s <m...@kushaldas.in> wrote:
> On 03/02/16, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -, han...@ucsc.edu wrote:
> > &
Jan Kuřík
> Platform & Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
> ___
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@l
"stock Fedora
> AMI" is dependent on the projects update and lifecycle policy.
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Hannes Schmidt <han...@ucsc.edu> wrote:
>
>> We do take images of fully set-up VMs that are used in experiments. But
>> there is also the use case
3, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 09:24 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
> > Makes no sense to me.
>
> It's no longer receiving updates, so that does
;
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> ___
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Hannes Schmidt
Software Engine
