Marcus Sorensen created CLOUDSTACK-645:
--
Summary: add/remove network on VM
Key: CLOUDSTACK-645
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: N
Marcus Sorensen created CLOUDSTACK-644:
--
Summary: Resize volumes feature
Key: CLOUDSTACK-644
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-644
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New
Vlans in advanced/KVM should only be required for the guest networks. If I
create a bridge on physical eth0, name it 'br0', and a bridge on physical
eth1, naming it 'br1', and then set my management network to label 'br0',
my public network to 'br1', and my guest network to 'br1', it should use
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcus Sorensen closed CLOUDSTACK-361.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Closing per Edison's comments (sorry it took so long, didn't noti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier resolved CLOUDSTACK-622.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Considered *and* committed. Service with a smile.
This is in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier closed CLOUDSTACK-622.
-
committed.
> In the add primary storage dialog in the ui the RBD fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-359:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0.1
> PropagateResourceEventCommand failes in cluster configur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-325:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1)
(was: 4.1.0)
> AWS API -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-271:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1)
> updatePhysicalNetwork dies with an NPE when t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8399/#review14538
---
Ship it!
Applied all patches on master:
eddb3dfc92824f13507ffad2839
> On Dec. 15, 2012, 3:39 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Pfew, took me few hours to test and fix few issues.
> >
> > First of all I want to give you kudos for your work, Kudos!
> > That said, the patch fails on multiple cases. I'll commit that so we can
> > continue
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8399/#review14536
---
Pfew, took me few hours to test and fix few issues.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8613/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Marcus Sorensen.
Description
--
Hi Animsh
My email client is outlook 2011.
I have already ask my administrator for help, But I got answer below ~:P
" For the meantime, the work around for this as advice by the Exchange
Admins is to ask your recipients,
outside the company, to update their address book using the display name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532823#comment-13532823
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-643:
---
Following is the cmd se
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-643:
-
Summary: KVM snapshots deleted on UI/API do not physically delete
from secondary storage
Key: CLOUDSTACK-643
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTAC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532813#comment-13532813
]
Alex Huang commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
---
We should definitely bring this discuss
> On Dec. 14, 2012, 9:58 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > John, don't put all the patches on one review. Pl. close this one as
> > submitted and open a new review (possibly backed by a jira issue) for your
> > changes:
> > Makes the Marvin database configuration optional
> > Adds S3 template search
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 11:54 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
> On Dec. 14, 2012, 9:58 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > John, don't put all the patches on one review. Pl. close this one as
> > submitted and open a new review (possibly backed by a jira issue) for your
> > changes:
> > Makes the Marvin database configuration optional
> > Adds S3 template search
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 11:48 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
I agree, I certainly don't want to implement something only to have the
community do the same later(and in an incompatible manner). It behooves
consumers of the project to work with the project. I just wanted
clarification because I read this to mean essentially "hey guys, don't just
drop patches
On 12/13/12 2:00 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>in on Apache mail at least once per day next week. I will be hard
>offline much of the following week, though - assuming I can resist the
>call of the keyboard.
Good luck, and enjoy!
--
Æ
If it is XenServer, traffic labels are not necessary in Basic networking mode,
since there is only NIC/BONDing being used,
And which is XS management interface, CS will find it.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 3:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev
Have a great vacation/holidays!
-kd
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:00 PM
>>>To: CloudStack Developers
>>>Subject: [OFFLINE] December 22 - January 1
>>>
>>>The subject should probably be "offline-ish"... I'm goi
The subject should probably be "offline-ish"... I'm going to be on
vacation from $dayjob starting this coming Monday, but will be checking
in on Apache mail at least once per day next week. I will be hard
offline much of the following week, though - assuming I can resist the
call of the keyboard.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:08:00PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Getting a bit late into the discussion here, but i agree with Chip here.
>
> I'm already uncomfortable with the idea for a marketplace inside
> CloudStack, but providing just the features allow some external party
> (or parties) to
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:59:32AM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> My preference would be to have most of the discussions on the mailing
> list as Alex also mentioned which will allow us to get our community
> its due credit in comparisons like this.
Credit in comparisons like that or any other
> On Dec. 14, 2012, 2:22 a.m., Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> > To answer the question in the original review request -- user registration
> > is not required.
Followup: After checking with Citrix engineer, it turns out user registration
is still required in the Apache CloudStack. Sorry for the con
No VLAN tags in basic network,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:ahmad.emne...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 2:54 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SSVM Network Configuration Issue
>
> On 12/6/12 10:03 AM, "John Burwell"
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:16:58PM -0700, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> 3. If it's generic enough that it makes sense for upstream CloudStack (and
> believe me anything we can push back we want to), we post to the list to
> see if anyone else is working on it or interested in it.
>
> 4. We get feedback
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:12:43PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> This is a bit long, but needs to be shared. Please do take time the time
> to read it.
Thanks for raising this. In my experience, it's a rare project that
moves from a single-sponsor model to a full-blown community model that
doesn'
On 12/6/12 10:03 AM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>Marcus,
>
>My question, more specifically, is are VLANs required to implement
>traffic labels? Also, can traffic labels be configured in Basic
>networking mode or do I need to switch my configuration to Advanced?
Hey John,
Traffic labels don¹t requir
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:55 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email Conventions : Subject Line Prefixes
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:56:26PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:56:26PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > Thanks for clarifying Chip. I will also like to drop PROPOSAL. If there is
> > no
> > objection by tomorrow I will remove it from the table
Wiki edits are no biggie to change/revert, but generally "by tomorrow"
doesn't leave
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:21:53PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
> > I updated the wiki 'Mailing List' section with a table for commonly used
> > prefixes. This will need some collaboration and discussion to settle down.
> > Please re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532717#comment-13532717
]
Chiradeep Vittal commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
-
+1 on the CloudFormation co
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/#review14524
---
John, don't put all the patches on one review. Pl. close this one as
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:08 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Email Conventions : Subject Line Prefixes
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8606/#review14523
---
Ship it!
Applied in api_refactoring;
commit 8d6e53354c93a3a5b87e6a8
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8605/#review14522
---
Ship it!
Applied on api_refactoring;
commit a2a3ef63c272c642457e57d
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8603/#review14521
---
Ship it!
Applied in api_refactoring:
commit 7ea690c74d56cf0442a1b42
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 9:49 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
In my opinion we should lean as much as possible towards "collaborating on all
features".
The reason is two-fold firstly community is a place to learn and explore if
we do not share ideas we would never know what community has to offer and
secondly by bringing in real world scenarios we als
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532691#comment-13532691
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-640:
Yes sure, let's keep it on the list.
We are running a CloudStack environment with multiple XenServer hypervisors.
This morning, one of our XenServers filled /var and was not longer connected to
CloudStack. We corrected this problem and then needed to do an emergency
network restart because the HV lost its networking info (believe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532681#comment-13532681
]
Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
--
Thanks Bill! We will take you up
Thanks Bill! We will take you up on the offer -- perhaps to contribute an
example OpenShift blueprint (when we have a candidate impl).
Best,
Alex
On Dec 14, 2012 7:58 PM, "William DeCoste (JIRA)" wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug
I think this is a great discussion to have, but I think it would help if
there were specific examples you could share so that we all have a better
understanding. For example, I think I'm guilty of this in some respects,
but I'm not sure if this is what you're talking about. Let me post one of
my ex
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing this email with my PPMC member hat on, but not speaking
> *for* the PPMC.
>
> This is a bit long, but needs to be shared. Please do take time the time
> to read it.
>
> Recently, some of us have been struggling with h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8606/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add annotati
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8605/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add annotati
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:30:45PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a conversation about our project bylaws. This is
> something that an Apache project doesn't absolutely require, but I
> believe that some of the larger TLP's have found it to be valuable.
> 1.3. CloudSt
Hi all,
I'm writing this email with my PPMC member hat on, but not speaking
*for* the PPMC.
This is a bit long, but needs to be shared. Please do take time the time
to read it.
Recently, some of us have been struggling with how to help guide the
community toward better collaboration on this lis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8534/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 8:09 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:54 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Donal Lafferty
> wrote:
>> The library was developed in Citrix to simplify accessing the CS API from
>> C#. The intent is to release code under the ASLv2.0 license.
>>
>> The addition would follow community
Folks
I was reading this blog on OpenSource Community Analysis
http://www.qyjohn.net/?p=2427 and here is a quote from it
"When the CY12-Q2 report was published, some people questioned the inclusion
of the incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list. This particular mailing list
contains a lot of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532602#comment-13532602
]
William DeCoste commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
Hi all,
Just want to point o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8603/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
API refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532600#comment-13532600
]
Fang Wang commented on CLOUDSTACK-640:
--
I actually do not want to go that way. Bu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8601/#review14514
---
Ship it!
Applied on api_refactoring:
commit 27482045ceef4ee4e8165c2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532595#comment-13532595
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-640:
Not sure if we should go for it.
> On Dec. 13, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > The patch applies cleanly, but it does not build. I stopped at two errors.
> > There's a syntax error in en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml at line 21 -
> > there are two comment closures (-->) so you need to remove one.
> >
> > It al
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/#review14512
---
Thanks, work in progress. Holding onto the previous patch but committ
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8601/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add paramete
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-641:
--
Summary: API Refactoring: Generate better docs
Key: CLOUDSTACK-641
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-641
Project: CloudStack
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532560#comment-13532560
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-639:
Part 1 was mostly already done by Pra
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-639:
--
Summary: API Refactoring: Adapters for ACL
Key: CLOUDSTACK-639
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-639
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type:
Fang Wang created CLOUDSTACK-640:
Summary: API refactoring - Integrate hibernate validator
Key: CLOUDSTACK-640
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640
Project: CloudStack
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-637:
-
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Improvement)
> AutoScale
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-636:
---
Description: The aim is to refactor and clean up the spaghetti acl and (db)
validation co
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 7:09 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav
Jira for AutoScaling:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637
Thanks,
Vijay V.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41] Feature Stat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/#review14511
---
Breaks build, patch does not have Validator.java, can you share that
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-638:
--
Summary: API Refactoring: Run api-server as a hybrid (part
standalone, part dependent on ms) server
Key: CLOUDSTACK-638
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vijay Venkatachalam resolved CLOUDSTACK-637.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
> AutoScale
> -
>
>
Sounds good...thanks, Rohit!
By the way, I will be out of the office next week and not online, but once
I get back I plan to start digging into the code. :)
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Welcome Mike!
> Yes, go ahead fork the git repository on github and start hacking
Vijay Venkatachalam created CLOUDSTACK-637:
--
Summary: AutoScale
Key: CLOUDSTACK-637
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Improvem
We should make it a rule. As long as they didn't put in the commit id, we keep
going back to the reviewer.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:37 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: PLEAS
>
> So what does this mean for a user requesting a feature or enhancement in
> Jira?
>
> User $foo may want CloudStack to provision coffee via IPMI, but they
> may also not have the ability to write that feature, but want to ask
> for it. Do they also need to bring it to the list? It seems very
>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> On 12/12/12 6:30 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>2.1. Users
>>
>>The most important participants in the project are people who use our
>>software. Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing
>>feedback to developers in the form of b
The proposal talks about a "Apache Listing Repository" and discusses
choices of where to host it.
The proposal should remove "Apache" from that description.
I agree with the sentiment in this thread:
the ACS git repository is not the right place to have these listings.
On 12/14/12 6:08 AM, "Hugo
+1
>
> If the feature needs to be done in a set of smaller sub-tasks/features
> then, IMHO, I would suggest to abstract the main outline of the feature in
> a main Task and flesh out the details in sub-Tasks, the same goes for bugs
>
Welcome Mike!
Yes, go ahead fork the git repository on github and start hacking on your
personal branch tracking the javelin branch.
Regards.
On 14-Dec-2012, at 9:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Thanks for the info, David!
>
> I have joined #cloudstack-dev now, so that should help, as well.
>
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:48:19PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7571/
> Encode URI during vmware cluster discovery
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8013/
> removed some unused connection properties
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8037/
> Fix for CLOUDSTACK-284
>
> h
Hi
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Fang Wang wrote:
> For a feature with several people working on it, if we create couple of
> bugs to track it, shall we add
> A field to point to a "master" bug to track the discussions, documents,
> etc?
> The master bug can contain all the proposal, discus
On 12/12/12 6:30 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'd like to start a conversation about our project bylaws. This is
>something that an Apache project doesn't absolutely require, but I
>believe that some of the larger TLP's have found it to be valuable.
>More specifically, I would like t
On 14-Dec-2012, at 8:54 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Donal Lafferty
> wrote:
>> The library was developed in Citrix to simplify accessing the CS API from
>> C#. The intent is to release code under the ASLv2.0 license.
>>
>> The addition would follow community pr
For a feature with several people working on it, if we create couple of bugs
to track it, shall we add
A field to point to a "master" bug to track the discussions, documents, etc?
The master bug can contain all the proposal, discussions, etc. And the
individual features can be
Tracked in each
Howie
What mail client do you use? If you are on Exchange then your administrator
should be able to change the display name
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: howie...@trend.com.tw [mailto:howie...@trend.com.tw]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubat
Fang Wang created CLOUDSTACK-636:
Summary: API refactoring -- restructuring the access check and
validation
Key: CLOUDSTACK-636
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-636
Project: Clou
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:47 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> 2.4.2. The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair
>> is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President,
>> Apache CloudStack) and has primary responsibility to the board for the
>> management of the
Just to be clear, this feature is to simply track multiple IPs in the ui/db
correct?
There is no mechanism to prevent an existing tenant from creating up aliases on
their subnet. So currently users can manually setup all the IPs they want in
guest VMs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2012, at
>
> 2.4.2. The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair
> is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President,
> Apache CloudStack) and has primary responsibility to the board for the
> management of the projects within the scope of the CloudStack PMC. The
> chair
Sure. Thanks,
-Fang
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:16 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Api refactoring
Fang,
Please add a improvement issue in Jira and have it set for 4.1 release o
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Chip,
>
> You and I have permission on Jira now. I've put up my filter and added it to
> the 4.1 release page.
Awesome, thanks!
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Release
>
> We probably can do the same f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/#review14508
---
Was applied on master:
commit b70c1a5a84ee014d980c07555d341f16ed515cb
Hi All,
Current guest VM by default having one NIC and one IP address assigned.
If your wants extra IP for the guest VM, there no provision from the CS.
Using multiple IP address per NIC feature CS can associate IP address for the
NIC, user can take that IP and assign it to the VM.
Please fin
Thanks for the info, David!
I have joined #cloudstack-dev now, so that should help, as well.
Also, I can fork
https://github.com/apache/incubator-cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack.git and
work from it.
Sounds like any work I do should be performed on the javelin branch, true?
Thanks again!!
On
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the new feature proposals coming in for 4.1, I like to propose that we
> add a new workflow in Jira for new feature and improvement issue types.
>
> - At creation, it should be "Discuss".
> - Once input has been gathered on the mailing lis
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
