearly one is needed for users. So, here's a proposal:
>
> New Required LABELs:
>
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Adam Miller
>> wrote:
>>> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
>>> of the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Trishna Guha wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> Contributors will go through a simliar process as what they currently do
>> with RPM Review Requests. There will be Container Reviews as well as
>&
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Trishna Guha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in Fedora Cloud FAD 2016, We had decided to focus on
> Documentation for Fedora Atomic working group.
>
> Our Documentation is live on [1]. This is the work done so far on
> documentation.
> We have some Pull requests ope
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
>> of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
>&g
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/2016 02:36 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
>> It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
>> of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
>>
It is with great pleasure that the Fedora Project Announces the availability
of the Fedora Docker Layered Image Build Service[0] to the Fedora Contributor
Community!
With this announcement we are opening availability of the Docker Layered
Image Build Service for the Docker Layered Images[1] that t
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:31 PM, wrote:
>
> A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be
> downloaded at:
>
> Images can be found here:
>
> https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html
>
> Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:
> https://alt.fedorap
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> The main thing that concern I have is that with modularity there is
>> going to be a concept of "base runtime" which will have a "generatio
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:43:55PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>>> > I'm not sure we should put base distro and distro version as the
>>> > p
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:43:55PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> > I'm not sure we should put base distro and distro version as the
>> > primary distinguisher. As a user, it's the application (and poss
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:06:41AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> For layered images, we would follow something similar to:
>>
>> registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora/24/httpd:latest
>> registry.fedoraproj
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/30/2016 08:58 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> On 09/29/2016 08:18 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
>>>> On behalf of the Fedora Cloud Working Group, I am happ
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/29/2016 06:03 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> I was recently discussing some items around docker layered image
>&
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
