[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1174) Snapshots related SQL error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mice Xia resolved CLOUDSTACK-1174. -- Resolution: Fixed master d65bfc56cd9aaaed2567826214801d0944ed8b0e 4.1 9a9a4abf9d86d807e22f

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1174) Snapshots related SQL error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572254#comment-13572254 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1174: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1174) Snapshots related SQL error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572253#comment-13572253 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1174: -

RE: Issue observed when running the jetty server

filed a bug CLOUDSTACK-1174 for this -Mice -Original Message- From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 3:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue observed when running the jetty server WHERE AND snapshots.removed IS N

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1174) Snapshots related SQL error

Mice Xia created CLOUDSTACK-1174: Summary: Snapshots related SQL error Key: CLOUDSTACK-1174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1174 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Hi Alex, Thanks for the review, I have answered inline. Please comment. I guess the FS needs more description reasoning the 2-component design to avoid confusion. -Prachi -Original Message- From: Alex Huang Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:49 PM To: Prachi Damle; cloudstack-dev@incu

Re: Review Request: Documentation for the new features: Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone, Enable L4-L7 network services in the shared network in the advanced zone, and User-provid

> On Feb. 6, 2013, 3:21 a.m., Jessica Tomechak wrote: > > CLOUDSTACK-265, optional public IP for EIP with basic zone: passed IP > > clearance 1/30, but comparing the proposed code at > > http://people.apache.org/~muralireddy/ to the current code, I do not see it > > in 4.1 or master branches.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware

The feature that did not make it to master before 1/31 is now going to be part of 4.2. So move your feature ticket and related documents to 4.2. -abhi On 06/02/13 10:56 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote: >The changes are in review board. I will wait for some more time and if >there is no feedback will r

Re: Review Request: Documentation on Changing the Console Proxy SSL Certificate and Domain

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8991/ --- (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 6:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers a

RE: [ACS41]Only default Root admin is allowed to login Management Server

I am facing the same issue. Thank you, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:09 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: [ACS41]Only default Root admin is allowed to login Management Server > >

[ACS41]Only default Root admin is allowed to login Management Server

Hi, I have created user/admin accounts under root domain. I am not able login with these users. I tried with users under a new domain as well. === 2013-02-06 12:00:31,671 INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (11296479@qt

Re: Review Request: Support for Egress Firewall Rule

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/ --- (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 6:26 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, C

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> But a user can certainly build their own, right? Apache CloudStack is >> just source code, and while the System VM that's hosted by Citrix is >> being provided to the users as a co

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-645) add/remove network on VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572209#comment-13572209 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-645: KVM/Xen support merged into m

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1171) vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-1171. -- Resolution: Fixed > vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null" >

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1171) vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Min Chen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1171: Assignee: Min Chen (was: Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati) > vmware: "Uanble t

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1171) vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572207#comment-13572207 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1171: -

Re: [ACS41][QA]Issues observed with 4.1

Ok. Mine is CLOUDSTACK-1168. I've marked mine as a duplicate, it's got the link to the patch and an explanation of what's going on. On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > I have opened a ticket for NPE issue while creating firewall yesterday @ > CLOUDSTACK-1163- Fa

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1163) Failed with NPE while creating firewall rule

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1163: -- Assignee: Marcus Sorensen (was: Likitha Shetty) Assigning it to Marcus as

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1171) vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572202#comment-13572202 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1171: -

RE: [ACS41][QA]Issues observed with 4.1

Hi Marcus, I have opened a ticket for NPE issue while creating firewall yesterday @ CLOUDSTACK-1163- Failed with NPE while creating firewall rule Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 11:17 AM To: Kelv

RE: [DISCUSS]API request throttling

I've uploaded an initial draft of the test cases here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+Request+Throttling+Test+Cases Please let me know if any comments or if any new cases could be added. Some of the verification steps related to the UI cases may be a bit hazy. Feel fr

Re: [ACS41][QA]Issues observed with 4.1

I opened a case for #5. I also supplied a patch on reviewboard for it, which I'll apply if I don't get any feedback. It looks like createFirewallRule got split into createIngressFirewallRule and createEgressFirewallRule, and they now call a function that has returned null since before 4.0 #6 I've

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1165) VMware resource manager not found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572201#comment-13572201 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1165: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1113) Ipv6 - Not able to deploy a new VM in this network because of "Unable to allocate Unique Ipv6 address"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572200#comment-13572200 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1113: -

Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

Hi Prachi, When I said actual I was referring to the minimum memory available to a VM. Bharat. On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Bharat / Abhi, > > Even currently we always store actuals in the DB in op_host_capacity table. > During allocation, the overprovisioning ratios

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-667) VM's base image update facility

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572199#comment-13572199 ] Harikrishna Patnala commented on CLOUDSTACK-667: Submitted the patch f

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-820) Events framework to publish/subscribe to CloudStack events

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572197#comment-13572197 ] Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-820: - Merged into master with below comm

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-745) Reset a VM on reboot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572198#comment-13572198 ] Harikrishna Patnala commented on CLOUDSTACK-745: Submitted the patch f

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-265) Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-265: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > Optional Public IP assig

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-312) enable L4-L7 network services in the shared network in the advanced zone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-312: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > enable L4-L7 network ser

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-943) QA - S3 based secondary storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjeev N updated CLOUDSTACK-943: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 Affects Version/s: (w

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1173) ConsoleProxyResource instantiation exception

Marcus Sorensen created CLOUDSTACK-1173: --- Summary: ConsoleProxyResource instantiation exception Key: CLOUDSTACK-1173 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1173 Project: CloudStack

Re: [ACS41][QA]Issues observed with 4.1

Sure. I tested in my local setup, you can actually use -Xmx512m settings to run it. I'll look at the memory footprint issue together with the an improvement effort to speed up management server startup time. With Spring auto-component-scan turned on in a global scope, in a huge system like CloudSt

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-714) S3-based secondary Storage - eliminating a dependence on NFS as a buffer for object storage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nitin Mehta updated CLOUDSTACK-714: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > S3-based secondary Storage

RE: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware

The changes are in review board. I will wait for some more time and if there is no feedback will rebase and merge to master/4.1. > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:32 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Koushik Das > Subje

RE: [ACS41][QA]Issues observed with 4.1

Kelven, This needs to be a priority. Spring with just aop and di shouldn't be that huge. Something is wrong here. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 5:57 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subje

Re: Writing a new plugin with spring changes.

There is a draft writeup at here, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Spring+in+Clou dStack Kelven On 2/5/13 8:23 PM, "Manikanta Kattamuri" wrote: >Hi All, > >Is there any location where we can find instructions on creating a new >plugin after the spring di changes. I

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-647) Snapshot failing on XenServer 6.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-647. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in commit e162876605a31a4687ac77c5554e0a15ea7dda55

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-647) Snapshot failing on XenServer 6.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572184#comment-13572184 ] Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-647: -- The issue is that while backing u

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-644 add vmware resizeVolume support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9241/#review16165 --- Thanks, all problems resolved. It doesn't apply cleanly, however. Cou

RE: [ANNOUNCE] cloudstack-dev mailing list has stripped "Reply-to" header

The current behavior is not the one I've signed up for. Maybe I misunderstood what was being said myself. I agree with Brett. I thought the idea was people can cc people directly if they know who they want to get the attention of but the mailing list is still the reply-to address. You are st

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572183#comment-13572183 ] Sanjay Tripathi commented on CLOUDSTACK-713: Resolving conflicts that appe

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1172) Ldap enhancements

sadhu suresh created CLOUDSTACK-1172: Summary: Ldap enhancements Key: CLOUDSTACK-1172 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1172 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1136) [EC2 Query API] AssociateAdress, DisassociateAddress and ReleaseAddress fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572177#comment-13572177 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1136: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1134) [EC2 Query API] DescribeSnapshots, 'n' ListVolumes get fired on CS for displaying 'n' Snapshots taken from the same Volume

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572175#comment-13572175 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1134: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1135) [EC2 Query API] AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress and RevokeSecurityGroupIngress fails when icmp code and type is provided

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572176#comment-13572176 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1135: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1129) EC2 Volumes, add support for filter attachment.status

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572171#comment-13572171 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1129: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1133) [EC2 Query API] In StopInstances add support for force parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572173#comment-13572173 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1133: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1131) [EC2 Query API] RunInstances allows negative values for paramters 'MinCount' and 'MaxCount'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572172#comment-13572172 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1131: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1128) [EC2 Query API] DescribeAvailabilityZones, support for message filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572170#comment-13572170 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1128: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1127) [EC2 Query API] DescribeSecurityGroups, support for additional filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572164#comment-13572164 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1127: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1125) [EC2 Query API] Permission denied exception when a parameter value contains space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572159#comment-13572159 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1125: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1126) [EC2 Query API] RunInstances ignores the UserData input parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572160#comment-13572160 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1126: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-24) Multiples IP's on Private LAN with Nat 1:1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572158#comment-13572158 ] Abhinandan Prateek commented on CLOUDSTACK-24: -- Jayapal, Can you update

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-24) Multiples IP's on Private LAN with Nat 1:1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572157#comment-13572157 ] Abhinandan Prateek commented on CLOUDSTACK-24: -- Jayapal, Can you update

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1124) Improve the logging. Having empty response objects is harmless to functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572155#comment-13572155 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1124: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1122) [EC2 Query API] DescribeSnapshots fails, when an invalid 'snapshotId' parameter is provided

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572154#comment-13572154 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1122: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1121) [EC2 Query API] RunInstances, instance is always deployed in the default security group

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572152#comment-13572152 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1121: Patch submitted for review -

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-24) Multiples IP's on Private LAN with Nat 1:1

Jayapal, Can you update the status of this feature in jira. Also make sure commits made are mentioned in the ticket. -abhi On 08/01/13 9:24 AM, "Jayapal Reddy (JIRA)" wrote: > >[ >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-24?page=com.atlassian.jir >a.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:c

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1120) [EC2 Query API] Parameter:'keynames' is not honoured by DescribeKeyPairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572151#comment-13572151 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1120: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1119) [EC2 Query API] Add filter support for EC2DecsribeAddresses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572150#comment-13572150 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1119: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-608) [EC2 Query API] DescribeKeyPairs fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty closed CLOUDSTACK-608. - Resolution: Fixed branch: master commit: d738c81a4613f70783676a2d9657b9467c4e16a8

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1116) [EC2 Query API] Support for ModifyImageAttribute and ResetImageAttribute

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1116: -- Assignee: Likitha Shetty > [EC2 Query API] Support for ModifyImageAttr

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1117) [EC2 Query API] DescribeImageAttribute fails with 'Unsupported - only description supported' error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572146#comment-13572146 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1117: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1116) [EC2 Query API] Support for ModifyImageAttribute and ResetImageAttribute

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572145#comment-13572145 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-1116: Patch submitted for review -

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-695) [EC2 Query API] User registration should be removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty resolved CLOUDSTACK-695. --- Resolution: Fixed branch: master commit-id: 64b00d0b34c6705be38494b7bcfe432d96d58

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-695) [EC2 Query API] User registration should be removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Likitha Shetty reassigned CLOUDSTACK-695: - Assignee: Likitha Shetty (was: sebastien goasguen) > [EC2 Query API] Use

Writing a new plugin with spring changes.

Hi All, Is there any location where we can find instructions on creating a new plugin after the spring di changes. I tried finding it in the wiki but was not able to find it. --Mani

RE: EC2 Query APi

The patches corresponding to each of these sub tasks is already on review board. I have mentioned the same in CLOUDSTACK-197. For better tracking I will also update the sub-tasks with the corresponding review-request #. Thank you, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailt

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1171) vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null"

Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati created CLOUDSTACK-1171: --- Summary: vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null" Key: CLOUDSTACK-1171 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1171) vmware: "Uanble to find management port group null"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati updated CLOUDSTACK-1171: Attachment: vmops.log > vmware: "U

Re: [PROPOSAL] Raise cluster size limit to 16 on VMware

Koushik, If you have not yet updated the progress of this 4.1 feature in jira, please do. -abhi On 27/01/13 3:44 PM, "Koushik Das" wrote: >See inline. Refer to the code changes @ https://reviews.apache.org/r/9041/ > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Prashant Kumar Mishra [mailto:prash

[ACS4.1] Scaling up CPU and RAM for running Vms

Nitin, Can you update the jira ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-658 with the progress for this feature ? -abhi

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-745: Reset a VM on reboot

Hari, Do update the jira ticket with the progress and the details about the commit sent for review. -abhi On 05/02/13 2:01 PM, "Harikrishna Patnala" mailto:harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com>> wrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9157/

Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

Bharat, This is a 4.1 feature. Please update the progress and the git commit sent for review in jira. -abhi On 05/02/13 12:14 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: > >On 01/02/13 4:22 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >>I have made changes to the way capacity is calculated in Cloudstack , >

Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

Prachi, For Hypervisor not supporting overcommit, the cluster of those hypervisors cannot have a overcommit. It should not affect the current capacity calculation. Bharat will be able to elaborate on this. -abhi On 06/02/13 1:11 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >Hi Bharat / Abhi, > >Even currently w

Re: Review Request: Documentation for the new features: Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone, Enable L4-L7 network services in the shared network in the advanced zone, and User-provid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/#review16162 --- CLOUDSTACK-265, optional public IP for EIP with basic zone: passed IP

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1170) Redundant router: MAC addresses are different for additional public nics

Sheng Yang created CLOUDSTACK-1170: -- Summary: Redundant router: MAC addresses are different for additional public nics Key: CLOUDSTACK-1170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1170

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1107) Ipv6 - Unable to extend Ip range for a Ipv6 network using craeteVlanIpRange() command - Error code 530 returned.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572101#comment-13572101 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107: I don't know how this API suppose to

Re: Building SystemVM template appliance

I'm not sure it applies, I did not copy them, veewee generates the definitions for you which are like stubs and you modify the definitions as per your needs. MIT should be compatible with APL? Besides, we're not including veewee in our codebase, they are just config files for veewee. This is not s

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-677) Dual stack support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572099#comment-13572099 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-677: --- The code is in master/4.1 branch, but s

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1167) arptables rules are not destroyed after vm is stopped in XenServer in basic zone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572096#comment-13572096 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1167: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-748) nTier Apps 2.0 : Deployment of VM on a VPC Tier + 1 or more Shared Networks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572078#comment-13572078 ] Duncan Johnston-Watt edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-748 at 2/6/13 2:24 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-748) nTier Apps 2.0 : Deployment of VM on a VPC Tier + 1 or more Shared Networks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572091#comment-13572091 ] Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-748: -- Am interested in a use case simil

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-748) nTier Apps 2.0 : Deployment of VM on a VPC Tier + 1 or more Shared Networks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572078#comment-13572078 ] Duncan Johnston-Watt commented on CLOUDSTACK-748: - Looks like it is su

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-770) documentation on nTier Apps 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572074#comment-13572074 ] Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-770: - Then the QA bug should also

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-645) add/remove network on VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572071#comment-13572071 ] Mice Xia commented on CLOUDSTACK-645: - hi Marcus, are VMware/Xenserver supports me

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-770) documentation on nTier Apps 2.0

Then the QA bug should also be made a subtask, correct? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-921 Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:37 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubato

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-644 add vmware resizeVolume support

> On Feb. 5, 2013, 5:36 a.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Thanks for the update. Two things: > > > > 1) Did you decide what to do regarding the online resize? It sounded like > > maybe that didn't work out. If that's the case, you can disable online > > resize by adding to StorageManagerImpl.ja

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-644 add vmware resizeVolume support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9241/ --- (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 1:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, mice xia and Ma

Re: Review Request: Documentation on Changing the Console Proxy SSL Certificate and Domain

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8991/#review16158 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jessica Tomechak On Jan. 29, 2013, 4:51 a.m.,

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > But a user can certainly build their own, right? Apache CloudStack is > just source code, and while the System VM that's hosted by Citrix is > being provided to the users as a connivence, there has to be a path > for a user to do the build

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1153) Ipv6 - Vm deployment fails with "n must be positive" error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1153. Resolution: Fixed > Ipv6 - Vm deployment fails with "n must be positive" error. >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1153) Ipv6 - Vm deployment fails with "n must be positive" error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572044#comment-13572044 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1153: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1153) Ipv6 - Vm deployment fails with "n must be positive" error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572042#comment-13572042 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1153: -

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1153) Ipv6 - Vm deployment fails with "n must be positive" error.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572043#comment-13572043 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1153: -

Re: Review Request: patch-3 for feature 'Support for VMware dvSwitch in CloudStack'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9196/ --- (Updated Feb. 6, 2013, 1:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy an

Re: Review Request: patch-3 for feature 'Support for VMware dvSwitch in CloudStack'.

> On Feb. 5, 2013, 8:17 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/DatacenterMO.java, line 475 > > > > > > Not used Removed it. > On Feb. 5, 2013, 8:17 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > vm

RE: [ACS41] Can folks please take responsibility for updating their own Jira tickets?

> > I think in Jira the coupling is relatively loose, I was talking more > about sub-tasks as a concept. If I had a task to bring a birthday cake > to your party, and I had sub tasks of 'baking the cake', 'decorating > the cake', and 'delivering the cake', then the task wouldn't be > completed pro

  1   2   3   4   >