- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca
To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:50:52 AM
Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote:
Hey -- I actually solved this problem during
On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote:
Hey -- I actually solved this problem during the holidays. Lowered
the size to 3 GB as suggested. There just haven't been any new builds
that have gone through, and I haven't cut a new version just yet
anyway (due to the holidays). It's no problem for
- Original Message -
From: David Gay d...@redhat.com
To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 4:46:44 PM
Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca
To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud
On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote:
Hey -- I actually solved this problem during the holidays. Lowered
the size to 3 GB as suggested. There just haven't been any new builds
that have gone through, and I haven't cut a new version just yet
anyway (due to the holidays). It's no problem for
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with
moderate disk demands?
For some value of soon enough, yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm
checking with David Gay, who wrote the
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca
To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 3:02:20 PM
Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry
On 12/17/2014 10:32 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Anaconda requires at least a 3G disk to install so the disk image
backing the cloud image is 3G you need to be at least that
are you saying that this has been introduced in F21? I have just spun up
F20 on a 2G disk with no issues.
--
Dmitry
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote:
Yeah, this was my oversight. Seems the cloud base image is only 425
MB. I can produce new AMIs right now. Do you think a 1 GB or 500 MB
drive would be best, or something else?
A bit of a side-track: is there a documentation on workflow you use for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:03:12 -0700
Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca wrote:
On 12/17/2014 10:32 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Anaconda requires at least a 3G disk to install so the disk image
backing the cloud image is 3G you need to be at least
On 2014-12-17 13:09, David Gay wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with moderate
disk demands?
For some value of soon enough, yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm checking
with David Gay, who wrote the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:09:03 -0500 (EST)
David Gay d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with
moderate disk demands?
For some value
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:40:46PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
I just tried to spin up cloud instance of F21 on EC2 only to discover
it's requirements for 12G volume (???). Am I doing something wrong or
did F21 jumped from moderate 2-3G (F20) over to 12G overnight. I
assumed cloud image would
On 12/16/2014 03:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:40:46PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
I just tried to spin up cloud instance of F21 on EC2 only to discover
it's requirements for 12G volume (???). Am I doing something wrong or
did F21 jumped from moderate 2-3G (F20) over
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with moderate
disk demands?
For some value of soon enough, yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm checking
with David Gay, who wrote the uploader.
--
Matthew Miller
14 matches
Mail list logo