On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:15:35AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_talking_points
What we want to get to is a coherent story for Fedora 22 so marketing
can weave that into the beta and final announcements, plus Ambassadors
can use the talking points when
On 04/14/2015 09:14 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
the next best thing is a CentOS
Atomic that tracks RHEL Atomic.
The CentOS SIG is planning this.
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst
j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
[...]
So we've decided that while the technologies are maturing so rapidly,
it's better have a fast-moving remix or spin that gives users the
opportunity to use a Fedora-based
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:14:13PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
That seems like a missing step in the test / QA process - one which
I've been force to script in my own testing process for releasing on
F22. Weren't the F21 Docker images posted to Docker Hub for anyone to
test at some
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 03:26:36PM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
1. *Fedora* Atomic host and its release media / disk images / Vagrant boxes
Right.
2. Fedora 22 Docker image (which right now is a tarball and not
available on Docker Hub)
There *is* an official docker image on the hub,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
[...]
So we've decided that while the technologies are maturing so rapidly,
it's better have a fast-moving remix
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/14/2015 09:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 09:41 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:31:49AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Here's what I'd say, lemme know if this sounds sane:
On 04/07/2015 02:27 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:40:48AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
And I also added a question how do we want to talk about Atomic in
this release?
Features, benefits and advantages ;-)
Yes, those, please. :)
But, also, are we going
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:15:35AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_talking_points
[this reply to cloud sig only]
I added a bit about Vagrant. What else do we have?
And I also added a question how do we want to talk about Atomic in
this release?
--
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:40:48AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
And I also added a question how do we want to talk about Atomic in
this release?
Features, benefits and advantages ;-)
Yes, those, please. :)
But, also, are we going to talk about it in context of the planned
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Michael P. McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zn...@znmeb.net
Seriously, though, my sense after struggling with the existing Atomic
documentation is that it is a tool only for a very sophisticated class
of developer / operations
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:15:35AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_talking_points
[this reply to cloud sig only]
I added a bit about Vagrant. What else do we have?
And I
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:40:48AM -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
My own use case (planned - not sure it will be done by F22 release) is
deploying web apps as Fedora Docker images to Windows 8.1 (and Windows
10 when it ships) Hyper-V users. I've got the guts of it working but
it's not
Hey all,
Have put up the page for talking points for this release:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_talking_points
What we want to get to is a coherent story for Fedora 22 so marketing
can weave that into the beta and final announcements, plus Ambassadors
can use the talking points when
14 matches
Mail list logo
