Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-11-16 Thread Trishna Guha
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > The Plan of Record is to move away from that repository and to a > dist-git style collection of repositories as part of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service > (possibly synced with github)? > +1 dist-gi

Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-09-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:47:35AM +0530, Trishna Guha wrote: > We have a repository on Github named Fedora-Dockerfiles [0]. The Repository > contains Dockerfiles but those are not **atomic** specific. > So adding ability to use **atomic** command will make **other hosts** lose > the ability to use

Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-09-08 Thread Micah Abbott
On 09/08/2016 01:33 PM, Trishna Guha wrote: On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Josh Berkus mailto:jber...@redhat.com>> wrote: In what way are images created for atomic not runnable on regular Docker? Examples? Sure. [1] is the Dockerfile for running cockpit on atomic host. We can run the conta

Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-09-08 Thread Josh Berkus
On 09/08/2016 10:33 AM, Trishna Guha wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Josh Berkus > wrote: >> >> In what way are images created for atomic not runnable on regular >> Docker? Examples? >> > Sure. > > [1] is the Dockerfile for running cockpit on atomic host. We c

Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-09-08 Thread Trishna Guha
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > In what way are images created for atomic not runnable on regular > Docker? Examples? > Sure. [1] is the Dockerfile for running cockpit on atomic host. We can run the container with *atomic* command. [2] is the Dockerfile for redis container

Re: Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-09-08 Thread Josh Berkus
On 09/07/2016 11:17 PM, Trishna Guha wrote: > Hi, > > We have a repository on Github named Fedora-Dockerfiles [0]. The > Repository contains Dockerfiles but those are not **atomic** specific. > So adding ability to use **atomic** command will make **other hosts** > lose the ability to use the Dock

Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles

2016-09-07 Thread Trishna Guha
Hi, We have a repository on Github named Fedora-Dockerfiles [0]. The Repository contains Dockerfiles but those are not **atomic** specific. So adding ability to use **atomic** command will make **other hosts** lose the ability to use the Dockerfiles. Since we are focusing on having production rea