Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-1072:
Summary: Cisco Nexus dvSwitch Documentation Is Not Present in the
Apache CloudStack Documentation
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1072
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTAC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564104#comment-13564104
]
Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-917:
-
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9122/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564103#comment-13564103
]
Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-399:
-
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9122/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9122/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sudha ponnaganti, Chip Childers, Jessica
Tomechak,
I didn't notice the API specification before in the FS.
The verb 'associate' is used with the public ip (for static nat), so it
will introduce confusion. I prefer "add" or "assign"
Similarly, 'unassociate' doesn't make any sense
Also, why insist on 'secondary' in the API? A nic cannot be created
w
On 1/27/13 9:52 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>i have the same question and i found this:
>
>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox//incubator-cloudstack-dev/201301.
>mbox/%3ccanlssbxhw5fhwrn3bs+yoj6ycpbbdu1khjzq4ncaa59fqfa...@mail.gmail.com
>%3E
>
>seems this annotation is used for converting entity
Hi Prasanna,
Thanks for your hint, I should have read the wiki carefully. 'mvn -Dnonoss
-DskipTests=true -Psystemvm clean install', this generates systemvm.iso
-Mice
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 2:17 P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564087#comment-13564087
]
Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1027:
--
Hi Pranav,
Sorry, I
Hi Pranav,
Sorry, I misunderstood the problem. I took a screenshot
related to this :
http://imgur.com/HMrTYQz. It only occurs in Chrome. FYI, thank you.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Pranav Saxena (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1027?pag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pranav Saxena updated CLOUDSTACK-1027:
--
Attachment: ssl_chrome.png
Isaac,
It works fine on my set up ( Attached the scre
Is this happening with the systemvm profile enabled when compiling?
I use mvn -Pdeveloper, systemvm clean install
- Original Message -
From: Mice Xia [mailto:weiran.x...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 11:39 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: systemvm.iso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564074#comment-13564074
]
Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1027:
--
Hi Pranav,
First
I ran into the same problem on the dev environment. Maven does not
package systemvm.iso at this moment.
For a workaround, I copied authorized_keys, cloud-scripts.tgz and
systemvm.zip to a directory and run mkisofs -o systemvm.iso
, then copy the systemvm.iso to the folder CS asks for.
-Mice
2013/
i have the same question and i found this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox//incubator-cloudstack-dev/201301.mbox/%3ccanlssbxhw5fhwrn3bs+yoj6ycpbbdu1khjzq4ncaa59fqfa...@mail.gmail.com%3E
seems this annotation is used for converting entity UUID->ID
-Mice
2013/1/28 Kelven Yang :
> I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pranav Saxena resolved CLOUDSTACK-1055.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> The overlay still exists whe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564066#comment-13564066
]
Pranav Saxena commented on CLOUDSTACK-1055:
---
Asf/master - Commit:
http://g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564064#comment-13564064
]
Pranav Saxena commented on CLOUDSTACK-1055:
---
Thanks Isaac for bringing this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564060#comment-13564060
]
Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-1071:
I had fixed the issue locall
Rajesh Battala created CLOUDSTACK-1071:
--
Summary: Netscaler element is not getting loaded as part of
LoadBalancing Service Providers.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1071
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
Javelin is going to be merged with master anytime now.
If that is going to happen anytime now (as the 72 hrs wait period is also
over), is it advisable to hold on to new commits and do those after merging the
code with the new frameworks that javelin will bring in ?
Also I will request the com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-749:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> nTier Apps 2.0 : Suppo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-869:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> nTier Apps 2.0 : Suppo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-299:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Egress firewall rules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-868:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> nTier Apps 2.0 : Suppo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-930:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Dev ticket is planned to fix i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sailaja Mada updated CLOUDSTACK-907:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Dev ticket is planned to fix i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-779:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.0)
4.1.0
> Specify egress rules o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jayapal Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-779:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Specify egress rules o
I have a question about a change in @Parameter at API layer, in regards to
entityType, does anyone know the reason behind why it has to go through
with some Response class which in turn declares links to the entity class
via @EntityReference annotation?
And in DeployVMCmd as an example, there is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13564006#comment-13564006
]
Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1055:
--
Hi Pranav:
This dial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cahill updated CLOUDSTACK-996:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Future)
4.2.0
> MidoNet network plugin
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563980#comment-13563980
]
Hari Kannan commented on CLOUDSTACK-684:
Thanks, Mice - I understand and agree
I put a wiki article about this at,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Spring+in+Clou
dStack
It explains some of the motivations for trying Spring in javelin together
with the architecture cleanup work, as Alex has pointed, it does not
change the business logic behind,
Citrix wishes to donate to code that enables Juniper SRX and F5 Big IP
to work in inline mode within CloudStack.
- Code is on people.a.o [1]
- Author (Kelven Yang) has signed an ICLA which has been acknowledged
by secretary@
- IP clearance form is up on the incubator website.
- Vote has passed on
Citrix wishes to donate code that permits users of CloudStack to reset
the SSH key of a VM in an automated fashion.
- The code in question is on review board [1]
- The author (Harikrishna Patnala) has submitted an ICLA to secretary@
which has been received.
- The IP clearance form is on the incuba
Citrix wishes to donate a feature around providing the option to
assign a public IP as an Elastic IP in Basic Zones in CloudStack.
- The patch is available on people.a.o [1]
- The author (Murali Reddy) has signed an ICLA which has been recorded
as received by secretary@
- The IP Clearance form has
Citrix has offered a donation of code to enable L4-L7 Network Services
in shared networks using VLAN isolation in CloudStack.
- Code is available on people.a.o [1]
- Author (Murali Reddy) has submitted a ICLA to secretary@, and it's
noted on the committer index as having been received.
- IP Cleara
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9118/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
merge VM Snapshot feature fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563855#comment-13563855
]
Mice Xia commented on CLOUDSTACK-684:
-
Hari,
recurring snapshots and limit per use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563848#comment-13563848
]
Mice Xia commented on CLOUDSTACK-684:
-
spec/doc:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluen
Thanks Donal for reporting that issue. That is one of my unit testcases, since
I am using mac, it is always working fine for me. Does anybody out there using
windows experience the same issue?
-min
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2013, at 7:20 AM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
> I have a couple of
I have a couple of these, and I think they have to do with using a Windows
environment.
For the one discussed below, I have no domain knowledge. It seems a better
idea to get in touch with a developer, which I did by looking at the github to
see who was committing changes.
The other failing u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563804#comment-13563804
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-129:
Is anyone implementing this one; Subm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-274:
--
Assignee: Min Chen
> Two error codes mapped to same value in API
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-272:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Delete failure message for network with a VM is not inf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-320:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> sessionKey query parameter should be case-insensitive,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563803#comment-13563803
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-969:
Is this still valid?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-249:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Add host id to failed VM deploy alerts
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1070:
---
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> javelin: NPE on executing registerIso API
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-534:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Failed to add host
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-520:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Dependency jar names mismatch with install-non-oss.sh
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1057:
---
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> regression of changeServiceForVirtualMachine API - f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-237:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> StopVMCommand reported success in spite of failing to s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav reassigned CLOUDSTACK-236:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Network Offering IDs are being exposed to the Regular U
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-792.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Noa Resare
Resolving as the patch was applied. mvn -P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13563799#comment-13563799
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-792:
Hey it's all cool, we had good discus
> On Jan. 27, 2013, 12:49 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Ship It!
Committed on master, closing review as submitted;
commit 7d40a7e500f5451e2c450e30fa520bc278ded088
Author: Noa Resare
Date: Sun Jan 27 04:48:47 2013 -0800
Make maven use mkisofs or genisoimage depending on what is available
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8838/#review15737
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rohit Yadav
On Jan. 4, 2013, 11:51 p.m., Noa
See inline. Refer to the code changes @ https://reviews.apache.org/r/9041/
> -Original Message-
> From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:56 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Raise clus
59 matches
Mail list logo