On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:04:40PM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> So I read that as "we are currently making images for ec2 AND currently
> making images for other cloud systems as well (presumably as part of the
> release engineering process" which is what I meant by "what are the
> other ima
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:04:40PM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>> So I read that as "we are currently making images for ec2 AND currently
>> making images for other cloud systems as well (presumably as part of the
>> release engineering pro
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:14:01PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> > (Eucalyptus can't digest qcow2.) And I'm afraid they will have to be
> > compressed because there's no reasonable way to make them a downloadable
> > yet useful size.
> VHD and VMDK might also be useful formats.
Yeah. As I understan
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:14:01PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> > > (Eucalyptus can't digest qcow2.) And I'm afraid they will have to be
> > > compressed because there's no reasonable way to make them a downloadable
> > > yet useful size.
> > VHD a
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:48:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Yeah. As I understand it, CloudStack uses different formats depending on
> > the hypervisor used, right?
> Is it best to produce one image and scripts for post-processing it into the
> appropriate formats, or to simply produce the
On 2012-12-17 10:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:14:01PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
(Eucalyptus can't digest qcow2.) And I'm afraid they will have to be
compressed because there's no reasonable way to make them a downloadable
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:57:47PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> >Is it best to produce one image and scripts for post-processing it into the
> >appropriate formats, or to simply produce them all?
>
> Unless the various formats are fundamentally different, if we're
> looking for portability th