Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

2016-07-20 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:55:52AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO > Bumping thread in hopes of starting a discussion. Thanks for the thread bump. The previous came right before Summit and so there's my excuse. I'm definitely in support of this

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

2016-07-20 Thread Josh Berkus
On 07/20/2016 11:02 AM, Devan Goodwin wrote: > A few comments regarding openshift-ansible. I think the master branch in the > repo can probably cover Fedora quite easily at least at this point in time, I > don't think there's a whole lot in there that would be an issue. > > We're also quite

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

2016-07-20 Thread Devan Goodwin
A few comments regarding openshift-ansible. I think the master branch in the repo can probably cover Fedora quite easily at least at this point in time, I don't think there's a whole lot in there that would be an issue. We're also quite well set up to deploy, manage, and upgrade containerized

Re: RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

2016-07-18 Thread Adam Miller
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > Hot off the heels of Fedora Cloud WG (well kind of ... little lag > time in there) I took an action item during the Cloud WG Weekly > Meeting to write up a proposal for the Fedora Council on what

RFC - Project FAO (Fedora + Atomic + OpenShift)

2016-06-21 Thread Adam Miller
Hello all, Hot off the heels of Fedora Cloud WG (well kind of ... little lag time in there) I took an action item during the Cloud WG Weekly Meeting to write up a proposal for the Fedora Council on what was being called "Project Foosion" during the Cloud FAD. In an attempt to both not get into