I don¹t think this behavior changed ever.
The reason for the hard check should be as follows
Imagine the tag is for premium offering and the customer is paying premium
for that. Now he says deploy vm with this offering and say there is no
host with premium tag left to deploy the vm.
Now if we don'
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> See inline
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.ap
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> See inline
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Comp
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was a little surprised to see the Storage Type field when creating a
> Compute Offering recently.
>
> The options are Local or Shared.
>
> I guess I was thinking that if you had a preference for a VM running on
> local storage of t
See inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Compute Offering
>
> Hi,
>
> I was a little surprised to see th
> On March 14, 2013, 3:59 a.m., Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
> > The patch set is so big that it is hard to review. It would be nice to
> > separate it into management-server, plugin, agent plugin and UI.
Thanks for the review Kawai-san!
With regard to the patch size, we followed the example of the Bi
Make it more faster using -o so it won't download or check artifacts
dependencies.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> As a point of reference, on my i7 dual core HT enabled, it actually was
> better with -T 2. The time was just under 3 minutes. With -T 3, the time
> was just
Hi,
I was a little surprised to see the Storage Type field when creating a
Compute Offering recently.
The options are Local or Shared.
I guess I was thinking that if you had a preference for a VM running on
local storage of the hypervisor or using shared storage that you would
specify this using
Great - thanks for the info!
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> VMware Cluster is treated as externally managed cluster by CS. CS looks
> for Vcenter Cluster and Datacenter information while adding the cluster in
> CS. CS does a discovery using this information fo
Hi,
VMware Cluster is treated as externally managed cluster by CS. CS looks for
Vcenter Cluster and Datacenter information while adding the cluster in CS. CS
does a discovery using this information for all the hosts in VMCluster and all
these will be represented as CS nodes under VMware clus
Cool...that's what it sounded like from the docs.
What I was trying to picture, though, is how that looks in CS. By creating
a new CS Cluster for my VMware Cluster, will CS automatically create CS
Hosts to represent the VMware nodes?
I'm familiar with how XenServer works in CS, where you create
Hi,
It is recommended to create the cluster of hosts in vCenter and then add the
entire cluster to CloudStack.
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:34 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.o
Hi,
I've mainly been using XenServer with CS to date.
I was curious about trying out VMware and was reading some of the
documentation.
It looks like you set up your VMware Cluster in vCenter first, then go into
CS and create a Cluster for it.
Do you have to explicitly create CS Hosts for this C
As a point of reference, on my i7 dual core HT enabled, it actually was better
with -T 2. The time was just under 3 minutes. With -T 3, the time was just
over 3 minutes.
As I was going through this, I noticed there's a lot of inefficiencies in the
build. There was a lot of jar files being co
Yes, that's exactly what I did. ebtables -F on the instance's inbound
chain. It was the 'DefaultSharedNetworkOffering'. I assumed there were
at least ebtables rules to keep the VM from using IP addresses it
didn't own, but this was like I had security groups turned on, without
the ability to edit t
Thanks a lot Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:19 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: eclipse and maven working together...
>
> Oh and btw, I checked in a new profile called impatient. W
Oh and with the eclipse change, I was able to finally use multiple threads to
compile. Before, it always died because eclipse was interfering.Now I'm
able to get the entire compile down to just about 3 minutes.
mvn -T 3 -o -P impatient,systemvm clean install -DskipTests=true
--Alex
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9898/#review17849
---
The patch set is so big that it is hard to review. It would be nice t
I'd update the building with maven section on cwiki. but I dont know how to
describe the impatient profile, beyond 'it pleases alex'.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Oh and btw, I checked in a new profile called impatient. With it, I cut
> off a whole minute (about 25% for
Oh and btw, I checked in a new profile called impatient. With it, I cut off a
whole minute (about 25% for me) off the build. Use it in place of developer.
Developer profile is still there.
mvn -o -P impatient,systemvm clean install -DskipTests=true
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From
If ebtables -F restores vm service(s)... it sounds like a bug.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and
> I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The
> result was that all of the instance
Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and
I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The
result was that all of the instances deployed could not host services.
They could get out, but nothing could reach their IPs. I ran an
'ebtables -t nat -L' and saw
With the included checkins, I made some changes to help developers with better
productivity.
With maven not supporting incremental build, most people are building with mvn
clean install. After doing that, you probably see eclipse start rebuilding the
workspace and eclipse is slow when that hap
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/
---
(Updated March 14, 2013, 3:25 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
David
I looked up the review board for patches that need to go in 4.1 and here are
the action items for you and other folks on cc list
Review ID SummarySubmitter Status
Who to take Action Action Item
9878CLOUDSTACK-1544: dgrizzanti Patc
> On None, roxanne chang wrote:
> > Ship It!
Reviwer should mark the patch as "Ship it" not the submitter. Please refere to
Review Board guidelines
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Review+Board+Guidelines.
Also add Edison Su as reviewer
- Animesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9872/
---
(Updated March 14, 2013, 1:44 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley
> On March 13, 2013, 9:52 p.m., ASF Subversion and Git Services wrote:
> > Commit 81a5a1270ee4eafa0984f985011b59a1b56d3399 in branch refs/heads/4.1
> > from David Nalley
> > [
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;h=81a5a12
> > ]
> >
> > BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-15
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9917/#review17845
---
Prachi:
This doesn't cleanly apply to 4.1
[ke4qqq@mba incubator-c
Thanks Kishan for your input.
Since we will now rely on Events Framework feature to publish events that could
be used by admins to maintain data sync between regions , I have created test
plan for this feature-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Events+Framework+Test+plan
.
Wido
Looks like the build is broken (RAT failure) with the new file
usage/conf/db.properties.in added. Can you check on it
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: wid...@apache.org [mailto:wid...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-comm...@incubato
Patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9917/
Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1604: deploy VM failed when global setting
"vm.allocation.algorithm" is set to "userdispersing"
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9917/
---
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley and Chip Childers.
Description
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 5:27 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [OFFLINE] Thursday, Friday, Monday
>
> So I'm going to continue to have sporadic (even less than today) connectivit
Mice please see concerns from Anthony on Xenserver support., I guess they can
only be proved conclusively by testing with xenserver. Chandan will test with
xenserver.
But given that there is some doubt on full support for xenserver and kvm
dependency on libvirt-java binding and I assume the ef
Hey all,
I wanted to share status and next steps on our road to graduation.
Our Vote:
I'll be able to close the graduation VOTE on time tomorrow (72 hours).
Right now, I'm assuming that we pass the vote. We currently have 53
+1 votes (with 4 of them being IPMC members) and no +0 or -1's.
IPMC
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> So I'm going to continue to have sporadic (even less than today)
> connectivity over the next three work days... that means *some*
> emailing is possible, but it also means that I can't work on things
> like commiting patches or reviewing bu
So I'm going to continue to have sporadic (even less than today)
connectivity over the next three work days... that means *some*
emailing is possible, but it also means that I can't work on things
like commiting patches or reviewing bugs.
I need someone to continue to manage the 4.1 patch reviews
Either is OK. It's not common that bug would be triggered.
If community think it's OK for 4.1, I would post a patch request for 4.1.
--Sheng
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Does this need to come in to 4.1?
>
> --David
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:31 PM, wrote:
>> Upda
Tested the commit against 4.0 branch, 4.1 branch, and master dev
environments. Successfully deployed zones with local and NFS primary
storage, to the point of instances, then rebooted KVM host, and
everything came back up. Asked reporter to test patch, but reporter
found a workaround and moved on.
doc site i'm referring to:
https://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.0-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/index.html
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> i think it just needs some configuration tweak to make it work, then
> again, what do i kn
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9823/#review17828
---
Commit 81a5a1270ee4eafa0984f985011b59a1b56d3399 in branch refs/heads/
ACK
Applies and builds cleanly
Committed in 4.1
Thanks,
--David
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9823/
>
>
> Reviewed and checked in master.
>
> Commit hash:7bb8ed4d05ac9ea1242201e0e4fafc36916d5c51
>
>
>
> ---
Patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9823/
Reviewed and checked in master.
Commit hash:7bb8ed4d05ac9ea1242201e0e4fafc36916d5c51
Author:Pradeep Soundararajan
(pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com)
Author date: 11 minutes ago
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9823/#review17826
---
Commit 7bb8ed4d05ac9ea1242201e0e4fafc36916d5c51 in branch refs/heads/
You may also need to clear the host tag to let CloudStack push for new
systemvm ISOes.
You can either use XenCenter UI to do it or use xe command
xe host-param-clear param-name=tags uuid=
on Xen host
Kelven
On 3/13/13 10:45 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
>Thanks Kelven for the input but I had
Hugo
Can you review this issue?
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Pradeep Soundararajan (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 6:08 AM
> To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1252) Failed to download default
> templ
Ok, the fix for CLOUDSTACK-600 is the first patch mentioned plus two
fixes to it. The first additional patch handles upgrades, and the
second one is a minor fix for when we shut down a non-persistent VM
that will avoid printing useless scary messages (we throw an error in
the timeout loop that wait
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9908/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
add procedure VPCNetworkUsag
Is there a way to start cloud-usage service by maven,
or any other way except when it's packaged and by 'service start'?
Thank you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9772/#review17815
---
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/V
On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> PVLAN provides "subnet within subnet" L2 isolation, it operates very
> differently with current L3/L4 capable SG implementation, would it be a
> good idea to just separate it as L2 isolation feature on its own?
It works differently and is normall
Nitin,
Sorry to reply late, have been busy working on a patch release for
customer.
AsyncJob manager does provide a mechanism that you can do synchronized the
job execution against a object. You may check out
AsyncJobManager.syncAsyncJobExecution().
Kelven
On 3/12/13 11:27 AM, "Nitin Mehta" w
You're correct...I'll remove the zone column as it is unnecessary here.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:06 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; Jessica Wang; Pranav Saxena;
Thanks for your suggestions Jayapal. Here are my comments:
>> 1. Place Acquire IP in the nic-view-all.jpg page nic 1(default) heading
>> right side end.
The acquire IP button is on the listing page to keep consistency with existing
UI flows. That is, to put the actions on the relevant listing p
On 3/13/13 9:40 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote:
>I am trying to understand the deployment model with Asa1000v for the VPC
>use case mentioned in FS
>- Cloud operator creates VPC network offering with source nat using
>ASA1000v as the service provider for firewall, source nat, port
>forwarding, ACL and
Thanks Kelven for the input but I had resolved the issue . I had already copied
the vhd-util file since I had set up a brand new xenserver 6.1 host but that
wasn't the issue.
The issue was that the systemvm.iso wasn't found in the host and CS tried to
use some old template in my primary storage
Try to copy vhd-util to your XS host at /opt/xensource/bin if your XS host
is a brand new setup
Kelven
On 3/13/13 4:15 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
>$/pranav/incubator-cloudstack# find . -name vhd-util
>
>./client/target/generated-webapp/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xen
>server/vhd-uti
Pretty short meeting this week, it looks like DST took its toll...
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, at 12:32 PM, ASF IRC Services wrote:
> Members present: Animesh, kdamage, topcloud, jzb
>
>
> Meeting summary:
>
>
> 1. Preface
>
> 2. Active Feature Release: Overall Stat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9905/
---
(Updated March 13, 2013, 5:37 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9905/
---
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley and Chip Childers.
Description
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9894/#review17809
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On March 13, 2013, 8:32 a.m., Jaya
PVLAN provides "subnet within subnet" L2 isolation, it operates very
differently with current L3/L4 capable SG implementation, would it be a
good idea to just separate it as L2 isolation feature on its own?
Kelven
On 3/13/13 6:10 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Mar 12, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Manan S
Members present: Animesh, kdamage, topcloud, jzb
Meeting summary:
1. Preface
2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status
3. Active Feature Release: Feature Status
4. Active Feature Release: QA status
5. Active Feature Release: Docs Status
6. Active Feature Rel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9890/#review17808
---
Commit 05f73d0950d3a12591facce03e43201e2fbbff17 in branch refs/heads/
It's a bug. Error message shouldn't show the internal db id. Instead it should
show the UUID and/or name.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:04 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Error Deploying VM in 4.0
>
> On Mar 12,
+1
On 3/11/13 9:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether
>Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The
>result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to
>govern itself (which is a r
+1
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 11 March 2013 16:42
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator
Hi,
I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether
Apache Clo
I am trying to understand the deployment model with Asa1000v for the VPC use
case mentioned in FS
- Cloud operator creates VPC network offering with source nat using ASA1000v as
the service provider for firewall, source nat, port forwarding, ACL and
routing. CloudStack system vm is used for DHCP
Does this need to come in to 4.1?
--David
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:31 PM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master bf15eb0c7 -> 630e75596
>
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1653: Redundant router: Fix check_heartbeat.sh malfunctional due
> to delayed cron job
>
> The interval between keepalived.ts and
Abhi: Bharat:
Does this need to come into 4.1 as well?
--David
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:40 AM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 27b753a43 -> 6715f9808
>
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1551: Failed to list clusters due to NPE at
> createClusterResponse(ApiResponseHelper.java:837) when cluster
Final adjustment of names:
Adding Brett Porter to the PMC list (for those that don't know, he's one of
our mentors).
Any other questions or concerns?
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
> OK, here's the latest draft. It includes names now,
> although we are waiting for a couple of
I just tryed to build the 4.1 RPM using the last commit, and I had bunch
of warnings when installing the awapi package on a fresh CentOS 6
system. Looks like the cloud user should be created earlier in the
install process. Kinda trivial tho.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-16
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> CLOUDSTACK-1427: Failed to delete Guestnetwork which has LB with
> Netscaler
>
> There is no need for getIpDeployer to depend on the fact a NetScaler
> device is allocated (network is implemented state) or not-allocated
> (network is in shutdo
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:51 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>>> No volunteers to do commits for 4.2 today?
>>
>> I'll take it
>>
>> --David
>>
>
> Thanks. There are a few on the list to b
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:51 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> No volunteers to do commits for 4.2 today?
>
> I'll take it
>
> --David
>
Thanks. There are a few on the list to be done from over night.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9902/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-1157: No API Docu
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> No volunteers to do commits for 4.2 today?
>
I'll take it
--David
Just a note that I'm wrapping this discussion up and taking "DRAFT" off
the page as it's received no edits.
I suppose the next step will be to limit access to PPMC/committers and
coming up with a "rotation" to ensure that we keep the relevant accounts
active. I can continue to do Twitter and Face
Comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 13 March 2013 1:01 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RESTful agent for Hyper-V plugin
>
> On 13/03/13 3:14 PM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
>
On Mar 13, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, at 08:04 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012, at 02:13 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
Did we ever get this setup?
>>>
>>> Sorry - no, I dropped this. P
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013, at 08:04 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012, at 02:13 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> >> Did we ever get this setup?
> >
> > Sorry - no, I dropped this. Picking back up now. I'm going to send a
> > firm proposa
No volunteers to do commits for 4.2 today?
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
> As the subject said, I'll be sporadically online / offline tomorrow
> (March 13).
>
> Can I get a volunteer to help with patch reviews for 4.1 please? You
> may have to watch for review requests that do
On Mar 12, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
> Yes, Chiradeep, you are correct. The PVLAN would only be able to provide
> isolation at L2. The primary use case from the providers perspective is to
> run multiple shared networks (services network for monitoring, patching,
> etc). And on each of
On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012, at 02:13 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>> Did we ever get this setup?
>
> Sorry - no, I dropped this. Picking back up now. I'm going to send a
> firm proposal to the list and if we can get consensus I'll start getting
> it done
On 13/03/13 3:14 PM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
>
>WRT #2: C# code on a .NET framework classes is a well-supported
>implementation option. The code's copyright would be held by Apache
>CloudStack. The libraries on which it depended would be proprietary to
>Microsoft (.NET Runtime, and ASP.NET Web
On Mar 13, 2013, at 4:32 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> OK, here's the latest draft. It includes names now,
>> although we are waiting for a couple of mentors to respond to a
>> question around their interest in staying with the project
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012, at 02:13 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> Did we ever get this setup?
Sorry - no, I dropped this. Picking back up now. I'm going to send a
firm proposal to the list and if we can get consensus I'll start getting
it done. If at all humanly possible, I'd like to have analytics in pla
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9900/
---
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, Hugo Trippaers,
Alex
CLOUDSTACK-1427: Failed to delete Guestnetwork which has LB with
Netscaler
There is no need for getIpDeployer to depend on the fact a NetScaler
device is allocated (network is implemented state) or not-allocated
(network is in shutdown state)
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 2feda05ecd15d7fe63b
For me its little different. I am getting BOOTLOADER_FAILED error. I
have vhd-util on my host. Systemvm.iso is also getting downloaded but
its not starting.
Thanks,
Anshul
Ok , my issue is resolved now . So the first time when the systemvm.iso wasn't
found and CS tried to use some old template in my primary storage as a
reference to create systemVm's. After manually copying the systemvm.iso file
to the host and also deleting those stale images on my primary stor
$/pranav/incubator-cloudstack# find . -name vhd-util
./client/target/generated-webapp/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util
./client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util
./scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util
-Or
On the building wiki; see the building section:
Download this on your host:
http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util
And try again if that fails, we've a serious blocker on master that
needs verification and fix.
Regards.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Pranav Saxena wrote:
>
Will be offline to take care of some personal stuff.
--
Prasanna.,
On 13 March 2013 16:26, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
> I am also getting the same error
>
> Thanks,
> Anshul
> On 13/03/13 16:25, Pranav Saxena wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I tried to deploy latest master code to set up a developer's environment
>> (Ubuntu 12.10 , Xenserver 6.1 ) -
>>
>>
>> 1) mvn -P syst
I am also getting the same error
Thanks,
Anshul
On 13/03/13 16:25, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I tried to deploy latest master code to set up a developer's environment
> (Ubuntu 12.10 , Xenserver 6.1 ) -
>
>
> 1) mvn -P systemvm clean install (systemvm.iso got created)
>
> 2) Dep
This mail is regarding "support for storage motion on VMware". It was
mentioned before that the same FS as
xenmotion-https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Enabling+Storage+XenMotion+for+XenServer
- would be used for VMware storage motion too. I feel there is a need to
crea
Hi ,
I tried to deploy latest master code to set up a developer's environment
(Ubuntu 12.10 , Xenserver 6.1 ) -
1) mvn -P systemvm clean install (systemvm.iso got created)
2) Deployed the db
3) Started the jetty server
The systemvm.iso wasn't found on my host so I tried to
+1, quite liked the presentations from the last meeting
From: Giles Sirett [mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 12 March 2013 5:52 PM
To: cloudstack-market...@incubator.apache.org;
cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Beer, pizza & Cloudstack
[
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
