Hi everyone,
just a quick heads-up: I offered my help with maintaining Fedora-Dockerfiles
[1] to Scott who accepted it, so I'm jumping in. In the following months, I'd
like to keep number of opened pull requests and issues at minimum and also sort
out some more complex issues like:
- setting up
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:36:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> One of the things that I forgot to talk about with Scott was the
> relation of Fedora-Dockerfiles to Layered Image Build System proposal
> [3]. The proposal suggests that dist-git should be set up for
> Dockerfiles. Are there any pl
On 10/01/2015 09:50 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:36:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
One of the things that I forgot to talk about with Scott was the
relation of Fedora-Dockerfiles to Layered Image Build System proposal
[3]. The proposal suggests that dist-git should
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
> >My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dockerfiles plan should make Fedora
> >Dockerfiles obsolete.
> How would users who aren't necessarily involved in the Fedora build
> process experiment building images with a Fedora base? Right no
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
> > >My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dockerfiles plan should make Fedora
> > >Dockerfiles obsolete.
> > How would users who aren't necessarily involved in the Fedora build
> > process experiment buildi
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:01:51AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Heh, it seems that my career as Fedora-Dockerfiles comaintainer may
> be rather short :) I think having a web frontend with pull requests
> for the new dist-git is an awesome idea. I'm +0.9 for pagure. The
> advantage is that it wil
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
>> > >My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dockerfiles plan should make Fedora
>> > >Dockerfiles obsolete.
>> > How would users who aren't necessar
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:01:51AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Heh, it seems that my career as Fedora-Dockerfiles comaintainer may
> > be rather short :) I think having a web frontend with pull requests
> > for the new dist-git is an awesome idea. I'm +0.9 for p
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
> >> > >My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dockerfiles plan should make Fedora
> >> > >Dockerfiles obsolete.
>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> > - Original Message -
>> >> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
>> >> > >My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dock
On 10/06/2015 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:01:51AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Heh, it seems that my career as Fedora-Dockerfiles comaintainer may
be rather short :) I think having a web frontend with pull requests
for the new dist-git is an awesome idea. I'm +0
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:11:47AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > So, would all of _those_ examples go into a single entity (package,
> > repo, whatever)? What should the distribution method for _these_ be?
> I'm not sure :) In fact, I'm wondering whether it's really necessary
> to be shipping t
On 10/08/2015 07:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Well, let's say we want to ship a Fedora Server role as an Atomic App.
> Or, say, Kolab. Where would the nulecule files for that live?
So - we're currently keeping working examples here:
https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule/tree/master/examples
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 09:09:11AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> So - we're currently keeping working examples here:
> https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule/tree/master/examples
> I would love to see a central repo for any Nulecule / Atomic Apps.
I *think* that in our first pass, layered imag
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
> > >> > >My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dockerfiles plan should make
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:30:21AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - The problem with Github login is that people without Fedora
> accounts haven't signed the FPCA. It'd probably be technically
> possible to have such users sign FPCA in pagure, but pingou was
> concerned about code duplication and
16 matches
Mail list logo