Hi -- these beta AMIs need to be done today. 64 bit base AMIs have been
successfully uploaded, but I *still* haven't nailed the problem with the 32 bit
registration method. Or rather, I've isolated the problem, but haven't found a
solution. Searching the net has not been going well with this par
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:43 PM, David Gay wrote:
> Hi -- these beta AMIs need to be done today. 64 bit base AMIs have been
> successfully uploaded, but I *still* haven't nailed the problem with the 32
> bit registration method. Or rather, I've isolated the problem, but haven't
> found a solutio
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote:
> Based on a couple of conversations I found about the Xen hypervisor
> and this error message, I believe the issue may be PAE. Have to do
> some testing to confirm that. have past versions used a PAE kernel?
Yes they have. Are we not g
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:18:11PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Based on a couple of conversations I found about the Xen hypervisor
> > and this error message, I believe the issue may be PAE. Have to do
> > some testing to confirm that. have past versions used a PAE kernel?
> Yes they have. A
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:22:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Nice — we are not. So if this is the problem, I recommend we drop i386
> from EC2 for the beta, and add this to the list of things we need test
> candidates for early-ish for final.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
>
> Fedora Project Le
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:18:11PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> > Based on a couple of conversations I found about the Xen hypervisor
>> > and this error message, I believe the issue may be PAE. Have to do
>> > some testing to confirm tha
Andy:
> > 2. You cannot have an instance that is both 32 bit architecture and
> > EBS-optimized.
>
> "EBS-optimized" is just a storage performance thing, and has nothing
> to do with whether the image boots.
Yeah, that's fine. What I was saying is simply that there are no instance types
in
On 11/03/2014 04:43 PM, David Gay wrote:
> I'm with you on that. I don't know many people who use 32 bit cloud
> images. 64 bit is available for every EC2 instance type, and like you
> said, other services support it. I'm likely not the best person to ask
> why we provide 32 bit images, though. It
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:32:29PM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> The more I think about it - why do we need 32bit AMIs in the first place?
> EC2, Openstack, and company all support 64bit OOTB. Is there an instance
> where you would pick a 32bit cloud instance *over* a 64bit on? I can't
> think of an
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Brockmeier"
> To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 2:47:00 PM
> Subject: Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and possible
> solutions
>
> On 11/03/2014 04:43 PM, David Gay
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote:
>
> yep, and this backs up the idea that it really is a 32-bit kernel
> issue, rather than something in your process.
>
> Based on a couple of conversations I found about the Xen hypervisor
> and this error message, I believe the issue m
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:53:21PM -0500, David Gay wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Joe Brockmeier"
> > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 2:47:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot pr
, 2014 2:47:00 PM
>> > Subject: Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and
>> > possiblesolutions
>> >
>> > On 11/03/2014 04:43 PM, David Gay wrote:
>> > > I'm with you on that. I don't know many people who use 32 bit cloud
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:41:19PM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote:
> Do we have _any_ analytics on usage? (launch stats from AWS, or
> unique IPs hitting Fedora mirrors inside AWS, or ...)
We might be able to get some mirrormanager stats. But overall... we're
pretty short here.
Anyway, thanks for look
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:25:28PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> I would love to get rid of the 32bit AMIs. That being said, is this a "knee
> jerk"
> reaction? Typically it's best to make changes like this with planning
> involved
> and sufficient notice of the change so the community can prepare
On 11/03/2014 11:51 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 07:25:28PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> I would love to get rid of the 32bit AMIs. That being said, is this a "knee
>> jerk"
>> reaction? Typically it's best to make changes like this with planning
>> involved
>> and sufficien
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:41:27AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Do we have any way of seeing how many people actually use the 32-bit AMI
> on AWS?
Unfortunately, not really.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.
17 matches
Mail list logo
