RE: [QUERY] Resolving JIRA ticket when sub task tickets are present

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:09 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [QUERY] Resolving JIRA ticket when sub task tickets are present > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:42:23AM +0530, Sat

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1575 Failed to transit volume with uploadVolume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9869/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and edison su. Description ---

RE: [DISCUSS] Review Board Guidelines DRAFT

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:56 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Review Board Guidelines DRAFT > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:07:13PM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: > > Nice

Re: rpm packaging job failing?

On 12 March 2013 11:11, prasanna wrote: > On 12 March 2013 08:28, David Nalley wrote: >> Prasanna - there appears to be nothing wrong with the RPM building >> when I do it on a freshly setup machine. >> >> No idea what's going on with jenkins, but there's nothing inherently >> wrong with RPM buil

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: dinsdag 12 maart 2013 7:18 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > +1 > > On 11/03/13 10:12 PM, "Chip Childers" wro

Re: Review Request: Adding awsapi in the require section of cloud.spec as it resolves issue with EC2 QUERY API Feature.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9776/ --- (Updated March 12, 2013, 6:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 11/03/13 10:12 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether >Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The >result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to >govern itself (which is a

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:25 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > +1 > > Thanks, > Sailaja.M > > -Original Message--

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community t

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-1456] SG Isolation in Advanced Zone for VMWare Hypervisor using PVLANs

As far as I can tell most of the requirements can NOT be satisfied by PVLAN. The only thing PVLAN can do is: 1. Restrict a VM's traffic to the upstream router 2. Restrict a VM's traffic to a set of Vms on the same physical VLAN. PVLAN does not offer any L4 access control, nor can it work across L3

Re: rpm packaging job failing?

On 12 March 2013 08:28, David Nalley wrote: > Prasanna - there appears to be nothing wrong with the RPM building > when I do it on a freshly setup machine. > > No idea what's going on with jenkins, but there's nothing inherently > wrong with RPM builds. > > --David > Rightho! Still looking to get

Re: Using newer DIY SystemVMs

> >This procedure already exists somewhere. System VM upgrades aren't new to >CS. >Let me see if I can dig it up. http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.1-i ncubating/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html

Re: Using newer DIY SystemVMs

On 3/8/13 9:20 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:55:19PM -0700, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> Just for confirmation, we are going to require a new system VM in 4.2 >>(or >> 5.0?), right? > >I believe that's the best thing to do, yes. > >> What about upgrading, is there a facil

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community t

RE: [ACS41][QA] Bug fixing sprint?

+1 Given that we have 35 critical and blockers it makes sense to aggressively close the defects by this week to meet the 3/22 RC date. I see all the 35 issues are assigned so if folks attend to their issues at priority we should get in better shape Animesh > -Original Message- > From:

RE: [MERGE] Multiple IPs per NIC UI

Hi Brain, I have the following suggestions on the UI mock pages in the bug. 1. Place Acquire IP in the nic-view-all.jpg page nic 1(default) heading right side end. 2. In nic-port-forwarding-select-ip.jpg place IP drop down column after the VM name. Also please change the column name to VM IP

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 Regards, Manan Shah On 3/11/13 9:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether >Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The >result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to >gov

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:28:41PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:22PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > >> Chip, et al: > >> > >> RPM Packaging is currently broken in 4.1 - this fixes CLOUDSTACK-1630 > >> - which d

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:22PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> Chip, et al: >> >> RPM Packaging is currently broken in 4.1 - this fixes CLOUDSTACK-1630 >> - which doesn't solve the breakage. But once packaging works again, >> this needs to

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 Way to go!!! -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to v

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1. Like it! 2013/3/12 Kishan Kavala > +1 > > On 11-Mar-2013, at 10:13 PM, "Chip Childers" > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > > result of this vote will demon

Re: rpm packaging job failing?

Prasanna - there appears to be nothing wrong with the RPM building when I do it on a freshly setup machine. No idea what's going on with jenkins, but there's nothing inherently wrong with RPM builds. --David On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Thanks Marcus, the jenkin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 11-Mar-2013, at 10:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern it

[ACS41][QA] Task Updates for 4.1 New features and Improvements

I am cleaning up the tasks to see which ones can be closed. Need sub tasks to be closed before main story is closed. Can Doc and QA folks review your JIRA sub tasks and close them so main story can be closed. Note that we need to clear out things as much as possible for 3/22 RC candidate drop.

Re: [WIKI] Releases section of the wiki was re-worked a bit...

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Nice visualization. Thanks. > There is one further release confusion -- as to which feature made it into > 4.1 and which ones are going into 4.2. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design > > I've been trying to

Re: [jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1267) KVM's cloudstack-agent service doesn't log (log4j)

I deploy from scratch several times a week. Thanks for looking into it. On Mar 11, 2013 6:49 PM, "Kelven Yang (JIRA)" wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] > > Kelven Yang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-

Re: [WIKI] Releases section of the wiki was re-worked a bit...

On 3/11/13 5:50 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >I spent some time today to consolidate information from several >different draft documents we had floating around, as well as from recent >discussions and decisions we made on the list. > >--- > >I've edited the top level "Releases" page to

Re: [MERGE] Multiple IPs per NIC UI

Not sure if the images attached to the bug are still accurate. If they are, it strikes me that the 'zone' column is extremely redundant. On 3/11/13 10:56 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:34:15AM -0700, Brian Federle wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to merge in the UI s

[WIKI] Releases section of the wiki was re-worked a bit...

Hi all, I spent some time today to consolidate information from several different draft documents we had floating around, as well as from recent discussions and decisions we made on the list. --- I've edited the top level "Releases" page to include, what I hope, our consensus around release plan

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:22PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > Chip, et al: > > RPM Packaging is currently broken in 4.1 - this fixes CLOUDSTACK-1630 > - which doesn't solve the breakage. But once packaging works again, > this needs to be applied to fix upgrades. > > 797eb009e239d904c52de8c5be4c

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 3/11/13 9:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether >Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The >result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to >govern itself (which is a r

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1631 - fix RPM packaging

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:24:27PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > Chip, et al: > > CLOUDSTACK-1631 is for the RPM build failures (that have been > occurring for some days now.) > > The error is: > error: create archive failed on file > /home/jenkins/build/workspace/package-rhel63-4.1/dist/rpmbuild/

Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack

- It might be better to support VPC instead of "isolated". Even if it means that some features are not supported initially. I feel that "isolated is a special case of "VPC", except for the firewall function. - What about support for systemvm / NS as an LB appliance? - Although the ASA DHCP serve

[ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1631 - fix RPM packaging

Chip, et al: CLOUDSTACK-1631 is for the RPM build failures (that have been occurring for some days now.) The error is: error: create archive failed on file /home/jenkins/build/workspace/package-rhel63-4.1/dist/rpmbuild/SOURCES/cloudstack-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT.tgz: cpio: Bad magic Bad Magic is _generall

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to

[ACS41][Patch Request]

Chip, et al: RPM Packaging is currently broken in 4.1 - this fixes CLOUDSTACK-1630 - which doesn't solve the breakage. But once packaging works again, this needs to be applied to fix upgrades. 797eb009e239d904c52de8c5be4cb0c82a63fea4 <-- applied on master

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1557

> On March 8, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > Changes are good. Are theer any changes for correcting the path to > > ec2-service.properties, as you have mentioned in > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1557 Pradeep, I suspect that the path to ec2-service.properties

RE: Feature request: SAS support

I think you can use SAS as local storage, which should be supported in CloudStack already. May need to manually setup a local storage on each hypervisor host before adding the host into CloudStack. Do you have extra feature requests if the existing SAS support is not enough for you? > -Orig

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itse

UPDATE: [ACS41][QA]QA Scrum Meeting

Hi All, Effective immediately I am rolling Tuesday Scrum meeting into IRC #Cloudstack-Meeting that happens on Wednesdays. Please do plan to attend that. Joe sends reminders for Cloudstack-Meeting each week. Thanks /Sudha CloudStack 4.1 QA Scrum Meeting : Agenda: * Review Current Status of

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 12/03/2013, at 3:42 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itself

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Chandan Purushothama wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incub

Feature request: SAS support

Hello all, I would like to request adding Server Attached SCSI support to Cloudstack. The use of direct-attached storage would be beneficial for the adoption of Cloudstack- SAS devices need less infrastructure to implement (no network devices needed, unlike iSCSI or FibreChannel), and therefor

Re: Naming Question

OK, cool - thanks! On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > Per my understanding, VO stands for Value Object, however, it is really > used as Entity Object (CRM term) in CloudStack > > Kelven > > On 3/11/13 2:00 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Probably a really easy qu

Question about Maven integration with Eclipse

Hi, I'm new to using Maven with Eclipse. I was curious how integrated it is. For example, I have created configurations to run our build and to run Jetty. Under the Project menu, I have Build Automatically checked. As you may be aware, this will attempt to recompile files that are changed when

Re: Naming Question

Per my understanding, VO stands for Value Object, however, it is really used as Entity Object (CRM term) in CloudStack Kelven On 3/11/13 2:00 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi, > >Probably a really easy question for someone out there: > >StoragePoolVO...What does the VO stand for? > >Thanks! > >-

Naming Question

Hi, Probably a really easy question for someone out there: StoragePoolVO...What does the VO stand for? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

I'm looking at the following for documentation, by the way, but please let me know if there are additional resources to review: https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/storage-subsystem-20.html What I could really use is sequence diagram that starts with a user kicking off a Compute or Disk Offering

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

Looking at this a bit more, I'm thinking DataObject represents the volume/LUN (for me) and EndPoint is the host? Let's use XenServer as an example. The user kicks off a Compute Offering that is based on a Primary Storage that uses my plug-in. The createAsync method is invoked and this is where I

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

As an example, in grantAccess, I'm passed in a DataObject. public interface DataObject { public long getId(); public String getUri(); public DataStore getDataStore(); public Long getSize(); public DataObjectType getType(); public DiskFormat getFormat(); public St

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > +1 > > > On 03/11/2013 06:37 PM, Edison Su wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -Original Message- >>> From: Chip Childers >>> [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.**com >>> ] >>> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM >>> To: >>> cloudstack-dev

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1621: listProjectInvitations fails with NPE for valid requests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9854/#review17696 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1: commit 1f1ba72cf492fe6c68a6b25184af2434ff2

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 03/11/2013 06:37 PM, Edison Su wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invi

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 11 March 2013 16:42, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itself (whic

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern its

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itse

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1621: listProjectInvitations fails with NPE for valid requests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9854/ --- (Updated March 11, 2013, 6:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Chip Child

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1621: listProjectInvitations fails with NPE for valid requests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9854/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- This patch

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

Hi Edison, Thanks for that info. There are two ways this storage system handles ACLs: CHAP credentials or IQNs. If a host has the proper CHAP credentials for the volume in question, we allow access to it. If the host is not using CHAP, then its IQN needs to be in an ACL on the SAN that we call

RE: [CI] marvin tests on jenkins

> -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Prasanna Santhanam > Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:49 AM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: Re: [CI] marvin tests on jenkins > > Update: > > The setup is now reliably functional with xen and kvm hos

Re: How do we handle updates to API documentation for existing

Ok, will do - thanks for the explanation. -- Dave On Mar 11, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:13:02PM -0400, David Grizzanti wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was wondering how we handled updating existing API documentation for >> CloudStack versions that are already

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On 2013-03-11 12:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to govern itself (which is a requi

Weekly News Draft is up for March 11

Hi all, The draft of the weekly news is up for March 11th. If you have any submissions or wish to peruse the issue to give it a second (or third, fourth, etc.) pair of eyeballs, now is the time. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Apache+CloudStack+Weekly+News+-+11+March+2013

Re: How do we handle updates to API documentation for existing

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:13:02PM -0400, David Grizzanti wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering how we handled updating existing API documentation for > CloudStack versions that are already out in the wild (i.e. 4.0.0)? > > There is an open bug for the createStoragePool API command documentatio

Re: How do we handle updates to API documentation for existing

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:13 PM, David Grizzanti wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering how we handled updating existing API documentation for > CloudStack versions that are already out in the wild (i.e. 4.0.0)? > > There is an open bug for the createStoragePool API command documentation, > howeve

How do we handle updates to API documentation for existing

Hi all, I was wondering how we handled updating existing API documentation for CloudStack versions that are already out in the wild (i.e. 4.0.0)? There is an open bug for the createStoragePool API command documentation, however, I believe it only applies to the 4.0.0 documentation as this poi

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:58 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator +1. On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati < vijayend

Re: Security Group Support

On 3/11/13 10:01 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, George Reese > wrote: >> From listZones -> >> >> >cloud-stack-version="3.0.5.20120904142539">1f9a1 >>d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2>tworktype>Advancedfalse>upsenabled>Enabled257b387d- >>3d9d-3585-8

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:48 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the In

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1. On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati < vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "Chip Childers" > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > > Apache CloudStack is ready to grad

Re: [MERGE] Multiple IPs per NIC UI

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:34:15AM -0700, Brian Federle wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to merge in the UI support for the multiple IPs per NIC feature > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1628 > > This adds UI support for functionality to A) acquire NIC IPs via the > instanc

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mar 11, 2013 11:38 AM, "Edison Su" wrote: > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator >

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 Questions

You can think grantaccess and revokeaccess API are the hookup interfaces to your storage plugin. Every time, when cloudstack mgt server wants to access the LUN, it will call grantaccess to get the information about the LUN, then send down the information to hypervisor host. The information retur

[MERGE] Multiple IPs per NIC UI

Hi all, I would like to merge in the UI support for the multiple IPs per NIC feature -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1628 This adds UI support for functionality to A) acquire NIC IPs via the instances NICs tab, and B) Use the secondary NICs for port forwarding, load balancin

RE: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1

Chip, Thanks, I just found your email. Jessica -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:21 AM To: Jessica Wang Cc: Ahmad Emneina; Sheng Yang; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com - kel...@backbonetechnology.com address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4 tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114   fax: +1 604 605 0964 skype: k

Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1

On Mar 11, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Chip, > >> Based on Ahmad's last email, we've agreed. Let's pull it from the UI now! > > I've submitted a patch to revert UI for IPv6 at Fri 3/8/2013 4:12 PM. > (The subject of my email is "[ACS41][Patch Request] - Reverting UI for IPv6 > in 4.

RE: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1

Chip, > Based on Ahmad's last email, we've agreed. Let's pull it from the UI now! I've submitted a patch to revert UI for IPv6 at Fri 3/8/2013 4:12 PM. (The subject of my email is "[ACS41][Patch Request] - Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1") Could you please review it? Jessica W -Original M

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 11 March 2013 22:12 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack commu

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:27 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether >> Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The >> result of this vote wi

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

Seems each hypervisor has its limit of supporting parallel storage motion operations. Should CloudStack understand the limits or facilitate a configurable limits over parallel operations? Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent:

Re: Security Group Support

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, George Reese wrote: > From listZones -> > > cloud-stack-version="3.0.5.20120904142539">1f9a1d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2AdvancedfalseEnabled257b387d-3d9d-3585-8c65-cc26d38a3a97VirtualRouterfalse > > And then I create a Security Group -> >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itself (

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itself (which

Re: Security Group Support

From listZones -> 1f9a1d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2AdvancedfalseEnabled257b387d-3d9d-3585-8c65-cc26d38a3a97VirtualRouterfalse And then I create a Security Group -> GET http://cloudplatform.cloudcentral.com.au/client/api/api?command=createSecurityGroup&name=dsnfw5821&desc

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether

RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator > > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to

[VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

Hi, I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to govern itself (which is a required step for graduation). This is a follow-up f

Re: Security Group Support

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, George Reese wrote: > I see environments with securitygroupsenabled = false but security groups > work. There must be more to it than that flag. > > -George > You see that using securitygroupsenabled = false with listZones and SG work? Alena: Thoughts? --David

Re: Security Group Support

I see environments with securitygroupsenabled = false but security groups work. There must be more to it than that flag. -George On Mar 11, 2013, at 11:08 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, George Reese > wrote: >> Is there a reliable way to determine across versions

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-94: API command, listIsos documentation clarity

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9853/#review17693 --- Ship it! Applied to master. Thanks for the patch! commit 85e9d63be

  1   2   >