RE: [DOCS] Doc translation with transifex client

2012-12-07 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Thank you Sebastian -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 4:13 AM To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DOCS] Doc translation with transifex client Hi, I just posted a ho

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-595) Recreate root volume scenarios doesn't work in vmware

2012-12-07 Thread Koushik Das (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527074#comment-13527074 ] Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-595: Hi Joe, My bad missed out adding the

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-599) DhcpEntryCommand fails on Router VM on CS4.0 and vSphere5 with Advanced Network Zone

2012-12-07 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ilya musayev closed CLOUDSTACK-599. --- https://reviews.apache.org/r/8420/#review14193 > DhcpEntryCommand fails on R

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-599) DhcpEntryCommand fails on Router VM on CS4.0 and vSphere5 with Advanced Network Zone

2012-12-07 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ilya musayev resolved CLOUDSTACK-599. - Resolution: Fixed https://reviews.apache.org/r/8420/#review14193 > D

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 08:54:17AM +0530, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Prasanna Santhanam > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:06:21AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:00:42AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 a

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:06:21AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:00:42AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: >> > > Sailaja >> > > >> > >

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-601) Marvin unicode decode errors when running mysql queries via dbClient

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-601: - Summary: Marvin unicode decode errors when running mysql queries via dbClient Key: CLOUDSTACK-601 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-601

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
Mice, Thanks for the feedback. See Alex's comments, he clarified several points. The packaging of the commands itself does not provide role-based access control. The API server contains the logic To do access control. Thanks, -Fang -Original Message- From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tc

Re: Review Request: API-refactoring Add user VM parameter annotation.

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8430/#review14216 --- Ship it! Applied in api_refactoring. Pl. close the review, thanks.

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
Alex, thanks for the clarification. User and admin commands separation is aimed for developers and document generation, for the current refactoring plan. There is some benefits to physically separate user and admin API servers in the future, is it something we may consider It? Because it ca

Re: qemu-img convert a qcow2 to a qcow2

2012-12-07 Thread Bryan Whitehead
Well there we go. 'the more you know...' On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > There already is backing qcow2 support. But when cloudstack moves the > template from secondary to primary storage to use as a backing file for all > of your VMs, it does a convert. That strips any

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Alex Huang
> What's done and plans: > I've separated out api cmds as per admin, user pkg so that developers would > know what security level the apis (Cmd classes) are in. Next, I separated > them based on entity group (like all vpc, vm etc. related apis go together). > This was done only for developers, so t

Review Request: API-refactoring Add user VM parameter annotation.

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8430/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- For all the

Re: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
Sorry folks, I got it wrong and I re-read my emails and Alex is right. Pl. see his reply. What's done and plans: I've separated out api cmds as per admin, user pkg so that developers would know what security level the apis (Cmd classes) are in. Next, I separated them based on entity group (like

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:06:21AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:00:42AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > > > Sailaja > > > > > > Log defect and mark it as blocker for 4.0.1 release if this is

Re: Question on Python 2.6 with maven

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 05:43:10AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 05:19:43AM +0530, Fang Wang wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For cloudstack 4.0 build, is there anyone there using python 2.6 > > instead of 2.7 ? > > IS there any new feature in 2.7 that is definitely needed

Re: Review Request: API_refactoring Add more parameter annotation

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8428/#review14207 --- Ship it! Applied in api_refactoring; pl. close/submit the review. c

Re: Review Request: Refactoring ListEventsCmd and EventResponse.

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8427/#review14206 --- Ship it! Applied on api_refactoring, pl. close the review. commit 3

Re: Review Request: API_refactoring Add more parameter annotation

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8428/ --- (Updated Dec. 8, 2012, 1:05 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.

Review Request: API_refactoring Add more parameter annotation

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8428/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Annotation f

Review Request: API_refactoring Add more parameter annotation

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8428/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Annotation f

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Alex Huang
Mice, Please take a look at my email reply to Dave. There's no implied ACL in this separation. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 4:36 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Arch Rewo

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Alex Huang
I think there's misunderstanding here. 1. Separation for user and admin commands is done for developers. Because current CloudStack mixes the options available only to admins with the options available to end users, we see problems with people accessing things that they shouldn't be able to ac

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Mice Xia
Fang, I vote for the second way, to keep it simple and clear, each API server has the same binary artifacts and contains all API implementations, access control is based on RBAC/ACL, and blacklist(white List) can be defined on a per API server basis. And perhaps we don’t need to explicitly pack

Re: qemu-img convert a qcow2 to a qcow2

2012-12-07 Thread Marcus Sorensen
There already is backing qcow2 support. But when cloudstack moves the template from secondary to primary storage to use as a backing file for all of your VMs, it does a convert. That strips any snapshots or compression that an uploader may have been counting on, and is overall slower than just copy

Review Request: Refactoring ListEventsCmd and EventResponse.

2012-12-07 Thread Min Chen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8427/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Refactoring

Re: Question on Python 2.6 with maven

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 05:19:43AM +0530, Fang Wang wrote: > Hi all, > > For cloudstack 4.0 build, is there anyone there using python 2.6 > instead of 2.7 ? > IS there any new feature in 2.7 that is definitely needed for maven > but missing in 2.6? I guess you meant marvin (not maven). Marvin im

Re: CentOS System VM?

2012-12-07 Thread Bryan Whitehead
having custom systemvm's seems ideal. A network offering can be paired with a systemVM (or something along those lines). Giving the community the ability to create their own Vyatta-like offerings is what will drive innovation. Would be fantastic to have a number of VPN/LB/IDS/etc offerings in the

Re: qemu-img convert a qcow2 to a qcow2

2012-12-07 Thread Bryan Whitehead
I'd prefer to see backing qcow2 support instead of any kind of copying. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Edison Su wrote: > If the source image has dependence on other images, then we should use > "qemu-img convert ", otherwise, "cp" is enough. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marcus S

Re: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > On 06-Dec-2012, at 5:15 PM, Mice Xia wrote: > >> rohit, >> >> i asked this question because requests from domain admins are usually from >> outside of datacenter for a public cloud. >> >> so artifact built from user package can be directly de

Question on Python 2.6 with maven

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
Hi all, For cloudstack 4.0 build, is there anyone there using python 2.6 instead of 2.7 ? IS there any new feature in 2.7 that is definitely needed for maven but missing in 2.6? Thanks, -Fang

RE: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Alex Huang
I already have all my mail setup to filter JIRA emails to another folder so I'm actually okay with JIRA "spamming". However, I can certainly see people who don't have server side filtering getting annoyed by emails spamming them on their devices for example. I think to resolve David's concern,

RE: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Fang Wang
Hi Mice, For now, we just separate the API into 2 roles: user and admin. The admin can be separated further into root admin, domain admin, etc. Further dynamic roles can be added. Once the framework is there, we can further separate the admin roles. Per your question, there can be 2 ways to h

Question on ListEventsCmd

2012-12-07 Thread Min Chen
Hi there, In refactoring ListEventsCmd api, I ran into the following code which is a mystery to me, hope that somebody can explain here: if ((entryTime != null) && (duration != null)) { if (entryTime <= duration) { throw new InvalidParameterValueException("

Re: Review Request: Identified and resolved issue for Router VM on vSphere 5.0 and CS 4.0 - where a router VM would come up however the Link Local IP would be unreachable

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8420/#review14193 --- Ship it! Looked OK to me. I went ahead and added this to master. Hav

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-595) Recreate root volume scenarios doesn't work in vmware

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526863#comment-13526863 ] Joe Brockmeier commented on CLOUDSTACK-595: --- Hi Koushik, Thanks for reporti

Re: Review Request: S3-backed Secondary Storage

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
> On Nov. 30, 2012, 7:15 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > John, thanks for patch. Much better now. Can you check, why the code that > > configure db in the testclient is commented? > > tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py > > For the actual functional review, Edison can help on storage and > >

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-507) fix api docs for listSSHKeyPairs

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier resolved CLOUDSTACK-507. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 Have removed the line that adds thi

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
Some of our reviews pile up already sitting there for days. So don't think it's a good idea to move them into another list. I already have rules for JIRA and don't get a chance to look at them regularly which is a *bad* thing. Very bad. JIRA is just silly when it allows you to just click and chang

RE: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
I see your point, sending emails with every change to issue certainly keeps every- one in the loop, but are folks interested in all the minor comments that go through issue life-cycle? In my opinion bug tracker should not turn into discussion forum. The comments if any with respect to issue

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > I agree with Joe, JIRA should keep the same level of verbosity. > As Alex suggests, a good idea is to move them to a new mailing list (for > commits, jira and review board updates etc.) and people who want to receive > those can join them. Can

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-600) When rebooting KVM local storage VM host, libvirt definitions deleted

2012-12-07 Thread Andrew Bayer (JIRA)
Andrew Bayer created CLOUDSTACK-600: --- Summary: When rebooting KVM local storage VM host, libvirt definitions deleted Key: CLOUDSTACK-600 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600 Pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
I agree with Joe, JIRA should keep the same level of verbosity. As Alex suggests, a good idea is to move them to a new mailing list (for commits, jira and review board updates etc.) and people who want to receive those can join them. Can David or any asf-infra member help us get a new mailing li

RE: [DOCS] Doc translation with transifex client

2012-12-07 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
So is this worth automating? If yes, how can I help? -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 2:43 PM To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DOCS] Doc translation with transifex

[DOCS] Doc translation with transifex client

2012-12-07 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Hi, I just posted a how-to on translating the documentation from the command line, very cool :) http://sebgoa.blogspot.fr/2012/12/using-transifex-client-to-translate.html Of course you can use the Web interface as well: http://sebgoa.blogspot.fr/2012/11/translating-apache-cloudstack-docs-with.

RE: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Alex Huang
I support sending them to another list or this list as long as it is appropriately tagged. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:rjsch...@suse.com] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 11:27 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust

Re: Review Request: Identified and resolved issue for Router VM on vSphere 5.0 and CS 4.0 - where a router VM would come up however the Link Local IP would be unreachable

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012, at 02:40 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > No formal bug report has been filed, I had few threads running on this > mailing list and eventually came up with this solution. > > Do you need me to open one for consistency reason? It would be great if > we can roll this in 4.0.1.. Yes,

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-507) fix api docs for listSSHKeyPairs

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526807#comment-13526807 ] Joe Brockmeier commented on CLOUDSTACK-507: --- I'm looking at this. This comes

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-507) fix api docs for listSSHKeyPairs

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-507: -- Assignee: Joe Brockmeier (was: Jessica Tomechak) > fix api docs for listSSHKey

Re: Review Request: Identified and resolved issue for Router VM on vSphere 5.0 and CS 4.0 - where a router VM would come up however the Link Local IP would be unreachable

2012-12-07 Thread ilya musayev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8420/ --- (Updated Dec. 7, 2012, 9:46 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes -

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-599) DhcpEntryCommand fails on Router VM on CS4.0 and vSphere5 with Advanced Network Zone

2012-12-07 Thread ilya musayev (JIRA)
ilya musayev created CLOUDSTACK-599: --- Summary: DhcpEntryCommand fails on Router VM on CS4.0 and vSphere5 with Advanced Network Zone Key: CLOUDSTACK-599 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-599

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-596) DeployVM command takes a lot of time to return job id

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526799#comment-13526799 ] Joe Brockmeier commented on CLOUDSTACK-596: --- I don't see a fix available for

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-596) DeployVM command takes a lot of time to return job id

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-596: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1) 4.1.0 > DeployVM command tak

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-568) Source template id is recorded incorrectly.

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-568: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1) 4.1.0 > Source template id i

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-465) French language file quotes are dropping javascript syntax errors

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier resolved CLOUDSTACK-465. --- Resolution: Fixed setting to resolved. > French language file q

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-580) Packages are named with 4.0 with 4.0.1 build

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier resolved CLOUDSTACK-580. --- Resolution: Fixed Sudha, David made changes to the debian/rules and changelog f

RE: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-07 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Thanks for pointing out I looked under wiki child pages and did not find it. Since it is already on clouddstack.org its fine there no need to add it to Wiki. I think feature link should be available in navigation tree. Animesh -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.

RE: Cloudstack - jclouds

2012-12-07 Thread Musayev, Ilya
We've created a wiki page here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloudmonkey+CLI -Original Message- From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 4:17 PM To: cloudstack-dev Subject: Re: Cloudstack - jclouds Do you have

Re: Cloudstack - jclouds

2012-12-07 Thread Charles Moulliard
Do you have an example using cloudmonkey ? On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Not sure about jclouds api, can you try doing the same using cloudmonkey? > If it does not work, probably it's a api bug. > > Regards. > > On 07-Dec-2012, at 7:20 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote: > > >

RE: Review Request: Identified and resolved issue for Router VM on vSphere 5.0 and CS 4.0 - where a router VM would come up however the Link Local IP would be unreachable

2012-12-07 Thread Musayev, Ilya
No formal bug report has been filed, I had few threads running on this mailing list and eventually came up with this solution. Do you need me to open one for consistency reason? It would be great if we can roll this in 4.0.1.. -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.

Re: Review Request: Identified and resolved issue for Router VM on vSphere 5.0 and CS 4.0 - where a router VM would come up however the Link Local IP would be unreachable

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Hi Ilya, Is there a bug reported for this? (If the patch is accepted, I'd like to pull it into 4.0.1.) Thanks, jzb On Fri, Dec 7, 2012, at 02:31 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi

Review Request: Identified and resolved issue for Router VM on vSphere 5.0 and CS 4.0 - where a router VM would come up however the Link Local IP would be unreachable

2012-12-07 Thread ilya musayev
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8420/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Identified and resolved issu

Re: Static Analysis Tools

2012-12-07 Thread John Kinsella
Yes. https://my.fortifyondemand.com/login.jsp ;) For those who want to become part of the ACS security team, contact the PPMC. We don't have a formal process to accept new members, but I do want to manage who has access in case of sensitive info in the future. Stratosec

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-395) Primary Storage and Secondary Storage sections missing sub-sections

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier resolved CLOUDSTACK-395. --- Resolution: Fixed I've added xrefs for the primary & secondary "about" sections i

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-598) Testing security reporting

2012-12-07 Thread John Kinsella (JIRA)
John Kinsella created CLOUDSTACK-598: Summary: Testing security reporting Key: CLOUDSTACK-598 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-598 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-395) Primary Storage and Secondary Storage sections missing sub-sections

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-395: -- Assignee: Joe Brockmeier (was: Jessica Tomechak) > Primary Storage and Seconda

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart loses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Trevor Francis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526711#comment-13526711 ] Trevor Francis commented on CLOUDSTACK-597: --- Agent Logs in Faulty hosts: 20

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart loses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Trevor Francis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526709#comment-13526709 ] Trevor Francis commented on CLOUDSTACK-597: --- management server syslog: Dec

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart loses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Trevor Francis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Trevor Francis updated CLOUDSTACK-597: -- Attachment: cloud.sql Attached DB dump > Management Server Restart

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart loses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Trevor Francis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526685#comment-13526685 ] Trevor Francis commented on CLOUDSTACK-597: --- Hosts show enabled before resta

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Robert Schweikert
On 12/06/2012 04:24 AM, Wolfram Schlich wrote: Hey, I propose to change the ASF JIRA config for the CLOUDSTACK project in a way that it doesn't send out mails to -dev on *every* change, especially for description edits, comment edits, comment additions etc. and only do it for important events, l

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart loses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Trevor Francis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526676#comment-13526676 ] Trevor Francis commented on CLOUDSTACK-597: --- 2012-12-07 19:10:28,294 INFO [

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I agree this helps in making communication from Jira more effective. > David, Joe do you have administrator privileges to adjust the > notification emails from Jira? I'm actually -1 on this. I see comments coming from Jira as bei

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:24 AM, Wolfram Schlich wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I propose to change the ASF JIRA config for the CLOUDSTACK project >> in a way that it doesn't send out mails to -dev on *every* change, >> especially for description edits, c

Re: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:24 AM, Wolfram Schlich wrote: > Hey, > > I propose to change the ASF JIRA config for the CLOUDSTACK project > in a way that it doesn't send out mails to -dev on *every* change, > especially for description edits, comment edits, comment additions > etc. and only do it for im

Re: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
> Fri, Dec 7, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > This is a very good initiative. > > Folks looks like we also do not have a page that list all the features > that CloudStack supports. I volunteer myself. Actually, we do: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/software/features.html

RE: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-07 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
This is a very good initiative. Folks looks like we also do not have a page that list all the features that CloudStack supports. I volunteer myself. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Robyn Bergeron [mailto:robyn.berge...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 1:02 AM To: clo

RE: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

2012-12-07 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
I agree this helps in making communication from Jira more effective. David, Joe do you have administrator privileges to adjust the notification emails from Jira? Animesh -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 12:53 AM T

Re: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 06-Dec-2012, at 5:15 PM, Mice Xia wrote: > rohit, > > i asked this question because requests from domain admins are usually from > outside of datacenter for a public cloud. > > so artifact built from user package can be directly deployed as a user api > server and serve user requests. but t

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-585) DHCP entry provisioning is broken in the KVM agent

2012-12-07 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526614#comment-13526614 ] Animesh Chaturvedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-585: --- Wolfram no I was not ab

Re: Cloudstack - jclouds

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
Not sure about jclouds api, can you try doing the same using cloudmonkey? If it does not work, probably it's a api bug. Regards. On 07-Dec-2012, at 7:20 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote: > Hi, > > I use jclouds Java api to create a new instance. Using the web interface > with DevCloud2 running in

Re: Arch Rework RFC: API refactoring updates

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 06-Dec-2012, at 9:59 PM, Koushik Das wrote: > Rohit, > > Can you explain the "admin" and "user" security level? I don't see that in > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+API+refactoring. Koushik, That was part of Alex's talk on "The future of CloudStack Archite

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart loses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-597: -- Summary: Management Server Restart loses hosts (was: Management Server Restart loo

Re: Review Request: Refactoring ListTagsCmd and ResourceTagResponse.

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8412/#review14168 --- Ship it! Pl. fix your editor so it won't add trailing spaces and you

Re: Review Request: cleanup devcloud creation process

2012-12-07 Thread James Martin
> On Dec. 7, 2012, 5:54 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi James, good to see your patch. Pl. add Prasanna (tsp) and myself as the > > reviewers. tsp, help me review the patch. > > May be in future you can split them, so you can get it reviewed fast and > > get more git commit karma. Not interest

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart looses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526577#comment-13526577 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-597: - Prasanna, et al: This seems pretty

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart looses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley
Prasanna, et al: This seems pretty serious issue, can you collect info on this and see what is going on? --David On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Trevor Francis (JIRA) wrote: > Trevor Francis created CLOUDSTACK-597: > - > > Summary: Managemen

Re: Review Request: cleanup devcloud creation process

2012-12-07 Thread James Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8399/ --- (Updated Dec. 7, 2012, 5:56 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santha

Re: Review Request: Bugfix CLOUDSTACK-591: Fixed bridge name parsing in security_group.py to support bridge names that include dashes

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8406/#review14164 --- Looks good, if ^BR is not found, it would skip replacing. tsp, anyone

Re: Review Request: cleanup devcloud creation process

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8399/#review14162 --- Hi James, good to see your patch. Pl. add Prasanna (tsp) and myself a

Review Request: Refactoring ListTagsCmd and ResourceTagResponse.

2012-12-07 Thread Min Chen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8412/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Refactoring

Re: Review Request: Add SecurityGroup db view into create_schema.sql

2012-12-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8409/#review14161 --- Ship it! Applied in api_refactoring; commit 2bbd023eb65b2ad70d41757

Re: [DISCUSS][DOCS] Conventions for docbook xml filenames to be ready for translation

2012-12-07 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits
+1 agreed. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2012, at 9:23 AM, sebastien wrote: > Hi, > > A few of us have been looking at translation of the documentation using > transifex. > To automate the pushing and pulling of source files and translations from our > source code to the transifex site, we

Re: [DISCUSS][DOCS] Conventions for docbook xml filenames to be ready for translation

2012-12-07 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, sebastien wrote: > Hi, > > A few of us have been looking at translation of the documentation using > transifex. > To automate the pushing and pulling of source files and translations from > our source code to the transifex site, we need to follow some basic > guide

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-597) Management Server Restart looses hosts

2012-12-07 Thread Trevor Francis (JIRA)
Trevor Francis created CLOUDSTACK-597: - Summary: Management Server Restart looses hosts Key: CLOUDSTACK-597 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-597 Project: CloudStack I

[DISCUSS][DOCS] Conventions for docbook xml filenames to be ready for translation

2012-12-07 Thread sebastien
Hi, A few of us have been looking at translation of the documentation using transifex. To automate the pushing and pulling of source files and translations from our source code to the transifex site, we need to follow some basic guidelines for filenames of docbook xml files that we create in /

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-591) Wrong vnet in iptables on KVM hypervisors after VM reboot

2012-12-07 Thread Bill Rich (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526054#comment-13526054 ] Bill Rich edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-591 at 12/7/12 5:23 PM: -

Review Request: Bugfix CLOUDSTACK-591: Fixed bridge name parsing in security_group.py to support bridge names that include dashes

2012-12-07 Thread Bill Rich
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8406/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- When checking for rebooted V

Review Request: Add SecurityGroup db view into create_schema.sql

2012-12-07 Thread Min Chen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8409/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Add Security

Review Request: Modified docbook xml basename to be compliant with transifex client

2012-12-07 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8408/ --- Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley and Joe Brockmeier. Description

  1   2   >