On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> As I was going through some email this morning I saw that the Spins
> SIG is concerned that the Cloud SIG hasn't followed the Spins process
> to get their "ec2" labeled Spin included in the spins-kickstart
> collection in git:
>
> http://lis
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:20:52 -0500, "Jared K. Smith"
wrote:
> I've got to admit that I never saw the EC2 images as being a spin per
> se, but that's certainly a discussion we can have going forward. As I
> re-read through the Spins guidelines, it's still not clear to me how
> this would even qual
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:20:52AM -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > As I was going through some email this morning I saw that the Spins
> > SIG is concerned that the Cloud SIG hasn't followed the Spins process
> > to get their "ec2" labeled
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:20:52AM -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > As I was going through some email this morning I saw that the Spins
> > SIG is concerned that the Cloud SIG hasn't followed the Spins process
> > to get their "ec2" labeled
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> As I was going through some email this morning I saw that the Spins
> SIG is concerned that the Cloud SIG hasn't followed the Spins process
> to get their "ec2" labeled Spin included in the spins-kickstart
> collection in git:
I've talked t
As I was going through some email this morning I saw that the Spins
SIG is concerned that the Cloud SIG hasn't followed the Spins process
to get their "ec2" labeled Spin included in the spins-kickstart
collection in git:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/2011-March/001734.html
If the
