Re: Latest fedora 38/rawhide containers do not work with systemd

2023-02-09 Thread Jan Pazdziora
/rawhide container worked was January 25. It's been reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165004. -- Jan Pazdziora | Sr. Principal Software Engineer | Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org T

registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 cannot install packages

2017-06-08 Thread Jan Pazdziora
Hello, it seems registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 was recently updated to some 10 month old version f3535ce68198 where packages cannot be installed due to missing /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-25-x86_64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460094 -- Jan Pazdziora

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-05-24 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:27:13AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > > > > The bugzilla was addressed -- can we give > > > > registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26 > > > > another try? > > Yes

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-05-23 Thread Jan Pazdziora
ressed -- can we give registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26 another try? -- Jan Pazdziora Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-05-15 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:04:19AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El mié, 10-05-2017 a las 22:47 -0500, Adam Miller escribió: > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jan Pazdziora > > wrote: > > > > > > One problem with the current Fedora 26 image is that it enables

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-05-09 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:59:36PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release > &

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-05-04 Thread Jan Pazdziora
and if we do not want to encourage the use of RUN dnf upgrade -y in every Dockerfile, we might want to make it easy for people to consume fresh content. Incidently, registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 is rather new, just 13 days old. -- Jan Pazdziora Senior Principal Software E

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-05-04 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:03:48AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > > > > If we are building building images > > > > FROM fedora:25 > > > > should we start using > > > > FROM regi

Re: Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release

2017-04-28 Thread Jan Pazdziora
wer Fedora 25 image than registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora. Is that expected? If we are building building images FROM fedora:25 should we start using FROM registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 instead in Dockerfiles? If merely fedora does not point to whatever is the authoritat

[atomic-wg] Issue #233 `Container guidelines for systemd based containers`

2017-03-02 Thread Jan Pazdziora
adelton added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > BTW Even if we got oci-systemd-hook into debian, we would still need to get > projectatomic/docker in since docker rejected the patch to run hooks directly. Would it help if the execution of the hook was dependent on some label in t

Re: No Fedora 24 container?

2016-06-22 Thread Jan Pazdziora
et Alpha even after Beta is out might be useful. I'd propose to remove all pre-release tags one month after the GA (fedora:25 in this example) has been made available. -- Jan Pazdziora Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: selinux denials when starting docker in F23

2015-10-09 Thread Jan Pazdziora
"net:[4026531957]" dev="nsfs" > ino=4026531957 scontext=system_u:system_r:iptables_t:s0 > tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 It's already present on Fedora 22: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266391 -- Jan Pazdzi

Re: Local DNSSEC resolver and Docker(containers)

2015-01-15 Thread Jan Pazdziora
eded in other places (possibly patching docker with something like https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/9239) to minimize the impact. -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lis

Re: Local DNSSEC resolver and Docker(containers)

2015-01-15 Thread Jan Pazdziora
good approach, but requires updating both containers > and hosts with kdbus. We need Fedora 22 to continue supporting existing images. Can I assume that the note about Docker in that change page makes it an effective blocker or is it necessary to raise the issue some more? -- Jan Pazdziora Pri

Re: F14 AMI passwords

2010-11-19 Thread Jan Pazdziora
infrastructure (I know it's not 3-DES anymore, but still)? The passwords seem to be reset in /etc/rc.local by an random string. I was surprised to see the passwords change upon every reboot but it the found the cause and thought that maybe the AMI authors had good reason to set it up this

Re: Broken 32-bit F14 EC2 images?

2010-11-16 Thread Jan Pazdziora
376.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/2010-November/000398.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651861 ? -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list cloud@li

Re: euca2ools

2010-11-11 Thread Jan Pazdziora
;0's are replaced with account-specific numbers and things. > > At the moment you need all six of these variables, though the *_KEY > variables may not be necessary in future releases. Ahh. I don't have the EC2_(ACCESS|SECRET)_KEY's, I just use the cer

euca2ools

2010-11-10 Thread Jan Pazdziora
EC2_SECRET_KEY, EC2_CERT, EC2_PRIVATE_KEY, S3_URL, EUCALYPTUS_CERT by default. Is there anything else I need to have setup beyond EC2_CERT and EC2_PRIVATE_KEY? -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat __

Re: Converting the default instance store Fedora 14 to EBS

2010-11-03 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Marek Goldmann wrote: > > Attach EBS volume, say on /dev/sdf and it'll be available in instance under > /dev/xvdf. > Great, thanks. -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Eng

Converting the default instance store Fedora 14 to EBS

2010-11-03 Thread Jan Pazdziora
to life. Any suggestion about the device attaching (or about the conversion to EBS in general)? -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

Re: Fedora 14 AMIs

2010-11-03 Thread Jan Pazdziora
; Awesome! That does the trick. Thanks, Justin. Confirming. Thanks. -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

Re: Fedora 14 AMIs

2010-11-03 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:10:48AM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:30:43AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > > Looking forward to giving the AMIs a spin :) > > > > I checked the Fedora Project website (which is lacking a giant s

Re: Fedora 14 AMIs

2010-11-03 Thread Jan Pazdziora
52b instance-store paravirtual -- Jan Pazdziora Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud