On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:28:31AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Those ARM machines are probably not that common nowadays, but still I
> don't think we should exclude an arch right now.
If we have the resources to do ARM in addition to other, more
immediately relevant targets, then we should be w
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:58:43PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> I know ubuntu is working on supporting ARM in openstack, I really think
> >> we should as well. We should go big or go home. all of this change is
> >> about making Fedora bigger and better. This is a avenue we should
> >> pursue.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:28:31AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 05:58 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> I know ubuntu is working on supporting ARM in openstack, I really think
> >>> we should as well. We should go big or go home. all of this change is
> >>> about making Fedora bigger
On 11/06/2013 05:58 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> I know ubuntu is working on supporting ARM in openstack, I really think
>>> we should as well. We should go big or go home. all of this change is
>>> about making Fedora bigger and better. This is a avenue we should
>>> pursue. while ppc is a second
>> I know ubuntu is working on supporting ARM in openstack, I really think
>> we should as well. We should go big or go home. all of this change is
>> about making Fedora bigger and better. This is a avenue we should
>> pursue. while ppc is a secondary arch we need to also consider it.
>> there is
>> Agree - lots of situations where 32-bit is preferable, and in many
>> cases still the defacto arch.
>
> It's getting harder and harder to find 32 bit x86 hardware. There's exactly
> one use case for 32 bit in the cloud setting (IMO), which dgilmore and I
> briefly spoke about after the meeting
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:59:00AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> I know ubuntu is working on supporting ARM in openstack, I really think
> we should as well. We should go big or go home. all of this change is
> about making Fedora bigger and better. This is a avenue we should
> pursue. while ppc i
wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> From: "David Nalley"
> > >> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> > >> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:02:17 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: ZOMG WHAT ARE
Nalley"
> >> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:02:17 AM
> >> Subject: Re: ZOMG WHAT ARE WE BUILDING?!
> >>
> >> From the peanut gallery, feel free to treat accordingly.
> >>
> >> On Th
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:10:05AM -0400, Sam Kottler wrote:
> It's getting harder and harder to find 32 bit x86 hardware. There's
> exactly one use case for 32 bit in the cloud setting (IMO), which dgilmore
> and I briefly spoke about after the meeting yesterday - extremely memory
> constrained en
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "David Nalley"
>> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:02:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: ZOMG WHAT ARE WE BUILDING?!
>>
On 31 October 2013 08:10, Sam Kottler wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Nalley"
> > To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:02:17 AM
> > Subject: Re: ZOMG WHAT ARE WE BUILDING?!
> >
Hi,
On 10/31/2013 03:02 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> - Should we be targeting ARM?
>>
>> Now? Maybe. In the future? Probably should, yes.
>
> From a Cloud perspective, I don't know of a single public cloud using ARM.
> There are tons of benefits to using ARM, but I am not seeing
> deployments p
- Original Message -
> From: "David Nalley"
> To: "Fedora Cloud SIG"
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:02:17 AM
> Subject: Re: ZOMG WHAT ARE WE BUILDING?!
>
> From the peanut gallery, feel free to treat accordingly.
>
> On Thu, Oct 31,
From the peanut gallery, feel free to treat accordingly.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> (For those who weren't in today's IRC meeting, I sorta apologize for the
>> subject line. Sorta.)
>>
>> As we were
Le 30/10/2013 21:30, Joe Brockmeier a écrit :
Hi all,
(For those who weren't in today's IRC meeting, I sorta apologize for the
subject line. Sorta.)
As we were discussing today - we need to decide what we are building,
and (almost as importantly) what we're not building. We've agreed that
we wa
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (For those who weren't in today's IRC meeting, I sorta apologize for the
> subject line. Sorta.)
>
> As we were discussing today - we need to decide what we are building,
> and (almost as importantly) what we're not building. We'
Hi all,
(For those who weren't in today's IRC meeting, I sorta apologize for the
subject line. Sorta.)
As we were discussing today - we need to decide what we are building,
and (almost as importantly) what we're not building. We've agreed that
we want to be cooperating with the server SIG, but d
18 matches
Mail list logo