Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:00:58PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > 2014-09-17 19:05 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier : > > > > As a release blocker for Alpha or final? > > > > Both, as alpha release requirements are much less restrictive but I'm > open on the alpha side. > > > I don't want to block the alpha if w

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Haïkel
2014-09-17 19:05 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier : > > As a release blocker for Alpha or final? > Both, as alpha release requirements are much less restrictive but I'm open on the alpha side. > I don't want to block the alpha if we don't have it ready (but I think > we do) but absolutely want this to be

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 09/17/2014 10:35 AM, Haïkel wrote: > I'm in favour of considering Atomic as a release blocker but Joe and > Colin may have arguments not to. As a release blocker for Alpha or final? I don't want to block the alpha if we don't have it ready (but I think we do) but absolutely want this to be a b

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Haïkel
On a functional POV, most test cases are the same. I'm in favour of considering Atomic as a release blocker but Joe and Colin may have arguments not to. H. ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Haïkel
Le 17 sept. 2014 17:25, "Jared K. Smith" a écrit : > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Haïkel wrote: >> >> From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing on AWS. > > > > I said that I'd be happy to do some testing on AWS images, but wasn't specifically talking about t

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Haïkel wrote: > From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing > on AWS. > I said that I'd be happy to do some testing on AWS images, but wasn't specifically talking about the RC1 images. I would be happy to test the RC1 images today,

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > Hello guys, > > I have been testing the base & atomic images on openstack, so far, so > good ! I'll do later libvirt. > From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing on > AWS. > > Few things: > * matrix has not

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Mike Ruckman
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > Hello guys, > > I have been testing the base & atomic images on openstack, so far, so > good ! I'll do later libvirt. > From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing on > AWS. > > Few things: > * matrix has not

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-17 Thread Haïkel
Hello guys, I have been testing the base & atomic images on openstack, so far, so good ! I'll do later libvirt. From last meeting, I understand that jsmith will be handling the testing on AWS. Few things: * matrix has not been duplicated for Atomic, since Base and Atomic are *very* different imag

Fedora 21 Alpha RC testing request

2014-09-16 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks! In case anyone didn't see it elsewhere, we put 21 Alpha RC1 out for testing today. It still has some kinks, but we really need to make sure we have a reasonably complete test run on it and catch any remaining blockers. If folks could help test particularly in their own areas of interest