Re: FW: Easy task for folks looking to get involved

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > See reply below. > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:20 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jessica Tomechak >> wrote: >> > See inline below for my reply to David's question about purging the docs >> > directory in t

Re: Creating an Apache cloudstack docs repo: please discuss

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote: > On 06/29/2012 05:52 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jessica Tomechak >> wrote: >> >>> We are proposing a repo separate from the code. It looks like the name >>> should be incubator-cloudstack-docs. Could an

Re: Runbook for a very small setup

> Looks great! Seems like an easy way for people to set up their first > cluster. > > Although I really do like this initiative, shouldn't we be cautious that we > are bringing up to much documentation? It is indeed a concern - too much documentation becomes un-maintained documentation. (such as t

Re: Runbook for a very small setup

Hi David, Thanks a lot. It really helps me out. I like your example-style. Sincerely, Hsiao-Ting Wang 2012/6/30 Outback Dingo : > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> >> >> On 06/29/2012 05:30 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've been working on a s

Re: Runbook for a very small setup

On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 06/29/2012 05:30 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been working on a set of prescriptive instructions for getting a >> very small instance of CloudStack up and running while I have been on >> planes. I think that

Re: Creating an Apache cloudstack docs repo: please discuss

I would go with approch of having the docs in the same repo under say /docs as David mentioned And for the size of the *.tar files I am sure that we can handle that from build scripts so we can have: 1- Soure only 2- Source & docs 3- Docs only IMHO having separate repos should not be the way to

Re: First review of RBD support for primary storage

On 06/30/2012 01:12 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 06/29/2012 07:39 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Hi, After a couple of months worth of work I'm happy to announce that the RBD support for primary storage in CloudStack seems to be rea

Re: Runbook for a very small setup

On 06/29/2012 05:30 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi folks, I've been working on a set of prescriptive instructions for getting a very small instance of CloudStack up and running while I have been on planes. I think that's in a decent shape at this point, and so I finally go around to committing tha

Re: Review Request: Fix for CS-15300 Limits on domain admin accounts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5573/#review8772 --- server/src/com/cloud/resourcelimit/ResourceLimitManagerImpl.java

Re: First review of RBD support for primary storage

On 06/29/2012 07:41 PM, David Chamard wrote: Wido, Very nice to see. Is there any plan to support xen/xcp hypervisors in the future? No, not yet. RBD is supported by Qemu, so in theory it could work with Xen/XCP when using Qemu for full virtualization. Also, the Qemu version needs RBD sup

Re: First review of RBD support for primary storage

On 06/29/2012 07:39 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Hi, After a couple of months worth of work I'm happy to announce that the RBD support for primary storage in CloudStack seems to be reaching a point where it's good enough to be reviewed.

Re: Creating an Apache cloudstack docs repo: please discuss

On 06/29/2012 05:52 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: We are proposing a repo separate from the code. It looks like the name should be incubator-cloudstack-docs. Could any mentors or other interested parties please comment on both the strategy and