On 12/02/2013 01:54 PM, milanisko k wrote:
> Please note there might be other refresh-triggers besides the "weekly
> timeout" such as:
..
> - yum update would fetch more than 50MB
..
That's an interesting thought.
The image is currently about 300 megs, compared to that, 50 megs seems
to be much.
2013/11/28 H. Guémar :
>> 2) We provide 'support' for all supported Fedora releases (not only the
>> latest one) by doing regular image builds including all current updates.
>
>
> Yes, i agree that we should be able to refresh images at a regular basis.
> Ubuntu does it weekly and it's a good caden
2013/11/28 Vitaly Kuznetsov
> Matthew Miller writes:
>
> > One of the general questions that's coming up across the working groups
> is
> > product lifecycle. We should talk about what we would like to see for the
> > Fedora cloud.
> >
> > I often hear that a longer lifecycle would be beneficial
Matthew Miller writes:
> One of the general questions that's coming up across the working groups is
> product lifecycle. We should talk about what we would like to see for the
> Fedora cloud.
>
> I often hear that a longer lifecycle would be beneficial, and if Fedora as a
> whole goes for that I
One of the general questions that's coming up across the working groups is
product lifecycle. We should talk about what we would like to see for the
Fedora cloud.
I often hear that a longer lifecycle would be beneficial, and if Fedora as a
whole goes for that I think we would take advantage, but m
