Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and possible solutions

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:53:21PM -0500, David Gay wrote: >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Joe Brockmeier" >> > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 2:47:00 PM >> > Subject: Re: 32 bit AMI registratio

Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and possible solutions

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:43 PM, David Gay wrote: > Hi -- these beta AMIs need to be done today. 64 bit base AMIs have been > successfully uploaded, but I *still* haven't nailed the problem with the 32 > bit registration method. Or rather, I've isolated the problem, but haven't > found a solutio

Important: community cloud credentials

Hi, all. This week, the Cloud Working Group migrated from shared credentials to individual credentials in our AWS account. If you have previously used the shared credentials and would like to have a new individual account created, please file a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/newticket

Re: help wanted -- test/karma docker-storage-setup

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:34:32AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> As Joe noted the other day, Fedora Atomic is intended to come with this >> service, which will create storage space for Docker images. As >> mentioned in the IRC meeting, at this

Re: [DRAFT] Changes to Working Group structure

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 10/10/2014 10:32 AM, Andy Grimm wrote: >> Is there an established time-limit on voting for the ticket case? >> Still "a few days"? > > We haven't established it. How about 72 hours? (not counting >

Re: [DRAFT] Changes to Working Group structure

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed last week, we need to make some changes to the language > about choosing members of the CWG. > > Current: > > Membership > -- > > The Fedora Cloud Working Group has nine voting members, one selected by > the

security criteria for cloud image updates

In today's Cloud WG meeting, we discussed our cloud base image update policy, and generally agreed on "~1 month + any security/major bugfix". Major bugfix can remain pretty fluid, but we'd like to tighten up the security criteria. The cloud base image is small, but it still has dozens of packages

Re: docker image questions!

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > See https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/65 > > Adam asks: > >What "Fedora" exactly is the image going to contain? Fedora Server? >Fedora Cloud? Will it be a part of either of those products? If not, what >is its status, exact

Re: WORKING rawhide cloud image -- let's get it in shape for alpha

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > This one boots and works! > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7078357 > > On my very first test, I couldn't ssh in after boot even though the instance > was up in openstack. That's a little concerning but I can't reproduce

Re: Fedora @ Google Cloud

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Renich Bon Ciric wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Filipe Brandenburger > wrote: >> Last time I tried it, it seems that the main limitation of cloud-init >> is that it wants you to define the list of users to be created >> statically, while GCE wants to g

Re: Packaging Google-Daemon

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Renich Bon Ciric wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Vaidas Jablonskis > wrote: >> I have done that already some time ago: >> https://github.com/vaijab/google-compute-daemon-rpm > > > Ah, great. I see you kept the /usr/share/google dir. It might be a > good

Re: Fedora @ Google Cloud

dy On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Vaidas Jablonskis wrote: > I wrote cloud-init support for GCE (it is upstream already), so let me know > if you need any help. > > > On 23 June 2014 15:50, Andy Grimm wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrot

Re: Fedora @ Google Cloud

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 05:05:36 -0700 > Colin Walters wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014, at 01:49 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> > >> > The issue is we are trying to build one image to run in al

Re: Default cloud user name

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:57:29AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >> How about we do-away with the 'faux user which is and is not root even > >> though they are a trivial unpasswo

Re: zeroing out the cloud image filesystem

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:18:04AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > 2) I also commented out the "Zeroing out empty space" postinstall > stuff, > > > because it drastically increases the image build time for not much > benefit, > > > IMHO.

Re: Fedora 19 image on EC2

I made an effort to get a Fedora 19 image running in EC2 this week, and in the end, I undid a couple of the recent changes to make it work for me. Here's a brief overview of what I did: 1) appliance-creator was giving me an error when the "part" line of the kickstart had no "ondisk" option, so I a

Re: Semi-Official Fedora 18 downloadable cloud images

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:51:14PM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote: >> Just a quick data point here: I downloaded the raw.xz onto a CentOS 6 >> system, and ran unxz on it. It seems the version of xz there does not >>

Re: Semi-Official Fedora 18 downloadable cloud images

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > This is a basic Fedora 18 spin designed to work in OpenStack and other > private cloud environments. It's configured with cloud-init so it will take > advantage of ec2-compatible metadata s

Re: future of Boxgrinder ... building cloud images

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > in the IRC channel, I am advised by 'msavy' that Boxgrinder is on a path to > end as a project, and transition into: > http://imgfac.org/ > > which uses underneath: oz > https://github.com/clalancette/oz > > Seemingly also, the

Re: yum-cron in the cloud images?

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > On 2012-12-16 10:21, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:02:01PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: What if we did security updates only, by default? (Right now, yum-cron doesn't support this, so it'd be a F

Re: cloud-init package dependencies

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:28:49AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:16:21AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > cloud-init pulls in some, um, not exactly minimal stuff. python-cheetah? >> > (which then brings in, for e

Re: removing NetworkManager from cloud image?

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:34 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> >>> F17 is not ready for automated deployment and hands off yum updates at the >>> customer's sole management -- it hangs wayy too often. >>> >>> In part I don't understand why F17 i

Re: removing NetworkManager from cloud image?

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:17 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 01:41:31PM -0400, Andy Grimm wrote: >>> This feels like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693602 all >>> over agai

Re: removing NetworkManager from cloud image?

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > The simple old-fashioned network configuration works just fine for basic > cloud use-cases which I can think of, and NetworkManager a) brings in a lot > of dependencies of little value in this case (e.g. ModemManager, > wpa_supplicant). Plus

Re: tool for image building and update

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Tomas Karasek wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking at possibilities of automation of disk image creation > (installation) and update. > > I ran across tools from Aeolus: > imagefactory - http://www.aeolusproject.org/imagefactory.html > and Oz - http://www.aeolusproje

Re: RFC: Cloud Interop FAD

Overall, I definitely like the idea of developing $PaaS on $IaaS narratives for Fedora, as we so often see that people using a cloud don't architect their apps for a cloud. Anything we can do to promote "proper" cloud apps is a good thing. I don't know much about Openshift yet, but wonder if the

Re: [Openstack] centos 6 images

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Scott Moser wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2012, Pádraig Brady wrote: > >> On 05/22/2012 03:39 PM, Andy Grimm wrote: >> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> >> On 05/22/2012 04:07 AM, Jason Ford wrote: >> &

Re: [Openstack] centos 6 images

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 05/22/2012 04:07 AM, Jason Ford wrote: >> I am trying to put together an image for centos 6 that works like cloud-init >> on ubuntu does. Currently I have ssh keys getting imported but having some >> problems getting the disk to dynamica

Re: SSH Fingerprint

ist.github.com/2345554 > > I'm using a small instance. > > It this something that is a known issue? Or do people generally build their > own instances using BoxGrinder? > > -- > Alan Gutierrez - @bigeasy > > > On Monday, April 9, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andy Grim

Re: SSH Fingerprint

The SSH host keys are printed to the console during boot, so you can use "euca-get-console-output " to see this. It will have two separate keys. You want to add the one starting with "ssh-rsa" to your ~/.ssh/known_hosts. Scripting it like this worked for me: IID=i-5b46873c # your instance ID g

Re: Fedora 17 Beta RC images

I tested that both booted and I could log in. Is there other specific testing that we care about? Volume attachment? User data ? On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hey all, > > I have uploaded some Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate images to > us-east-1 please test. > > 32

Re: help needed

In case somebody wants to do other testing, I applied the patch to cloud-init and made this AMI public: ami-ab4698c2 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Andy Grimm wrote: > SOLVED! > > From /usr/share/doc/cloud-init-0.6.3/ChangeLog : > > "read /etc/ssh/sshd_config for Autho

Re: help needed

How do you want to handle this? Should I go ahead and file both RHBZ and LP issues for it? --Andy On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Andy Grimm wrote: > Further attempting to localize the problem, I found a pickled form of > the metadata in /var/lib/cloud/instances/i-325d4c56/obj.pkl wh

Re: help needed

Further attempting to localize the problem, I found a pickled form of the metadata in /var/lib/cloud/instances/i-325d4c56/obj.pkl which included the public ssh key, so it's definitely getting the data from the metadata service. On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Andy Grimm wrote: > On Fri

Re: help needed

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Tim Flink wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:54:47 -0400 > Andy Grimm wrote: > >> Of those differences, I suspect that lack of a zeroconf route >> (169.254.0.0/16) is probably preventing access to the metadata >> service.  Further, I belie

Re: help needed

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Heherson Pagcaliwagan wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Heherson Pagcaliwagan > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Garrett Holmstrom >> wrote: >>> On Mar 28, 2012 9:06 PM, "Heherson Pagcaliwagan" wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:22 AM,