On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 00:41 -0400, Michael Hampton wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 12:26 AM, James Antill wrote:
> > I would also disagree strongly that RHEL will ever follow this model. I
> > would bet a huge amount of money that if customers are using the
> > official trees at al
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 17:33 -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> One of the things that came out of the weekly meeting with infra/releng
> and folks working on Atomic is what I think may be a mis-match in
> expectations on upgrades/release process for the Atomic host.
>
> As called out in
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:40 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since Sandro Mathys (red_trela) stepped down from the Working Group,
> we're missing a member.
> During last week meeting, Andy Grimm (agrimm, fas: arg) candidated to
> replace him and taking ownership of Sandro's tasks.
>
> According
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 15:23 +, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Mike Ruckman
> wrote:
>
> > * Crucial basic Docket Host Image decisions (jzb, 08:07:23)
> > * https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/47 (jzb, 08:07:36)
> > * AGREED: fedora atomic docker-specific image
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 17:16 -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Been a while since we met regularly (or irregularly at regular
> intervals) and we should probably start doing that again. Who's
> available to meet this week at the usual time on Thursday?
I can be there.
_
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 13:10 -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> OK, the votes are in and it looks like the least-bad time for meetings
> right now are 14:00 UTC on Thursdays. I think we were missing a few
> votes, though, so I hope this time will work for the most people.
Given no objec
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 13:29 -0500, Sam Kottler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you probably know, we've been working on the product requirements document
> for the last few months, and particularly heavily over the last 2 or 3 weeks.
> It's not yet in a final state, but I'd like to gather initial +1/-1'
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 13:45 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:13:40PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > So we are not going to be able to do this period. you will only be
> > > > able to release as Fedora itself releases. doing periodic updated
> > > > images can be doab
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 09:06 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Hi everyone. It looks like it works for most of the WG members to meet at
> 19:00 GMT (3pm EDT) this week. We'll use #fedora-meeting-1 (because the
> FESCo meeting in #fedora-meeting has been running more than an hour) and
> I'll say someth
Matthew Miller wrote:
> I've been the defacto maintainer of the Fedora cloud image kickstart
> for the past year or so (I have commit access, and I use it!), and I
> think that's gotten into fairly decent shape. This WG will be about
> going beyond decent and into something that's actually both ver
10 matches
Mail list logo
