Re: EC2 cloud image size

2015-01-30 Thread David Gay
- Original Message - From: Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:50:52 AM Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote: Hey -- I actually solved this problem during

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2015-01-29 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote: Hey -- I actually solved this problem during the holidays. Lowered the size to 3 GB as suggested. There just haven't been any new builds that have gone through, and I haven't cut a new version just yet anyway (due to the holidays). It's no problem for

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2015-01-08 Thread David Gay
- Original Message - From: David Gay d...@redhat.com To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 4:46:44 PM Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size - Original Message - From: Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2015-01-05 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 01/02/2015 05:46 PM, David Gay wrote: Hey -- I actually solved this problem during the holidays. Lowered the size to 3 GB as suggested. There just haven't been any new builds that have gone through, and I haven't cut a new version just yet anyway (due to the holidays). It's no problem for

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2015-01-02 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote: Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with moderate disk demands? For some value of soon enough, yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm checking with David Gay, who wrote the

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2015-01-02 Thread David Gay
- Original Message - From: Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca To: Fedora Cloud SIG cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 3:02:20 PM Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-18 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 12/17/2014 10:32 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Anaconda requires at least a 3G disk to install so the disk image backing the cloud image is 3G you need to be at least that are you saying that this has been introduced in F21? I have just spun up F20 on a 2G disk with no issues. -- Dmitry

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-18 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote: Yeah, this was my oversight. Seems the cloud base image is only 425 MB. I can produce new AMIs right now. Do you think a 1 GB or 500 MB drive would be best, or something else? A bit of a side-track: is there a documentation on workflow you use for

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-18 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:03:12 -0700 Dmitry Makovey dmi...@athabascau.ca wrote: On 12/17/2014 10:32 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Anaconda requires at least a 3G disk to install so the disk image backing the cloud image is 3G you need to be at least

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-17 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On 2014-12-17 13:09, David Gay wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote: Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with moderate disk demands? For some value of soon enough, yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm checking with David Gay, who wrote the

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-17 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:09:03 -0500 (EST) David Gay d...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote: Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with moderate disk demands? For some value

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:40:46PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote: I just tried to spin up cloud instance of F21 on EC2 only to discover it's requirements for 12G volume (???). Am I doing something wrong or did F21 jumped from moderate 2-3G (F20) over to 12G overnight. I assumed cloud image would

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-16 Thread Dmitry Makovey
On 12/16/2014 03:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:40:46PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote: I just tried to spin up cloud instance of F21 on EC2 only to discover it's requirements for 12G volume (???). Am I doing something wrong or did F21 jumped from moderate 2-3G (F20) over

Re: EC2 cloud image size

2014-12-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote: Does it mean that soon enough we'll see an updated AMI with moderate disk demands? For some value of soon enough, yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm checking with David Gay, who wrote the uploader. -- Matthew Miller