Re: [DISCUSS] PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints (#576)

After reading up a bit more on AWS CloudFormation [1] and OpenStack's work-alike Heat [2], they actually differ quite a bit from VMware vApps. I thought it might be worth talking about some of the differences. CloudFormation is a general purpose provisioning system for AWS services, but under the

RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account

My comments inline -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:53 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account See inline > -Original Message- > From: Sanjay Tripa

RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances

Hi Chiradeep, I have added HAproxy section to the FS. I will update the API's/Commands for haproxy once Am done with NetScaler. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:51 PM To: CloudStack

Re: [MERGE] network refactoring, phase 1

Having problems with the merge. ETA is Thursday evening PST. On 1/16/13 3:40 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >OK , will re-do the merge and re-test and commit by EOD > >On 1/16/13 1:56 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" >wrote: > >>Chiradeep >> >>Are you waiting on revert for 312? Murali reverted it today

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning support from Citrix

+1 (binding) On 1/15/13 5:06 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a >donation from Citrix for Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning > >The initial discussion is at [1]. > >The content has been posted by Frank at [2]. > >The files woul

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

I hope we consider the case when the ip is removed from the nic while there is a PF rule to that ip. On 1/16/13 9:10 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >Hi Chiradeep, > >Now the VM NIC will have multiple IPs so for creating PF for secondary ip >address we will pass VM id and (optional argument) V

Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances

The new FS does not make mention of HAProxy? On 1/16/13 8:57 PM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: >Hi Chiradeep, > >Here is the FS link for AWS Style health checks >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Style+Health+Ch >ecks >I have added NetScaler Nito API classes to the FS. >API'

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning support from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: woensdag 16 januari 2013 15:40 To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning support from Citrix On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Animesh

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-653) High Availability: implement GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing) capability for ELB service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555929#comment-13555929 ] Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-653: - requirements and design has beed di

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-653) High Availability: implement GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing) capability for ELB service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-653: Description: Introduce the ability in CloudStack to orchestrate setting up 'global serv

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-965) When a detailview action is prohibited, the operation dialog box should not show up in the mean time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555926#comment-13555926 ] Pranav Saxena commented on CLOUDSTACK-965: -- Isaac , Thanks for the screensh

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-997) Improve documentation of assignVirtualMachine API

Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-997: --- Summary: Improve documentation of assignVirtualMachine API Key: CLOUDSTACK-997 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-997 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-295) Add instructions to modify limits.conf in installation directions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555914#comment-13555914 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-295: - description from 296: If the syste

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555911#comment-13555911 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: I can verify that in my setup

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:53:22PM -0500, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Reposting with subject line VOTE > > Committers have binding votes for this decision. > > Please respond with your vote: > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this enhancement > to CloudStack > in via th

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-722) Using a certificate chain for the Console Proxy is not documented

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555906#comment-13555906 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-722: - https://reviews.apache.org/r/8991/

Review Request: Documentation on Changing the Console Proxy SSL Certificate and Domain

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8991/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers and Jessica Tomechak. Description -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-722) Using a certificate chain for the Console Proxy is not documented

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Radhika Nair updated CLOUDSTACK-722: Attachment: update-ssl.png documenting the UI option > Using a certifi

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555887#comment-13555887 ] Abhinav Roy commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: Hi Sheng, I tested this feature in m

RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-737] support security group enabled network in advanced zone

Oops, Here is the patch, http://people.apache.org/~anthonyxu/ Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:59 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-73

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Tripathi updated CLOUDSTACK-713: --- Description: Limiting the resources on account/domain basis by adding new resourc

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-943) QA - S3 based secondary storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjeev N reassigned CLOUDSTACK-943: Assignee: Sanjeev N > QA - S3 based secondary storage > ---

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-846) [QA] Test support for multiple IP ranges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjeev N reassigned CLOUDSTACK-846: Assignee: Sanjeev N > [QA] Test support for multiple IP ranges > --

RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account

See inline > -Original Message- > From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:23 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > > Koushik, > > >What is the upgrade story? For e.g

Re: Asymmetric NIC prepare / release behaviour in NetworkManagerImpl

Hi Murali, Thanks for the link. I see in that mail: Create - IP address assigned to the NIC stays across start/stop sessions In the case where I am not seeing a corresponding release to a prepare call, the reservation strategy is 'Create'. However the trigger here is destroying the VM. Should I

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-845) [QA] Test non-contiguous VLAN range support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjeev N reassigned CLOUDSTACK-845: Assignee: Sanjeev N > [QA] Test non-contiguous VLAN range support > ---

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-996) MidoNet network plugin

Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-996: -- Summary: MidoNet network plugin Key: CLOUDSTACK-996 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-996 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-996) MidoNet network plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Cahill updated CLOUDSTACK-996: --- Description: More information about MidoNet itself here: http://www.midokura.com/midonet/

Re: [ASF401]Blocker for 401 discussed earlier

Hmm, ok. It (vpc deployment) worked for me just today, and we're running 4.0.1 on a few dozen servers with no issue like this, so be sure to collect the host config as well (his existing bridges and what traffic labels are set to, and anything else you can think of). On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:09

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-940) QA - Test reset VM on reboot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kiran Koneti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-940: --- Assignee: Kiran Koneti > QA - Test reset VM on reboot >

RE: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

Hi Chiradeep, Now the VM NIC will have multiple IPs so for creating PF for secondary ip address we will pass VM id and (optional argument) VM ip address to the API. When VM ip address is passed it checks the whether the ip belongs to the VM or not and configures the PF for the VM IP address. W

RE: [ASF401]Blocker for 401 discussed earlier

Yes - not specific to VPN. Basic VPC configuration itself is failing. I will have additional details updated on the ticket. -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:22 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re:

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kiran Koneti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-713: --- Assignee: Sanjay Tripathi (was: Kiran Koneti) Wrongly Assigned Dev Task on to my

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kiran Koneti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-713: --- Assignee: Kiran Koneti (was: Sanjay Tripathi) > Limit Resources to domain/ac

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-921) QA - nTier Apps 2.0 Support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] venkata swamybabu budumuru updated CLOUDSTACK-921: -- Assignee: (was: venkata swamybabu budumuru) > QA -

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-838) [QA] Test dedicated pod, cluster, and host functionality.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kiran Koneti reassigned CLOUDSTACK-838: --- Assignee: Kiran Koneti > [QA] Test dedicated pod, cluster, and host functiona

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-664) Health monitoring for NetScaler load balanced instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555861#comment-13555861 ] Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-664: --- Updated the FS with NetScaler N

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-701) Support non-contiguous VLAN ranges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555860#comment-13555860 ] Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-701: - link to the functional spec. https:

RE: [ASF41] Not able to add KVM host

Yes - this worked in 4.0 We have failures to configure VPC [1] but adding host is working fine [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938 -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:51 PM To: cloudstack-dev@i

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-664) Health monitoring for NetScaler load balanced instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555859#comment-13555859 ] Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-664: --- FS link https://cwiki.apache.o

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:20 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix +1 > -Original Message- > From

[PROPOSAL] Networking plugin to integrate the MidoNet SDN platform with CloudStack

Hi all, There were a few mentions on the list over the past few months [1] about creating a plugin to integrate the MidoNet [2] SDN platform with CloudStack. Since processes for new features have become better-defined since the initial discussion, I'd like to start ticking the boxes to make sure

RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances

Hi Chiradeep, Here is the FS link for AWS Style health checks https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Style+Health+Checks I have added NetScaler Nito API classes to the FS. API's starting with "Configure" as used to create devices like (configureF5LoadBalancer, configureNet

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-702) Multiple IP Ranges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555858#comment-13555858 ] Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-702: - link to the functional spec. https:

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555856#comment-13555856 ] Sangeetha Hariharan commented on CLOUDSTACK-995: Also wanted to add :

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:45 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in > CloudStack from Citrix > > +1 > > On 1

RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-299] Egress firewall rules for guest network

Hi Animesh, Please find the mark mail link below. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201211.mbox/%3c67ef18fdca335f489b366120481ab6c5f69d21e...@banpmailbox01.citrite.net%3E I am creating the patch, I will post the code once it is completed. Thanks, Jayapal > -O

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:45 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix +1 On 17/01/13 9:26 AM, "

Re: Review Request: Document procedure to choose default System Offering for System VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8698/ --- (Updated Jan. 17, 2013, 4:44 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-492) Document procedure to choose default System Offering for System VMs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555848#comment-13555848 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-492: - https://reviews.apache.org/r/8698/

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-615) Adding a VMware Cluster in a CS setup with CS-4.0.1 fails with "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class com.vmware.vim.ManagedObjectReference"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555839#comment-13555839 ] Sateesh Chodapuneedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-615: - Thanks Rohit. This

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-615) Adding a VMware Cluster in a CS setup with CS-4.0.1 fails with "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class com.vmware.vim.ManagedObjectReference

> -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] > Sent: 16 January 2013 23:28 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-615) Adding a VMware Cluster in > a CS setup with CS-4.0.1 fails with "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555834#comment-13555834 ] Hari Kannan commented on CLOUDSTACK-670: Hi Vijay The requirements for this f

RE: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

Hi Vijay The requirements for this feature suggest that we support a "configurable" way to choose between linked clones and full clones - make it part of the service offering; like local storage. Admin has to configure it, but user gets the option of choosing it (Community choice) i.e

Re: [ASF401]Blocker for 401 discussed earlier

Is it specific to the VPN config, looks like the user might not be getting that far? I don't really see the step by step that the user does so its hard to tell, but it looks like one of their router Ethernet devices fails to come up, is that when applying the VPN or before? On Jan 16, 2013 9:17 PM,

Re: [ASF401]Blocker for 401 discussed earlier

I'll see if I can duplicate it, except I don't have a VPN to connect it to yet. On Jan 16, 2013 8:18 PM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: > This is the issue that I brought up earlier this morning in IRC Meeting - > Discussion is rather long but core issue is that not able to configure VPC > https://iss

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 On 17/01/13 9:26 AM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: >+1 > >-Original Message- >From: Angeline Shen [mailto:angeline.s...@citrix.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:23 AM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in >Cl

RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-737] support security group enabled network in advanced zone

Anthony the patch you link that you specified is just a jira link. Please provide correct patch link. You can put in your people.apache.org space. Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:39 PM > To: clouds

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Angeline Shen [mailto:angeline.s...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:23 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix +1 angie -Original Message--

Re: [ASF41] Not able to add KVM host

Well there are certainly several errors there, hard to tell which might be the culprit. No cgroup fs, no cloudbr0, network restart failed because of dhclient... Can you verify that 4.0 build works with this same host config? On Jan 16, 2013 8:33 PM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: > Hi, > > Want to che

[ASF41] Not able to add KVM host

Hi, Want to check if any recent code check-ins has caused this issue [1]. Logs are attached to the defect. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995 Thanks /sudha

Re: Useful info about ASFBot...

The best thing about the bot is that I don't even have to watch JIRA and git. They show up as updates on the IRC channel. Just pick what piques one's curiosity. On 17 January 2013 02:55, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to share some useful info about ASFBot with the rest of > the d

[ASF401]Blocker for 401 discussed earlier

This is the issue that I brought up earlier this morning in IRC Meeting - Discussion is rather long but core issue is that not able to configure VPC https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938 Thanks /sudha

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-938: Priority: Blocker (was: Critical) > s2s VPN trouble > --- > >

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-938: Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 4.0.1 > s2s VPN trouble > -

[DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)

Hi, The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support now. Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick to dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one, to make thing as simple as possible i

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chandan Purushothama updated CLOUDSTACK-995: Attachment: management-server.zip > Not able to add the KVM host. >

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan updated CLOUDSTACK-995: --- Attachment: setup.log >From agent > Not able to add the

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555774#comment-13555774 ] Animesh Chaturvedi commented on CLOUDSTACK-670: --- Thanks Thanks Animesh

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-995: -- Summary: Not able to add the KVM host. Key: CLOUDSTACK-995 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-993) "admin" user is not getting created when management server is started.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-993: Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 > "admin" user is not getting created when management

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-993) "admin" user is not getting created when management server is started.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-993: Affects Version/s: 4.1.0 > "admin" user is not getting created when managem

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-993) "admin" user is not getting created when management server is started.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti closed CLOUDSTACK-993. --- Fixed and verified by rayees > "admin" user is not getting created w

Re: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

On 1/16/13 3:28 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >Yes, applying the affinity/anti-affinity rules can be done at the Planner >during allocation. So the rules will apply anytime (first deploy, >stop-start, migrate, HA) the planner gets invoked. We could introduce a >separate planner for processing affin

Re: Question on setting up a maven plugin project

Hi Kanzhe, For starters you can see bunch of plugins or any maven project, fork them and write your stuff; nicira, api discovery, acl plugins can be good starting point. Regards. On 16-Jan-2013, at 5:39 PM, Kanzhe Jiang wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a doc on how to set up a maven project in

RE: Functional Specification for Full clone support for CS VMWare deployments

Done.. Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:03 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Functional Specification for Full clone support for CS VMWare deployments Can you also

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati updated CLOUDSTACK-670: --- Description: https://cwiki.apache.org/con

Re: Functional Specification for Full clone support for CS VMWare deployments

Can you also update Jira ticket with this link? Thanks Animesh On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:39 PM, "Vijayendra Bhamidipati" wrote: > Please find the FS for the full clone support feature for vmware deployments > in cloudstack at: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Provide+fu

RE: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

Exactly, We can do both practices on top of each other as long as everyone either replies to dev list, or CC's dev list. Then a copy is available to all who are not in the direct CC. Basically an opt-in system above and beyond our current practice. Not in replacement of. -kd >-Original Me

RE: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

+1 -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:14 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC Hi all, I am struggling to read all the emails on dev list everyday, it's just so man

Re: unable to deploydb on javelin branch(developer/target/db/create-index-fk.sql not found)

Fixed in javelin, use deploydb now (it can throw some error logs, don't worry about it, fix for DatabaseCreator on the way) mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb On 16-Jan-2013, at 3:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Frank, > > You should use a different profile called cleandb; > > mvn -P de

error when creating a maven run configuration in eclipse

I got the error message "Base directory doesn't exist or can't be read" after setting the "Base directory" to "$project_loc:cloudstack". I was following the "use eclipse with cloudstack" guide. Thanks, -- Kanzhe Jiang MTS at

Question on setting up a maven plugin project

Hi all, Is there a doc on how to set up a maven project in cloudstack? Alex's tutorial session is not available yet on youtube. I tried to set up a maven plugin project, but couldn't find "org.apache.cloudstack" groupID. Thanks, -- Kanzhe Jiang MTS at BigSwitch

Functional Specification for Full clone support for CS VMWare deployments

Please find the FS for the full clone support feature for vmware deployments in cloudstack at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Provide+full+clone+support+for+guest+VMs+on+VMWare+deployments+in+Cloudstack Please note that the FS will be updated in the near future with more

Re: Review Request: [EC2 Query API] RevokeSecurityGroupIngress fails with 'EC2ResponseError'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8466/#review15437 --- Code looks good. How do we test the query API in master? Are there bo

Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) wrote: > My position is the same as Joe, judicious email filters. > > TBH I would like a copy of everything to go to the list. If certain people > want to CC above and beyond that, I think it's ok. We really need to keep > the archival working.

RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

So the VM will determine it's own participation level. A VM can have networks with SG and without at the same time. If that's the case this feature proposal just got more awesome! -kd >-Original Message- >From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-836) [DOC] Document the SNMP OIDs and operation of SNMP traps

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jessica Tomechak reassigned CLOUDSTACK-836: --- Assignee: Jessica Tomechak (was: Radhika Nair) > [DOC] Document the

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-993) "admin" user is not getting created when management server is started.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prachi Damle resolved CLOUDSTACK-993. - Resolution: Fixed > "admin" user is not getting created when management server is

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-993) "admin" user is not getting created when management server is started.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555723#comment-13555723 ] Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-993: - I have fixed this issue in master a

RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

Correct, there are several types of guest shared network, Zone-wide guest shared network Domain-wide guest shared network Account-specific guest share network One VM can be on multiple networks, SG is on VM level, means SG will be applied to all NICs of this VM. Cheers, Anthony > -Original

[jira] [Reopened] (CLOUDSTACK-926) ApiDiscoverService: Implement a plugin mechanism that exposes the list of APIs through a discovery service on the management server

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav reopened CLOUDSTACK-926: TODO: Write unit tests and resolve it > ApiDiscoverService: Implement a pl

RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

Got it, So we are still only talking about SG on advanced shared networks. Thanks. -kd >-Original Message- >From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:11 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isola

RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

In this spec, security group is only supported in shared guest network, we might add isolated guest network support later. I have a concern about this, normally there is firewall for isolated network, if security group is added to isolated network, that means if user wants to allow some kind ing

RE: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

My position is the same as Joe, judicious email filters. TBH I would like a copy of everything to go to the list. If certain people want to CC above and beyond that, I think it's ok. We really need to keep the archival working. Thanks -kd >-Original Message- >From: Sheng Yang [mailto:s

Re: [MERGE] resizeVolume

Merged. On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Better to use "git pull --rebase", which is cleaner than "git merge". > If you can squash your changes into small commits before push, that will > be even better:) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shado

Re: devcloud news

Great, thanks Marcus! On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Impressive ! Well done marcus. > > -Sebastien > > On 16 Jan 2013, at 21:48, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > Fantastic! Thanks Marcus! > > We can have a kvm devcloud based CI which can be much faster, stable to > evaluat

RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

So to catch myself up, this will allow functional security group isolation/ACLs on both 'shared' and 'isolated' networks? -kd >-Original Message- >From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:36 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apac

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-994) Feature Request: Support VmWare Storage Pool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555688#comment-13555688 ] Chris Sears commented on CLOUDSTACK-994: Could you provide a link to the VMwar

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-644) Resize volumes feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555683#comment-13555683 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-644: integration tests added to te

  1   2   3   >